<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Leica M8 Goes Digital, Expensive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/10/19/leica-m8-goes-digital-expensive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/10/19/leica-m8-goes-digital-expensive/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 10:35:16 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CrunchGear &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Kodak EasyShare C875 Review</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/10/19/leica-m8-goes-digital-expensive/comment-page-1/#comment-10052</link>
		<dc:creator>CrunchGear &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Kodak EasyShare C875 Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 12:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/10/19/leica-m8-goes-digital-expensive/#comment-10052</guid>
		<description>[...] In the annals of photography, a few brands stand out as film juggernauts that barely made the jump to digital and, in some cases, died in the process. Leica. Polaroid. Eastman Kodak. How far the mighty have fallen, friends. Leica is aiming for the stars, Polaroid is almost gone, and Kodak, bless its heart, is hanging on by a thread. Has old Kodachrome fallen yet? No, it hasn&#8217;t, thanks to easy to use entry-level cameras like the C875. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In the annals of photography, a few brands stand out as film juggernauts that barely made the jump to digital and, in some cases, died in the process. Leica. Polaroid. Eastman Kodak. How far the mighty have fallen, friends. Leica is aiming for the stars, Polaroid is almost gone, and Kodak, bless its heart, is hanging on by a thread. Has old Kodachrome fallen yet? No, it hasn&#8217;t, thanks to easy to use entry-level cameras like the C875. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spawnofbill</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/10/19/leica-m8-goes-digital-expensive/comment-page-1/#comment-8583</link>
		<dc:creator>spawnofbill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 06:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/10/19/leica-m8-goes-digital-expensive/#comment-8583</guid>
		<description>Um.  The camera does not come with 4GB of storage.  It takes an SD card, and the camera supports cards up to 4GB.  The reason why this camera is so expensive is 1)it uses a larger than usual sensor. 2)it&#039;s a rangefinder, which means it has to be ALOT smaller than DSLR&#039;s (sure, you could make it big, but what would be the point). 3)it&#039;s a friggin Leica, their film M series camera&#039;s cost 3k!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um.  The camera does not come with 4GB of storage.  It takes an SD card, and the camera supports cards up to 4GB.  The reason why this camera is so expensive is 1)it uses a larger than usual sensor. 2)it&#8217;s a rangefinder, which means it has to be ALOT smaller than DSLR&#8217;s (sure, you could make it big, but what would be the point). 3)it&#8217;s a friggin Leica, their film M series camera&#8217;s cost 3k!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Flores</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/10/19/leica-m8-goes-digital-expensive/comment-page-1/#comment-8356</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Flores</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 20:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/10/19/leica-m8-goes-digital-expensive/#comment-8356</guid>
		<description>How much did you say it costs?  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much did you say it costs?  :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David P</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/10/19/leica-m8-goes-digital-expensive/comment-page-1/#comment-8338</link>
		<dc:creator>David P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 18:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/10/19/leica-m8-goes-digital-expensive/#comment-8338</guid>
		<description>LOL.  The hour glass on the upper left corner of the pic made me shake my mouse thinking my computer was acting funny.  Well played CrunchGear.  Well played.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL.  The hour glass on the upper left corner of the pic made me shake my mouse thinking my computer was acting funny.  Well played CrunchGear.  Well played.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
