it all depends on what the pinch point in your system is. cpu, memory, harddrive. there is a decent argument that for most media applications, quadcore is overkill for even a very nice RAID system. there’s also a good argument that the memory subsystem, even at ddr3, doesn’t have enough throughput for a quad.

anyway, just sayin.

A prime example is 3D rendering software. If companies like PIXAR used single threaded renderers to create their movies, each film would take about 10 years just to render. Instead they use hundreds of CPUs, processing tons and tons of frames at the same time.

A more real world example: You need to dig a well. One person can move a shovel-full of dirt only so fast (like the GHz limit we have reached). With this limit, you have two ways to dig the well faster: use a bigger shovel (like 64 bit vs 32 bit) or use more people with more shovels digging at the same time (like mutli-core systems).

Since there are far more multi-threaded progams out there than 64-bit programs, Intel and AMD are going the multi-core route.

If you think a single core CPU will beat out a dual or quad core CPU in something like video encoding, try running two encoding sessions at once on each PC and see which one will win. The Dual and Quad core CPUs may have slightly slower clock speed, however they can complete multiple comands for every one of the single core’s. If the encoding sofware is written multi-threaded, a single session will use all cores at the same time and finish a hell of a lot faster. Period.

Buy zyban Buy cheap zyban online. Buy cheap zyban online. Generic zyban…

When You gaming FSB and Ghz is the most important. 2 cores are fine and a game can run nice, but when going overboard with it, its just stupid. Instead of moving forward with speed, we stand on the same spot and do nothing.

Compare 2 PCs one with dual core and other with single that are having same parameters. And do a Video encoding. And Tell me witch one is faster.

In the matter of fact I have compared my old CPU to a new Pentium D cpu. both of us have exactly same speed and L1 cash. But mine is older Pentium 4 cpu. Guess what, I won on encoding video and benchmarking on Prime95.

Both Intel and AMD is stuck on speed. They dont know What to do.

I believe AMD will move a lot into personal computers, While Intel will Move more into Servers.

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=103982&highlight=kentsfield

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=105352&highlight=kentsfield

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=109054&highlight=kentsfield

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=108745&highlight=kentsfield

If you think that a 4 core system is better than a 1 core system that is 4x faster then you are brain-dead wrong. Multi-core systems are much worse. Read up on it here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amdahl%27s_law

You obviously don’t understand it well enough to have a guided opinion.