<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kodak EasyShare C875 Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/10/26/kodak-easyshare-c875-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/10/26/kodak-easyshare-c875-review/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 09:36:20 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Review: Kodak EasyShare C875 &#124; Adobe Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/10/26/kodak-easyshare-c875-review/comment-page-1/#comment-475380</link>
		<dc:creator>Review: Kodak EasyShare C875 &#124; Adobe Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 11:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/10/26/kodak-easyshare-c875-review/#comment-475380</guid>
		<description>[...] Read More&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read More&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Click Here</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/10/26/kodak-easyshare-c875-review/comment-page-1/#comment-471172</link>
		<dc:creator>Click Here</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 02:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/10/26/kodak-easyshare-c875-review/#comment-471172</guid>
		<description>It is accurate that tracking down truthful info on this topic can be troublesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is accurate that tracking down truthful info on this topic can be troublesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/10/26/kodak-easyshare-c875-review/comment-page-1/#comment-175828</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 18:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/10/26/kodak-easyshare-c875-review/#comment-175828</guid>
		<description>The canons image, the pumpkin is red? the Kodak recorded the color perfect and the light perfect. I never saw a red pumpkin before. LOL!!!!!!!!

In the kodak&#039;s image the chair is sharp where as the canon is blured. what your saying don&#039;t make sence about flat images. Flat images are images that have shallow BG&#039;s images that &quot;pop out&quot;, have sharp foregrounds and BG&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The canons image, the pumpkin is red? the Kodak recorded the color perfect and the light perfect. I never saw a red pumpkin before. LOL!!!!!!!!</p>
<p>In the kodak&#8217;s image the chair is sharp where as the canon is blured. what your saying don&#8217;t make sence about flat images. Flat images are images that have shallow BG&#8217;s images that &#8220;pop out&#8221;, have sharp foregrounds and BG&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/10/26/kodak-easyshare-c875-review/comment-page-1/#comment-175818</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/10/26/kodak-easyshare-c875-review/#comment-175818</guid>
		<description>John, are you kidding me? the Kodak c875 image is sharper then the rebel junk. The rebels image, the colors are smeared together do to the make up and firmware that the CMOS must have to work. Where as the C875&#039;s color is defined and crisp. 
the rebel might perform better as the higher iso and f numbers but in normal outside day light the C875 will produce a better image every time.
I own the Pentax ist DL (fake looking color and low MP) and Canon rebel &amp; A640 (Canon images are soft)and a Minolta D7 (great at handheld IR work). The Kodak out performs them all in normal shooting. The only advantage the DSLR&#039;s have is the night photo shots at football games and such on account of the higher ISO and stronger noise removal built into the camera&#039;s firmware.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, are you kidding me? the Kodak c875 image is sharper then the rebel junk. The rebels image, the colors are smeared together do to the make up and firmware that the CMOS must have to work. Where as the C875&#8217;s color is defined and crisp.<br />
the rebel might perform better as the higher iso and f numbers but in normal outside day light the C875 will produce a better image every time.<br />
I own the Pentax ist DL (fake looking color and low MP) and Canon rebel &amp; A640 (Canon images are soft)and a Minolta D7 (great at handheld IR work). The Kodak out performs them all in normal shooting. The only advantage the DSLR&#8217;s have is the night photo shots at football games and such on account of the higher ISO and stronger noise removal built into the camera&#8217;s firmware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davyo, Las Vegas, Nevada</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/10/26/kodak-easyshare-c875-review/comment-page-1/#comment-43598</link>
		<dc:creator>Davyo, Las Vegas, Nevada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 15:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/10/26/kodak-easyshare-c875-review/#comment-43598</guid>
		<description>Yea, what Paul (the other poster) said and more. 

The image from the Kodak looks better than the Canon image.

I also own many digital cameras, 2 of them are Kodaks, and I gota say the Kodaks take some pretty darn good pictures,, most of the time the Kodak pictures are better than my Panasonic and Sony cameras that I own. 
Also, a few of the Canons I have taken home and tried out got returned after I compared them to my Kodaks.

Kodaks I own &quot;Z612&quot; and a older &quot;V550&quot;,,, I think Im going to be picking up the C875 next.

Davyo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, what Paul (the other poster) said and more. </p>
<p>The image from the Kodak looks better than the Canon image.</p>
<p>I also own many digital cameras, 2 of them are Kodaks, and I gota say the Kodaks take some pretty darn good pictures,, most of the time the Kodak pictures are better than my Panasonic and Sony cameras that I own.<br />
Also, a few of the Canons I have taken home and tried out got returned after I compared them to my Kodaks.</p>
<p>Kodaks I own &#8220;Z612&#8243; and a older &#8220;V550&#8243;,,, I think Im going to be picking up the C875 next.</p>
<p>Davyo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Marshall</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/10/26/kodak-easyshare-c875-review/comment-page-1/#comment-37416</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Marshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 03:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/10/26/kodak-easyshare-c875-review/#comment-37416</guid>
		<description>Dear John;
That was kind of a shallow review on the Kodak C875. Comparing one of it&#039;s shots with a digital Rebel is okay, but that hardly constitutes a review. What about shots using the manual modes or aperture priority, say at f8 ? That should give you some depth. By the way the Rebel shot looks quite underexposed. The windmill is all but blacked out and the object in the foreground..what is it? In the Kodak shot I can read &quot;irardelli&quot; on the package in the forground and see detail in the windmill. Looks like the light meter was trying to read the shadows in low ambient light which it correctly did. What about the flash performance of the Kodak, and the characteristics of the LCD...does it gain up in low light, is it fairly easy to read in sunlight? Is there any purple fringing across the zoom range? Is distortion at wide and telephoto extremes very significant? Whats your background in photography? Are you really competant at helping the public to evaluate cameras? Don&#039;t answer that because I&#039;m sure that John is Bigg on himself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear John;<br />
That was kind of a shallow review on the Kodak C875. Comparing one of it&#8217;s shots with a digital Rebel is okay, but that hardly constitutes a review. What about shots using the manual modes or aperture priority, say at f8 ? That should give you some depth. By the way the Rebel shot looks quite underexposed. The windmill is all but blacked out and the object in the foreground..what is it? In the Kodak shot I can read &#8220;irardelli&#8221; on the package in the forground and see detail in the windmill. Looks like the light meter was trying to read the shadows in low ambient light which it correctly did. What about the flash performance of the Kodak, and the characteristics of the LCD&#8230;does it gain up in low light, is it fairly easy to read in sunlight? Is there any purple fringing across the zoom range? Is distortion at wide and telephoto extremes very significant? Whats your background in photography? Are you really competant at helping the public to evaluate cameras? Don&#8217;t answer that because I&#8217;m sure that John is Bigg on himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CrunchGear &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Holidays 2006: The Season&#8217;s Best Point-and-Shoot Cameras</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/10/26/kodak-easyshare-c875-review/comment-page-1/#comment-16332</link>
		<dc:creator>CrunchGear &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Holidays 2006: The Season&#8217;s Best Point-and-Shoot Cameras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 15:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/10/26/kodak-easyshare-c875-review/#comment-16332</guid>
		<description>[...] Best All-Purpose: Kodak EasyShare C875 With its large, easy-to-read 2.5-inch LCD, 8-megapixel resolution and 5x optical zoom, the EasyShare C875 has a well-rounded feature set. Add to that 21 shooting modes, simple, straightforward controls and power supplied by two AA batteries, and this camera can be ready for any situation at any time. Check out our full review. $249 kodak.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Best All-Purpose: Kodak EasyShare C875 With its large, easy-to-read 2.5-inch LCD, 8-megapixel resolution and 5x optical zoom, the EasyShare C875 has a well-rounded feature set. Add to that 21 shooting modes, simple, straightforward controls and power supplied by two AA batteries, and this camera can be ready for any situation at any time. Check out our full review. $249 kodak.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gadget Mania &#187; Review-uri si teste: FinePix S6000fd, FinePix F31fd, Kodak V705, Kodak EasyShare C875, Casio Exilim EX-S770</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/10/26/kodak-easyshare-c875-review/comment-page-1/#comment-11673</link>
		<dc:creator>Gadget Mania &#187; Review-uri si teste: FinePix S6000fd, FinePix F31fd, Kodak V705, Kodak EasyShare C875, Casio Exilim EX-S770</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 06:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/10/26/kodak-easyshare-c875-review/#comment-11673</guid>
		<description>[...] Tot de la Kodak este si modelul EasyShare C875, la care a aparut recent o cronica pe CrunchGear. Camera este destinata incepatorilor si afiseaza un pret din gama low-end. Asta poate in US, pentru ca in Romania se gaseste pe Digital Mall la nu mai putin de 1030 RON. In ciuda celor 300 de RON in minus, C875 ofera un senzor optic de 8 megapixeli si un zoom de x5. Balanta se inclina insa atunci cand comparam rezultatul final - imaginile luate cu C875 duc lipsa de profunzime, de caldura a culorilor, de realism. Autorul articolului de pe CrunchGear recomanda aceasta camera foto &#8220;pentru bunica&#8221;, dar nu mai bine pui niste banuti in plus si-ti iei tu ceva valabil ? Ce nevoie are bunica de o camera digitala ? Incheiem cu Casio Exilim EX-S770, o ultracompacta cu design excelent si performante deloc rele, care are parte de un review pe digitalcamerareview.com. La cei doar 17 mm grosime (fara obiectiv), Exilim EX-S770 ofera imagini de buna calitate, cu rezolutie de 7.2 megapixeli si zoom optic x3. Calitatea imaginilor denota o camera potrivita pentru fotografii in lumina naturala si destul de &#8220;iertatoare&#8221; cu utilizatorii incepatori. Autorii review-ului au de facut doar cateva observatii minore pe marginea ergonomiei meniurilor camerei. Din pacate pretul de 400 USD in US (apx. 1100 RON) nu ne lasa sa visam prea mult. In Romania, S770 va fi probabil o camera scumpa pentru gama din care face parte, dovada si pretul de 1240 RON cu care se vinde acum generatia anterioare S600, cu senzor de 6 megapixeli si mai putine functionalitati. [Nota: Preturile semnalate erau valabile la data scrierii acestui articol] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tot de la Kodak este si modelul EasyShare C875, la care a aparut recent o cronica pe CrunchGear. Camera este destinata incepatorilor si afiseaza un pret din gama low-end. Asta poate in US, pentru ca in Romania se gaseste pe Digital Mall la nu mai putin de 1030 RON. In ciuda celor 300 de RON in minus, C875 ofera un senzor optic de 8 megapixeli si un zoom de x5. Balanta se inclina insa atunci cand comparam rezultatul final &#8211; imaginile luate cu C875 duc lipsa de profunzime, de caldura a culorilor, de realism. Autorul articolului de pe CrunchGear recomanda aceasta camera foto &#8220;pentru bunica&#8221;, dar nu mai bine pui niste banuti in plus si-ti iei tu ceva valabil ? Ce nevoie are bunica de o camera digitala ? Incheiem cu Casio Exilim EX-S770, o ultracompacta cu design excelent si performante deloc rele, care are parte de un review pe digitalcamerareview.com. La cei doar 17 mm grosime (fara obiectiv), Exilim EX-S770 ofera imagini de buna calitate, cu rezolutie de 7.2 megapixeli si zoom optic x3. Calitatea imaginilor denota o camera potrivita pentru fotografii in lumina naturala si destul de &#8220;iertatoare&#8221; cu utilizatorii incepatori. Autorii review-ului au de facut doar cateva observatii minore pe marginea ergonomiei meniurilor camerei. Din pacate pretul de 400 USD in US (apx. 1100 RON) nu ne lasa sa visam prea mult. In Romania, S770 va fi probabil o camera scumpa pentru gama din care face parte, dovada si pretul de 1240 RON cu care se vinde acum generatia anterioare S600, cu senzor de 6 megapixeli si mai putine functionalitati. [Nota: Preturile semnalate erau valabile la data scrierii acestui articol] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canon rebel xt &#187; Canon rebel xt - Kodak EasyShare C875 Review</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/10/26/kodak-easyshare-c875-review/comment-page-1/#comment-10060</link>
		<dc:creator>canon rebel xt &#187; Canon rebel xt - Kodak EasyShare C875 Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 13:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/10/26/kodak-easyshare-c875-review/#comment-10060</guid>
		<description>[...] Kodak EasyShare C875 ReviewCrunchGear,&#160;NY&#160;- 52 minutes ago&#8230; Here, for example, is a scene taken with a Canon Digital Rebel XT. Go ahead. Yell at me. Say I m comparing a Pinto to a Ferrari. &#8230;    &#187; Permalink [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kodak EasyShare C875 ReviewCrunchGear,&nbsp;NY&nbsp;- 52 minutes ago&#8230; Here, for example, is a scene taken with a Canon Digital Rebel XT. Go ahead. Yell at me. Say I m comparing a Pinto to a Ferrari. &#8230;    &raquo; Permalink [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piranha Daily News &#187; Review: Kodak EasyShare C875</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/10/26/kodak-easyshare-c875-review/comment-page-1/#comment-10057</link>
		<dc:creator>Piranha Daily News &#187; Review: Kodak EasyShare C875</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 13:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/10/26/kodak-easyshare-c875-review/#comment-10057</guid>
		<description>[...] Read More&#8230;      &#171; Piranha Daily News Feedback Request: Copyright In Blog Age &#160; CES International Show 2007 is Coming! &#187; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read More&#8230;      &laquo; Piranha Daily News Feedback Request: Copyright In Blog Age &nbsp; CES International Show 2007 is Coming! &raquo; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
