<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPhone to Feature OS X?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/11/27/iphone-to-feature-os-x/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/11/27/iphone-to-feature-os-x/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 08:01:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blake Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/11/27/iphone-to-feature-os-x/comment-page-1/#comment-28326</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 02:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/11/27/iphone-to-feature-os-x/#comment-28326</guid>
		<description>KingMowCow.

Yea, we weren&#039;t claiming that that image was authentic. It&#039;s one of those fake images that popped up earlier in the year. It&#039;s just the first iPhone image I fell upon.

Ross,

That&#039;s an interesting point. I hadn&#039;t thought of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KingMowCow.</p>
<p>Yea, we weren&#8217;t claiming that that image was authentic. It&#8217;s one of those fake images that popped up earlier in the year. It&#8217;s just the first iPhone image I fell upon.</p>
<p>Ross,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s an interesting point. I hadn&#8217;t thought of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/11/27/iphone-to-feature-os-x/comment-page-1/#comment-28323</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 01:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/11/27/iphone-to-feature-os-x/#comment-28323</guid>
		<description>C&#039;mon everyone... Has anyone else noticed that Apple has stacked up both the iTV and iPhone intros for 1Q next year ?  Why would they miss the holiday sales season unless they really had to ?  Does anyone think that they&#039;re not ready on the hardware side with either of these products ?  And while were at it, why hasn&#039;t the 6G iPod shipped yet?

You have to believe that they&#039;re all Leopard-based, and none can ship until its out the door.  Apple almost has to go down this path because if not, they&#039;d have three OS&#039;es to support (Leopard, iPod OS, and iPhone / iTV OS), but all sharing common apps and comms.  This would be a geometric explosion in dev and support costs.  With a common platform (kernel), they get leverage in lots of ways.

They just have to wait for it to get done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C&#8217;mon everyone&#8230; Has anyone else noticed that Apple has stacked up both the iTV and iPhone intros for 1Q next year ?  Why would they miss the holiday sales season unless they really had to ?  Does anyone think that they&#8217;re not ready on the hardware side with either of these products ?  And while were at it, why hasn&#8217;t the 6G iPod shipped yet?</p>
<p>You have to believe that they&#8217;re all Leopard-based, and none can ship until its out the door.  Apple almost has to go down this path because if not, they&#8217;d have three OS&#8217;es to support (Leopard, iPod OS, and iPhone / iTV OS), but all sharing common apps and comms.  This would be a geometric explosion in dev and support costs.  With a common platform (kernel), they get leverage in lots of ways.</p>
<p>They just have to wait for it to get done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KingMooCow</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/11/27/iphone-to-feature-os-x/comment-page-1/#comment-28284</link>
		<dc:creator>KingMooCow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 00:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/11/27/iphone-to-feature-os-x/#comment-28284</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to say that&#039;s a fake or superimposed photo of that phone.   The keyboard looks identical to the touchscreen keyboard on my T-Mobile MDA, with a pretty simple windowblinds-type theme running on it.

I think it&#039;d be as cool as the next guy  but I don&#039;t think that&#039;s it -- yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to say that&#8217;s a fake or superimposed photo of that phone.   The keyboard looks identical to the touchscreen keyboard on my T-Mobile MDA, with a pretty simple windowblinds-type theme running on it.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;d be as cool as the next guy  but I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s it &#8212; yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathew</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/11/27/iphone-to-feature-os-x/comment-page-1/#comment-28227</link>
		<dc:creator>mathew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 21:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/11/27/iphone-to-feature-os-x/#comment-28227</guid>
		<description>Well, I&#039;d love if they could slim down OS X into something that might plausibly run on a phone and have decent performance... but I&#039;m not holding my breath.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;d love if they could slim down OS X into something that might plausibly run on a phone and have decent performance&#8230; but I&#8217;m not holding my breath.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
