<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sprint to Offer Full-Length Movies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/09/06/sprint-to-offer-full-length-movies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/09/06/sprint-to-offer-full-length-movies/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 21:00:05 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/09/06/sprint-to-offer-full-length-movies/comment-page-1/#comment-2136</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 03:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/09/06/sprint-to-offer-full-length-movies/#comment-2136</guid>
		<description>I just love how these services pick brilliantly bad movies, then wonder why the service doesn&#039;t interest users. Look at the selection of UMD selections for PSP. They took a year before decent movies started to appear with regularity. I can&#039;t imagine why no one wanted them (besides the insane pricing, of course).

It&#039;s almost like the service providers are asking for failure to prove to the supporters it wouldn&#039;t work after all!

Fortunately this selection is about half decent. Dante&#039;s Peak and First Knight are balanced by Spiderman 2 and Animal House. But why have balance? Why not launch your first selection with a jaw droppingly interesting batch? Why crud it up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just love how these services pick brilliantly bad movies, then wonder why the service doesn&#8217;t interest users. Look at the selection of UMD selections for PSP. They took a year before decent movies started to appear with regularity. I can&#8217;t imagine why no one wanted them (besides the insane pricing, of course).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s almost like the service providers are asking for failure to prove to the supporters it wouldn&#8217;t work after all!</p>
<p>Fortunately this selection is about half decent. Dante&#8217;s Peak and First Knight are balanced by Spiderman 2 and Animal House. But why have balance? Why not launch your first selection with a jaw droppingly interesting batch? Why crud it up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/09/06/sprint-to-offer-full-length-movies/comment-page-1/#comment-2087</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 17:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/09/06/sprint-to-offer-full-length-movies/#comment-2087</guid>
		<description>A phone&#039;s screen is perfect for watching feature length films.  This is ok from a technical point of view, but completely unrealistic from the consumers.  

Message to Sprint: offer this as a free service to revive your dying brand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A phone&#8217;s screen is perfect for watching feature length films.  This is ok from a technical point of view, but completely unrealistic from the consumers.  </p>
<p>Message to Sprint: offer this as a free service to revive your dying brand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webonics</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/09/06/sprint-to-offer-full-length-movies/comment-page-1/#comment-2069</link>
		<dc:creator>webonics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 15:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/09/06/sprint-to-offer-full-length-movies/#comment-2069</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t imagine watching a film on anything but a smartphone or laptop with the Sprint service.

One thing that bothers me is that you can now rent a film for $4/$6, but a ringtone costs $2.50-$4.  And you can buy the whole song off of iTunes for $1.  Sprint needs to review and/or renegotiate their pricing on some of their offerings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t imagine watching a film on anything but a smartphone or laptop with the Sprint service.</p>
<p>One thing that bothers me is that you can now rent a film for $4/$6, but a ringtone costs $2.50-$4.  And you can buy the whole song off of iTunes for $1.  Sprint needs to review and/or renegotiate their pricing on some of their offerings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
