<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Battle Test: Nokia E62 and BH-800</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/10/25/battle-test-nokia-e62-and-bh-800/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/10/25/battle-test-nokia-e62-and-bh-800/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/10/25/battle-test-nokia-e62-and-bh-800/#comment-354922</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 00:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/10/25/battle-test-nokia-e62-and-bh-800/#comment-354922</guid>
		<description>I mean back cover and battery off the Sp3i...oops !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mean back cover and battery off the Sp3i&#8230;oops !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/10/25/battle-test-nokia-e62-and-bh-800/#comment-354919</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 00:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/10/25/battle-test-nokia-e62-and-bh-800/#comment-354919</guid>
		<description>I do want to make a note that the mini-sd card can be taken out without taken out the battery. You just first "eject" the card from the menu, open the back cover and take out the card. Much better than the Sp3i which did involved me taking out the back covers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do want to make a note that the mini-sd card can be taken out without taken out the battery. You just first &#8220;eject&#8221; the card from the menu, open the back cover and take out the card. Much better than the Sp3i which did involved me taking out the back covers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/10/25/battle-test-nokia-e62-and-bh-800/#comment-226267</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 15:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/10/25/battle-test-nokia-e62-and-bh-800/#comment-226267</guid>
		<description>I think it's interesting you like the E62 better than the 8125. My 8125 got left in the rental car a week ago and I just got the E62 as a replacement. While I grumbled about the 8125, I now miss it.
E62 pros:
* Beautiful screen
* Perfect Bluetooth
* Better address book

E62 cons:
* Horrible signal problems. I'm right by a tower at work and the signal keeps dropping to 1-2 bars. At home, I can barely talk on the phone the signal constantly moves between 5 and 0 and drops me constantly. This is a critical problem for me and may necessitate a new phone soon.
* Slow (the 8125 wasn't exactly a speed demon though)
* Not very customizable
* Too many key presses to get where you want. It should be smarter.
* And others (like not autofilling a contact's name when making a txt msg).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s interesting you like the E62 better than the 8125. My 8125 got left in the rental car a week ago and I just got the E62 as a replacement. While I grumbled about the 8125, I now miss it.<br />
E62 pros:<br />
* Beautiful screen<br />
* Perfect Bluetooth<br />
* Better address book</p>
<p>E62 cons:<br />
* Horrible signal problems. I&#8217;m right by a tower at work and the signal keeps dropping to 1-2 bars. At home, I can barely talk on the phone the signal constantly moves between 5 and 0 and drops me constantly. This is a critical problem for me and may necessitate a new phone soon.<br />
* Slow (the 8125 wasn&#8217;t exactly a speed demon though)<br />
* Not very customizable<br />
* Too many key presses to get where you want. It should be smarter.<br />
* And others (like not autofilling a contact&#8217;s name when making a txt msg).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/10/25/battle-test-nokia-e62-and-bh-800/#comment-23711</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 19:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/10/25/battle-test-nokia-e62-and-bh-800/#comment-23711</guid>
		<description>Everytime I synchronize, I have duplicate entries on my calendar. I have looked, and I see no way to set it properly. Am I missing something?
THx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everytime I synchronize, I have duplicate entries on my calendar. I have looked, and I see no way to set it properly. Am I missing something?<br />
THx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Battle Test: Nokia E62 and BH-800 - CrunchGear &#187; morecellphone.com</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/10/25/battle-test-nokia-e62-and-bh-800/#comment-20124</link>
		<dc:creator>Battle Test: Nokia E62 and BH-800 - CrunchGear &#187; morecellphone.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 08:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/10/25/battle-test-nokia-e62-and-bh-800/#comment-20124</guid>
		<description>[...] Battle Test: Nokia E62 and BH-800 - CrunchGear  Battle Test: Nokia E62 and BH-800CrunchGear,&#160;NY&#160;- 19 hours agoThe Nokia E62 is an interesting little beast. ... I’ve been using the Cingular 8125 (HTC Wizard) and I find the Nokia E62 to be far more useable. ... Battle Test: Nokia E62 and BH-800 mobile9all 3 news articles [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Battle Test: Nokia E62 and BH-800 - CrunchGear  Battle Test: Nokia E62 and BH-800CrunchGear,&nbsp;NY&nbsp;- 19 hours agoThe Nokia E62 is an interesting little beast. &#8230; I’ve been using the Cingular 8125 (HTC Wizard) and I find the Nokia E62 to be far more useable. &#8230; Battle Test: Nokia E62 and BH-800 mobile9all 3 news articles [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nokia E62 Reviews &#187; My Digital Life</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/10/25/battle-test-nokia-e62-and-bh-800/#comment-12923</link>
		<dc:creator>Nokia E62 Reviews &#187; My Digital Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 23:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/10/25/battle-test-nokia-e62-and-bh-800/#comment-12923</guid>
		<description>[...] CrunchGear meanwhile concludes that if you’re on Cingular and you need a touchscreen with true mobile broadband then you might want to wait until the 8525 (HTC Hermes) goes retail (soon). If can’t wait for the 8525 with its HSDPA enlightenment, then the Nokia E62 is undoubtedly the way to go. The E62 is available now for $149.99 with a two year contract and the BH-800 Bluetooth headset can be had for about $120. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CrunchGear meanwhile concludes that if you’re on Cingular and you need a touchscreen with true mobile broadband then you might want to wait until the 8525 (HTC Hermes) goes retail (soon). If can’t wait for the 8525 with its HSDPA enlightenment, then the Nokia E62 is undoubtedly the way to go. The E62 is available now for $149.99 with a two year contract and the BH-800 Bluetooth headset can be had for about $120. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judi Sohn</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/10/25/battle-test-nokia-e62-and-bh-800/#comment-9770</link>
		<dc:creator>Judi Sohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 21:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/10/25/battle-test-nokia-e62-and-bh-800/#comment-9770</guid>
		<description>EDGE speeds and reliability vary wildly. I live outside of Princeton, NJ and I have a Cingular 8125. Over the past few weeks I have been thisclose to going to a Cingular store to trade in the SIM, thinking there had to be something wrong. It has been terribly slow, often going completely offline (icon is two arrows with an 'x' meaning there is no GPRS or EDGE at all). I spent the last two days in Columbia, SC and it was so much better. I could have sworn I was connected to a hotspot. Smooth, fast, continuous connections that I never see here. 

And New York city is the worst for EDGE, in my experience. When it works, which isn't every time, it's passable but nothing outstanding. My connections in South Carolina were outstanding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EDGE speeds and reliability vary wildly. I live outside of Princeton, NJ and I have a Cingular 8125. Over the past few weeks I have been thisclose to going to a Cingular store to trade in the SIM, thinking there had to be something wrong. It has been terribly slow, often going completely offline (icon is two arrows with an &#8216;x&#8217; meaning there is no GPRS or EDGE at all). I spent the last two days in Columbia, SC and it was so much better. I could have sworn I was connected to a hotspot. Smooth, fast, continuous connections that I never see here. </p>
<p>And New York city is the worst for EDGE, in my experience. When it works, which isn&#8217;t every time, it&#8217;s passable but nothing outstanding. My connections in South Carolina were outstanding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/10/25/battle-test-nokia-e62-and-bh-800/#comment-9762</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 20:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/10/25/battle-test-nokia-e62-and-bh-800/#comment-9762</guid>
		<description>How slow is the EDGE connection you are getting? On my e61 I get about 500kbs... blazing compared to my Treo 650.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How slow is the EDGE connection you are getting? On my e61 I get about 500kbs&#8230; blazing compared to my Treo 650.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.369 seconds -->
