<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WinXP As House: Discuss</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/09/25/winxp-as-house-discuss/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/09/25/winxp-as-house-discuss/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:21:55 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lee451</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/09/25/winxp-as-house-discuss/comment-page-1/#comment-5097</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee451</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 01:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/09/25/winxp-as-house-discuss/#comment-5097</guid>
		<description>I am sure Mr. Bunting probably was too busy writing the code for his own O/S to actually research and write an article of substance. Windows XP is not perfect but it is much better than the 95, 98, ME, etc. versions of the operating system. And as it is used by a large majority of the computer users on this planet, faults are bound to be found. I have never used a Mac or any open sourse O/Ses but if they are so superior, why did MS end up being on 95% of personal computers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sure Mr. Bunting probably was too busy writing the code for his own O/S to actually research and write an article of substance. Windows XP is not perfect but it is much better than the 95, 98, ME, etc. versions of the operating system. And as it is used by a large majority of the computer users on this planet, faults are bound to be found. I have never used a Mac or any open sourse O/Ses but if they are so superior, why did MS end up being on 95% of personal computers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webonics</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/09/25/winxp-as-house-discuss/comment-page-1/#comment-5056</link>
		<dc:creator>webonics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/09/25/winxp-as-house-discuss/#comment-5056</guid>
		<description>It seems a little redundant and well overdue to make a critique of an O/S that has been out on the market for over 5 years and the newest version is on the verge of release.  The article also really lacked much substance.  

I&#039;d give more weight to this article if it was stating that Vista, Ubuntu, or Leopard were crap only because they are forthcoming.  I don&#039;t like to review products in hindsight, just IMHO yo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems a little redundant and well overdue to make a critique of an O/S that has been out on the market for over 5 years and the newest version is on the verge of release.  The article also really lacked much substance.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;d give more weight to this article if it was stating that Vista, Ubuntu, or Leopard were crap only because they are forthcoming.  I don&#8217;t like to review products in hindsight, just IMHO yo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
