<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: T-Mo Drops Two New Sexy, Sexy Samsungs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/09/20/t-mo-drops-two-new-sexy-sexy-samsungs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/09/20/t-mo-drops-two-new-sexy-sexy-samsungs/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 17:14:26 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: T-Mobile, Samsung Win Most Boring New Phone Contest</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/09/20/t-mo-drops-two-new-sexy-sexy-samsungs/comment-page-1/#comment-102746</link>
		<dc:creator>T-Mobile, Samsung Win Most Boring New Phone Contest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 19:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/09/20/t-mo-drops-two-new-sexy-sexy-samsungs/#comment-102746</guid>
		<description>[...] cameraphone, which sells for $50 with a two-year plan, can&#8217;t compare to the Samsung t619, with its slimmer form factor, 1.3-megapixel picture taker, and the fact that it&#8217;s free with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] cameraphone, which sells for $50 with a two-year plan, can&#8217;t compare to the Samsung t619, with its slimmer form factor, 1.3-megapixel picture taker, and the fact that it&#8217;s free with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
