<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zune May Stand A Chance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/11/30/zune-may-stand-a-chance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/11/30/zune-may-stand-a-chance/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:21:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reg</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/11/30/zune-may-stand-a-chance/comment-page-1/#comment-30340</link>
		<dc:creator>Reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 01:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/11/30/zune-may-stand-a-chance/#comment-30340</guid>
		<description>&gt; &quot;We don’t want Microsoft to release a new Zune every few months the way Apple does its iPod.&quot;

That statement makes no sense.  I&#039;m not alone in being bitterly disappointed that Apple has no new iPod for me to buy this Christmas.  

I bought a 5th gen 60GB iPod last year - it&#039;s now been well over a year and they haven&#039;t brought out the next generation.  After a year they simply bumped the storage to 80GB and added a brighter screen part.  Most firmware tweaks carried down to the year old model anyway.  No incentive to upgrade at all. 

And if you look at the lesser iPods:  the Nano is really the same Nano in a different shell (all over anodized aluminum instead of half stainless steel + half lucite), but it also took well over a year to be changed.

The 1st gen Shuffle was out in Jan 2005, which is 23 months ago, and has only recently been replaced with the 2nd gen tie-clip model.

So the statement that Apple is constantly bringing out new models that supplant the old ones is just wrong.

In fact, I was so peeved Apple has been tardy in bringing out the &quot;true video iPod&quot; as the Engadget kids call it, I was consider buying a Zune, which does have newer features than the 5G iPod.  

However, I&#039;ll at least hold on until January now, given that the Zune&#039;s new features are really non-features and the overall package is such a version 1 disaster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; &#8220;We don’t want Microsoft to release a new Zune every few months the way Apple does its iPod.&#8221;</p>
<p>That statement makes no sense.  I&#8217;m not alone in being bitterly disappointed that Apple has no new iPod for me to buy this Christmas.  </p>
<p>I bought a 5th gen 60GB iPod last year &#8211; it&#8217;s now been well over a year and they haven&#8217;t brought out the next generation.  After a year they simply bumped the storage to 80GB and added a brighter screen part.  Most firmware tweaks carried down to the year old model anyway.  No incentive to upgrade at all. </p>
<p>And if you look at the lesser iPods:  the Nano is really the same Nano in a different shell (all over anodized aluminum instead of half stainless steel + half lucite), but it also took well over a year to be changed.</p>
<p>The 1st gen Shuffle was out in Jan 2005, which is 23 months ago, and has only recently been replaced with the 2nd gen tie-clip model.</p>
<p>So the statement that Apple is constantly bringing out new models that supplant the old ones is just wrong.</p>
<p>In fact, I was so peeved Apple has been tardy in bringing out the &#8220;true video iPod&#8221; as the Engadget kids call it, I was consider buying a Zune, which does have newer features than the 5G iPod.  </p>
<p>However, I&#8217;ll at least hold on until January now, given that the Zune&#8217;s new features are really non-features and the overall package is such a version 1 disaster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webonics</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/11/30/zune-may-stand-a-chance/comment-page-1/#comment-30046</link>
		<dc:creator>webonics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 16:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/11/30/zune-may-stand-a-chance/#comment-30046</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve seen this posted anywhere before, but one issue that I&#039;ve found with the Zune is the integrated FM tuner.  I&#039;ve noticed that many local stations broadcasting in digital have feedback and noise in the background.  And depending on which way you turn the device the feedback lessens or grows.  I hope its a firmware fix and not a problem with the internal antenna.

I&#039;m sure most of the issues will be resolved in time through firmware.  I totally agree with Raj that Microsoft should fix the device&#039;s issues via firmware rather than introducing a new unit with new features and upgrades.  The latter will just alienate and erode their initial install base from future purchases.

I&#039;ve run into a few quirks in the Zune/Marketplace software, but the device itself is pretty great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve seen this posted anywhere before, but one issue that I&#8217;ve found with the Zune is the integrated FM tuner.  I&#8217;ve noticed that many local stations broadcasting in digital have feedback and noise in the background.  And depending on which way you turn the device the feedback lessens or grows.  I hope its a firmware fix and not a problem with the internal antenna.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure most of the issues will be resolved in time through firmware.  I totally agree with Raj that Microsoft should fix the device&#8217;s issues via firmware rather than introducing a new unit with new features and upgrades.  The latter will just alienate and erode their initial install base from future purchases.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve run into a few quirks in the Zune/Marketplace software, but the device itself is pretty great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Biggs</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/11/30/zune-may-stand-a-chance/comment-page-1/#comment-30027</link>
		<dc:creator>John Biggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/11/30/zune-may-stand-a-chance/#comment-30027</guid>
		<description>Sorry about that, guys. We&#039;re trying to copy edit all this stuff as it comes out, but things sometimes sneak through.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry about that, guys. We&#8217;re trying to copy edit all this stuff as it comes out, but things sometimes sneak through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ant</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/11/30/zune-may-stand-a-chance/comment-page-1/#comment-29921</link>
		<dc:creator>Ant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 12:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/11/30/zune-may-stand-a-chance/#comment-29921</guid>
		<description>Well said Masseyis.  I completely agree.  I want to find out about the gear without having to interpret the bad writing.  That said, I love the site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said Masseyis.  I completely agree.  I want to find out about the gear without having to interpret the bad writing.  That said, I love the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Masseyis</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/11/30/zune-may-stand-a-chance/comment-page-1/#comment-29885</link>
		<dc:creator>Masseyis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 11:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/11/30/zune-may-stand-a-chance/#comment-29885</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry. I know it&#039;s pedantic and irrelevant, but I&#039;ve cracked! I read CG every day, and it is by far and away my favourite feed, but this is about the third article this week that uses a phrase like &#039;couple weeks&#039;. 

It seems that like many Americans, you have forgotten the lowly genitive case that adds so much colour to our illustrious language. So please spare a thought for the word &#039;of&#039; this holiday season, as he seems to be forgotten. You wouldn&#039;t say &quot;I&#039;ve got a new pair socks&quot; so don&#039;t say &quot;launched the Zune a couple weeks ago&quot;

Thank you for letting me rant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry. I know it&#8217;s pedantic and irrelevant, but I&#8217;ve cracked! I read CG every day, and it is by far and away my favourite feed, but this is about the third article this week that uses a phrase like &#8216;couple weeks&#8217;. </p>
<p>It seems that like many Americans, you have forgotten the lowly genitive case that adds so much colour to our illustrious language. So please spare a thought for the word &#8216;of&#8217; this holiday season, as he seems to be forgotten. You wouldn&#8217;t say &#8220;I&#8217;ve got a new pair socks&#8221; so don&#8217;t say &#8220;launched the Zune a couple weeks ago&#8221;</p>
<p>Thank you for letting me rant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
