<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Psiphon Project to Thwart Internet Censorship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/11/27/psiphon-project-to-thwart-internet-censorship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/11/27/psiphon-project-to-thwart-internet-censorship/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:26:03 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jt</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/11/27/psiphon-project-to-thwart-internet-censorship/comment-page-1/#comment-33572</link>
		<dc:creator>jt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 20:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/11/27/psiphon-project-to-thwart-internet-censorship/#comment-33572</guid>
		<description>just curious, what&#039;s wrong with the word hacktivist? heh :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just curious, what&#8217;s wrong with the word hacktivist? heh :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Hage</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/11/27/psiphon-project-to-thwart-internet-censorship/comment-page-1/#comment-30087</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Hage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 17:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/11/27/psiphon-project-to-thwart-internet-censorship/#comment-30087</guid>
		<description>Both autocratic and democratic governments are adopting filtering technologies to deny Internet content to their citizens.  

There are few media usages as abhorrent as child pornography and publishers and users should be prosecuted vigorously. Watermark technologies can flag such users and result in prosecution.

&#039;psiphon&#039; serves the world citizen by denying governments the opportunity to censor their citizens&#039; rights to knowledge and political thought.

NetRightsAdvocates.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both autocratic and democratic governments are adopting filtering technologies to deny Internet content to their citizens.  </p>
<p>There are few media usages as abhorrent as child pornography and publishers and users should be prosecuted vigorously. Watermark technologies can flag such users and result in prosecution.</p>
<p>&#8216;psiphon&#8217; serves the world citizen by denying governments the opportunity to censor their citizens&#8217; rights to knowledge and political thought.</p>
<p>NetRightsAdvocates.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Chernikov</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/11/27/psiphon-project-to-thwart-internet-censorship/comment-page-1/#comment-28353</link>
		<dc:creator>George Chernikov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 02:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/11/27/psiphon-project-to-thwart-internet-censorship/#comment-28353</guid>
		<description>What about content that is considered to be illegal in some parts of the &#039;free world&#039; but not others (for example, child pornography in Canada)? Will Psiphon facilitate access to such sites as well? I know that freedom of speech and information can often be a double-edged sword, but I do have to wonder who will bear the brunt of any legal action that may result from the user of Psiphon - the server provider or the actual user?

I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if software like this eventually resulted in renewed calls for establishing a global body to control the Interenet (of course, one where China would have a strong voice).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about content that is considered to be illegal in some parts of the &#8216;free world&#8217; but not others (for example, child pornography in Canada)? Will Psiphon facilitate access to such sites as well? I know that freedom of speech and information can often be a double-edged sword, but I do have to wonder who will bear the brunt of any legal action that may result from the user of Psiphon &#8211; the server provider or the actual user?</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if software like this eventually resulted in renewed calls for establishing a global body to control the Interenet (of course, one where China would have a strong voice).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webonics</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/11/27/psiphon-project-to-thwart-internet-censorship/comment-page-1/#comment-28320</link>
		<dc:creator>webonics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 01:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/11/27/psiphon-project-to-thwart-internet-censorship/#comment-28320</guid>
		<description>I wonder if this open-source technology would violate the law.  I mean isn&#039;t it equivalent to providing cable to your neighbor illegally?  Could you be held liable by your ISP?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if this open-source technology would violate the law.  I mean isn&#8217;t it equivalent to providing cable to your neighbor illegally?  Could you be held liable by your ISP?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
