<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cingular and Double Standards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/09/21/cingular-and-double-standards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/09/21/cingular-and-double-standards/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 06:30:45 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rcadden</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/09/21/cingular-and-double-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-4502</link>
		<dc:creator>rcadden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/09/21/cingular-and-double-standards/#comment-4502</guid>
		<description>*sigh* As a new site, I was really hoping you&#039;d run better stories than this. This clause has been in Cingular (and Sprint, ftr) contracts for YEARS, they just haven&#039;t really enforced it until recently. 

Also, if anyone would actually read their cellphone contract, it&#039;s not a 2-sided agreement. It&#039;s a contract that says they don&#039;t guarantee service everywhere, that they will not reimburse you if the network is down and you lose business, etc. etc. ad nauseum. Basically, use at your own risk, but you&#039;re required to keep paying us anyways. 

This is cause (at least in the US) the contract is required in order to get roughly $100-150 off the retail price of the handset that you pick. It has nothing to do with service in the least bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*sigh* As a new site, I was really hoping you&#8217;d run better stories than this. This clause has been in Cingular (and Sprint, ftr) contracts for YEARS, they just haven&#8217;t really enforced it until recently. </p>
<p>Also, if anyone would actually read their cellphone contract, it&#8217;s not a 2-sided agreement. It&#8217;s a contract that says they don&#8217;t guarantee service everywhere, that they will not reimburse you if the network is down and you lose business, etc. etc. ad nauseum. Basically, use at your own risk, but you&#8217;re required to keep paying us anyways. </p>
<p>This is cause (at least in the US) the contract is required in order to get roughly $100-150 off the retail price of the handset that you pick. It has nothing to do with service in the least bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/09/21/cingular-and-double-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-4491</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 14:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/09/21/cingular-and-double-standards/#comment-4491</guid>
		<description>I always hated cingular and their outrageous charges and nitpicking even though I had been with at&amp;t before that and before at&amp;t it was cellular one...15+ years and you&#039;d think they&#039;d do anything to keep me...NO. But I must admit the UMTS phone they have coming out made me think twice about leaving but only for a second.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always hated cingular and their outrageous charges and nitpicking even though I had been with at&amp;t before that and before at&amp;t it was cellular one&#8230;15+ years and you&#8217;d think they&#8217;d do anything to keep me&#8230;NO. But I must admit the UMTS phone they have coming out made me think twice about leaving but only for a second.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
