<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ageia Announces Development Of PCI Express PhysX Card</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/10/02/ageia-announces-development-of-pci-express-physx-card/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/10/02/ageia-announces-development-of-pci-express-physx-card/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:13:02 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: fumar</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/10/02/ageia-announces-development-of-pci-express-physx-card/comment-page-1/#comment-6680</link>
		<dc:creator>fumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 19:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/10/02/ageia-announces-development-of-pci-express-physx-card/#comment-6680</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s still too expensive a card for me to want one. Maybe when it gets below $200 I&#039;ll grab one, thats also if UT2007  and future BF games make use of it (UT2007 already does).  

I agree with Deus Mortus, Microsoft needs to create something like DX for physics or integrate it into DX11. I don&#039;t want to have to use a GPU just for physics, esp if its an ultra high end GPU that isnt being fully used. 

I really like the ATI way with physics, just slap an old GPU into the motherboard and it will just do physics. 

Ageia isn&#039;t screwed as long as Unreal Engine 3.0 supports Physx.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s still too expensive a card for me to want one. Maybe when it gets below $200 I&#8217;ll grab one, thats also if UT2007  and future BF games make use of it (UT2007 already does).  </p>
<p>I agree with Deus Mortus, Microsoft needs to create something like DX for physics or integrate it into DX11. I don&#8217;t want to have to use a GPU just for physics, esp if its an ultra high end GPU that isnt being fully used. </p>
<p>I really like the ATI way with physics, just slap an old GPU into the motherboard and it will just do physics. </p>
<p>Ageia isn&#8217;t screwed as long as Unreal Engine 3.0 supports Physx.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Loeki</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/10/02/ageia-announces-development-of-pci-express-physx-card/comment-page-1/#comment-6183</link>
		<dc:creator>The Loeki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 08:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/10/02/ageia-announces-development-of-pci-express-physx-card/#comment-6183</guid>
		<description>Me too.

Besides, they&#039;ve got more supported games in the pipeline.
In the areas where physics become an issue we&#039;ve seen impressive results with this card.

It&#039;s way too premature to hack down this new technology as obsolete (and a bit fatalistic too).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me too.</p>
<p>Besides, they&#8217;ve got more supported games in the pipeline.<br />
In the areas where physics become an issue we&#8217;ve seen impressive results with this card.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s way too premature to hack down this new technology as obsolete (and a bit fatalistic too).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deus Mortus</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/10/02/ageia-announces-development-of-pci-express-physx-card/comment-page-1/#comment-6172</link>
		<dc:creator>Deus Mortus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 03:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/10/02/ageia-announces-development-of-pci-express-physx-card/#comment-6172</guid>
		<description>You can&#039;t blame them for not being compatible with games, the game developers need to make that decision, or perhaps microsoft with support with their directx.

I really beleive that this is a good concept and that it just needs time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t blame them for not being compatible with games, the game developers need to make that decision, or perhaps microsoft with support with their directx.</p>
<p>I really beleive that this is a good concept and that it just needs time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
