<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RIYL: Hatin&#8217; On Sony&#8217;s Reader</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/09/27/riyl-hatin-on-sonys-reader/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/09/27/riyl-hatin-on-sonys-reader/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:24:19 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Josh Goldman</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/09/27/riyl-hatin-on-sonys-reader/comment-page-1/#comment-5415</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Goldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 20:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/09/27/riyl-hatin-on-sonys-reader/#comment-5415</guid>
		<description>The room was basically lit by candles and I didn&#039;t have any trouble reading the print with the display at a general reading distance from my eyes, say about a foot. Probably about as much light as you&#039;d get from a street light coming through a window. Enlarging the print a notch up from the default helped too. Plus, it didn&#039;t make my eyes tired like looking at a backlit display tends to. And to clarify, I only read about three pages of text, so I don&#039;t know for sure that after a half hour of reading I won&#039;t want to throw the thing across the room. ;) 
My only real complaint was the flickering that occured on screen when you &quot;turned&quot; pages. I hope that the sales are good enough to encourage them to develop and release the next generation Reader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The room was basically lit by candles and I didn&#8217;t have any trouble reading the print with the display at a general reading distance from my eyes, say about a foot. Probably about as much light as you&#8217;d get from a street light coming through a window. Enlarging the print a notch up from the default helped too. Plus, it didn&#8217;t make my eyes tired like looking at a backlit display tends to. And to clarify, I only read about three pages of text, so I don&#8217;t know for sure that after a half hour of reading I won&#8217;t want to throw the thing across the room. ;)<br />
My only real complaint was the flickering that occured on screen when you &#8220;turned&#8221; pages. I hope that the sales are good enough to encourage them to develop and release the next generation Reader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David H. Rothman</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/09/27/riyl-hatin-on-sonys-reader/comment-page-1/#comment-5389</link>
		<dc:creator>David H. Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/09/27/riyl-hatin-on-sonys-reader/#comment-5389</guid>
		<description>Appreciated your info, Josh. Can you tell us more about your Sony encounter in that very dark room? 

I owned a Librie and found it a real hassle to read in dim light. I understand that Sony improved the screen a bit, but can you really read it &quot;easily and without strain&quot;? 

Under those circumstances, how close was the Sony to paper? 

As for the Edsel metaphor, I presented it as a question. My current belief is that the Sony will do okay as a niche product. 

Regardless of my dislike of proprietary formats and DRM, let&#039;s hope that the Sony succeeds---for the general benefit of e-bookdom!

Thanks, 
 David Rothman

P.S. Nice site!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Appreciated your info, Josh. Can you tell us more about your Sony encounter in that very dark room? </p>
<p>I owned a Librie and found it a real hassle to read in dim light. I understand that Sony improved the screen a bit, but can you really read it &#8220;easily and without strain&#8221;? </p>
<p>Under those circumstances, how close was the Sony to paper? </p>
<p>As for the Edsel metaphor, I presented it as a question. My current belief is that the Sony will do okay as a niche product. </p>
<p>Regardless of my dislike of proprietary formats and DRM, let&#8217;s hope that the Sony succeeds&#8212;for the general benefit of e-bookdom!</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
 David Rothman</p>
<p>P.S. Nice site!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
