<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel Says, &#8220;Standards, Schmandards&#8221;, Goes for 802.11n</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/12/01/intel-says-standards-schmadards-goes-for-80211n/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/12/01/intel-says-standards-schmadards-goes-for-80211n/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 06:30:45 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: drdrew</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/12/01/intel-says-standards-schmadards-goes-for-80211n/comment-page-1/#comment-31032</link>
		<dc:creator>drdrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 03:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/12/01/intel-says-standards-schmadards-goes-for-80211n/#comment-31032</guid>
		<description>Even though it&#039;s not &#039;official&#039; yet, keeping ahead of the curve is great for those who really care about this standard - bleeding edge geeks.  Plus, if the finalized, accepted standard is different, the fact that it&#039;s only a firmware update and not a hardware repurchase makes it a much easier decision (not to mention the edge they&#039;ll have over their competition with the extra time to tweak the hardware specs and bug fix real-world situations).  I like it; initiative in tech is not usually done by the big boys this early on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though it&#8217;s not &#8216;official&#8217; yet, keeping ahead of the curve is great for those who really care about this standard &#8211; bleeding edge geeks.  Plus, if the finalized, accepted standard is different, the fact that it&#8217;s only a firmware update and not a hardware repurchase makes it a much easier decision (not to mention the edge they&#8217;ll have over their competition with the extra time to tweak the hardware specs and bug fix real-world situations).  I like it; initiative in tech is not usually done by the big boys this early on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
