<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stick 1-Line Phone Router</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/08/17/stick-1-line-phone-router/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/08/17/stick-1-line-phone-router/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 05:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: fishwreck</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/08/17/stick-1-line-phone-router/#comment-575</link>
		<dc:creator>fishwreck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2006 04:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/08/17/stick-1-line-phone-router/#comment-575</guid>
		<description>Are you kidding me? This thing has been around for at least a decade -- apparently unchanged. How can this possibly be considered newsworthy? 

Besides, who's still using phone lines, let alone dial-up modems and fax machines? ;-)

BTW, it's called "The Stick", not the "Phone Router" and my experience with several of these over several years indicates that they work reliably and are reasonably durable. At least, they were back in the 90's when we used them at the office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you kidding me? This thing has been around for at least a decade &#8212; apparently unchanged. How can this possibly be considered newsworthy? </p>
<p>Besides, who&#8217;s still using phone lines, let alone dial-up modems and fax machines? ;-)</p>
<p>BTW, it&#8217;s called &#8220;The Stick&#8221;, not the &#8220;Phone Router&#8221; and my experience with several of these over several years indicates that they work reliably and are reasonably durable. At least, they were back in the 90&#8217;s when we used them at the office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.070 seconds -->
