<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Death of a Dongle: ATI&#8217;s Radeon X1950 Pro</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/10/17/death-of-a-dongle-atis-radeon-x1950-pro/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/10/17/death-of-a-dongle-atis-radeon-x1950-pro/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:12:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CrunchGear &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ATI Launches Midrange Radeon X1650 XT</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/10/17/death-of-a-dongle-atis-radeon-x1950-pro/comment-page-1/#comment-11757</link>
		<dc:creator>CrunchGear &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ATI Launches Midrange Radeon X1650 XT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 13:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/10/17/death-of-a-dongle-atis-radeon-x1950-pro/#comment-11757</guid>
		<description>[...] It&#8217;s always fun to look at, dream about, lust after the high-end stuff, but when it comes down to it, most of us go right for the midrange option on whatever we&#8217;re buying. That&#8217;s what makes the new CrossFire-ready 256MB X1650 XT so appealing. It&#8217;s reasonably priced at $149 and has a good helping of the features you&#8217;ll find on the more expensive cards from the company. And it uses the improved version of the ATI&#8217;s CrossFire multi-GPU technology. However, the X1650 XT uses GDDR3 instead of the newer GDDR4 memory and has half the pixel shader processors of the X1950 PRO. There&#8217;s also no support for DirectX 10 yet, though at this price point, I&#8217;m not really sure it would make or break my decision to pick one up. Plus, if you haven&#8217;t updated your desktop to PCI Express yet, there&#8217;s an AGP version. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It&#8217;s always fun to look at, dream about, lust after the high-end stuff, but when it comes down to it, most of us go right for the midrange option on whatever we&#8217;re buying. That&#8217;s what makes the new CrossFire-ready 256MB X1650 XT so appealing. It&#8217;s reasonably priced at $149 and has a good helping of the features you&#8217;ll find on the more expensive cards from the company. And it uses the improved version of the ATI&#8217;s CrossFire multi-GPU technology. However, the X1650 XT uses GDDR3 instead of the newer GDDR4 memory and has half the pixel shader processors of the X1950 PRO. There&#8217;s also no support for DirectX 10 yet, though at this price point, I&#8217;m not really sure it would make or break my decision to pick one up. Plus, if you haven&#8217;t updated your desktop to PCI Express yet, there&#8217;s an AGP version. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CrunchGear &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Folding@Home Works 20x Faster On a GPU Than CPU?</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/10/17/death-of-a-dongle-atis-radeon-x1950-pro/comment-page-1/#comment-7941</link>
		<dc:creator>CrunchGear &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Folding@Home Works 20x Faster On a GPU Than CPU?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/10/17/death-of-a-dongle-atis-radeon-x1950-pro/#comment-7941</guid>
		<description>[...] There&#8217;s been rumors on the internets that if you use a GPU (graphics card) like the ATI Radeon X1950 Pro we looked at earlier to run the Folding@Home software, you&#8217;ll get 20 to 40 times the output compared to a CPU. That&#8217;s a mighty bold claim, one that Techreport discovered wasn&#8217;t quite as it seemed. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There&#8217;s been rumors on the internets that if you use a GPU (graphics card) like the ATI Radeon X1950 Pro we looked at earlier to run the Folding@Home software, you&#8217;ll get 20 to 40 times the output compared to a CPU. That&#8217;s a mighty bold claim, one that Techreport discovered wasn&#8217;t quite as it seemed. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
