<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple&#8217;s New iPod: Touch Bezel, Not Touchscreen?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/10/26/apples-new-ipod-touch-bezel-not-touchscreen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/10/26/apples-new-ipod-touch-bezel-not-touchscreen/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 09:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: CrunchGear &#187; Blog Archive &#187; New Patent Shows iPhone iDeas</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/10/26/apples-new-ipod-touch-bezel-not-touchscreen/#comment-30204</link>
		<dc:creator>CrunchGear &#187; Blog Archive &#187; New Patent Shows iPhone iDeas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 20:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/10/26/apples-new-ipod-touch-bezel-not-touchscreen/#comment-30204</guid>
		<description>[...] In addition, Apple points out in the patent application that the control design isn&#8217;t locked down, giving them room to try less traditional (for Apple, anyway) input devices, like the new and sexy touch bezel (look for marketing to call this tech &#8220;Touchedge&#8221; or something) Apple filed in a different patent. Combine these two, and we&#8217;re getting a sense of exactly what the iPhone might be like, but we&#8217;ll have to wait until January the future to be sure. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In addition, Apple points out in the patent application that the control design isn&#8217;t locked down, giving them room to try less traditional (for Apple, anyway) input devices, like the new and sexy touch bezel (look for marketing to call this tech &#8220;Touchedge&#8221; or something) Apple filed in a different patent. Combine these two, and we&#8217;re getting a sense of exactly what the iPhone might be like, but we&#8217;ll have to wait until January the future to be sure. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CrunchGear &#187; Blog Archive &#187; No Touch-Screen For YOU: Relax, It Was Just A Typo</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/10/26/apples-new-ipod-touch-bezel-not-touchscreen/#comment-13323</link>
		<dc:creator>CrunchGear &#187; Blog Archive &#187; No Touch-Screen For YOU: Relax, It Was Just A Typo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 19:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/10/26/apples-new-ipod-touch-bezel-not-touchscreen/#comment-13323</guid>
		<description>[...] Jeez, I really can&#8217;t wait for Apple to release a touch-screen/touch-sensitive something, because I really can&#8217;t take this rumor crap much more. This time around it&#8217;s a supposed secret slip up someone discovered in an Apple Computer iPod developer document. The original document had a single note that stated &#8220;All other Notes feature capabilities described in this document are supported for iPod models with display screens, beginning with the touch-screen models.&#8221; But as you can see in the image above, Apple&#8217;s already stepped in and clarified the note, changing it to touch-wheel. Of course, you can feel free to continue speculation. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeez, I really can&#8217;t wait for Apple to release a touch-screen/touch-sensitive something, because I really can&#8217;t take this rumor crap much more. This time around it&#8217;s a supposed secret slip up someone discovered in an Apple Computer iPod developer document. The original document had a single note that stated &#8220;All other Notes feature capabilities described in this document are supported for iPod models with display screens, beginning with the touch-screen models.&#8221; But as you can see in the image above, Apple&#8217;s already stepped in and clarified the note, changing it to touch-wheel. Of course, you can feel free to continue speculation. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Rumor: Apple touch bezel, not touchscreen for video iPod &#124; Gadgetell</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/10/26/apples-new-ipod-touch-bezel-not-touchscreen/#comment-12550</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Rumor: Apple touch bezel, not touchscreen for video iPod &#124; Gadgetell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 03:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/10/26/apples-new-ipod-touch-bezel-not-touchscreen/#comment-12550</guid>
		<description>[...] [HRMPF] Via [CrunchGear]    Comment on this post &#124; Permalink &#124; Email thisarticle [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [HRMPF] Via [CrunchGear]    Comment on this post | Permalink | Email thisarticle [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech Puddle &#187; iPod 6G interface rumors</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/10/26/apples-new-ipod-touch-bezel-not-touchscreen/#comment-10307</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech Puddle &#187; iPod 6G interface rumors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 00:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/10/26/apples-new-ipod-touch-bezel-not-touchscreen/#comment-10307</guid>
		<description>[...] via [CrunchGear] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via [CrunchGear] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.221 seconds -->
