<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Macbook “Thin” Coming Soon?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/12/12/macbook-%e2%80%9cthin%e2%80%9d-coming-soon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/12/12/macbook-%e2%80%9cthin%e2%80%9d-coming-soon/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 06:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: OS11</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/12/12/macbook-%e2%80%9cthin%e2%80%9d-coming-soon/#comment-44142</link>
		<dc:creator>OS11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 02:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/12/12/macbook-%e2%80%9cthin%e2%80%9d-coming-soon/#comment-44142</guid>
		<description>yes, 12" is the sweet spot for many road warriors, no need for a huge, heavy 14" screen, even the MacBook's 13.3 is overkill for most tasks today. It's simply too wide to be usable on flights or just throw in a bag and go. 12" is the gold Apple, do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, 12&#8243; is the sweet spot for many road warriors, no need for a huge, heavy 14&#8243; screen, even the MacBook&#8217;s 13.3 is overkill for most tasks today. It&#8217;s simply too wide to be usable on flights or just throw in a bag and go. 12&#8243; is the gold Apple, do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/12/12/macbook-%e2%80%9cthin%e2%80%9d-coming-soon/#comment-43921</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 21:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/12/12/macbook-%e2%80%9cthin%e2%80%9d-coming-soon/#comment-43921</guid>
		<description>For many, 14" is still way too big to qualify as a "laptop" ... I've loved my 12" PB for 2 1/2 years now and have been mourning the loss of a truly portable Apple up to now. Get another screen if you need the visual  workspace AND portability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For many, 14&#8243; is still way too big to qualify as a &#8220;laptop&#8221; &#8230; I&#8217;ve loved my 12&#8243; PB for 2 1/2 years now and have been mourning the loss of a truly portable Apple up to now. Get another screen if you need the visual  workspace AND portability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/12/12/macbook-%e2%80%9cthin%e2%80%9d-coming-soon/#comment-37437</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 04:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/12/12/macbook-%e2%80%9cthin%e2%80%9d-coming-soon/#comment-37437</guid>
		<description>I just don't understand why they don't come out with a 14" Macbook pro. The 15" is just too big, and the 12"  is too small.

I'm a Thinkpad T62 user, and might consider Mac if it came in a 14"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just don&#8217;t understand why they don&#8217;t come out with a 14&#8243; Macbook pro. The 15&#8243; is just too big, and the 12&#8243;  is too small.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a Thinkpad T62 user, and might consider Mac if it came in a 14&#8243;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brklynsurfer</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2006/12/12/macbook-%e2%80%9cthin%e2%80%9d-coming-soon/#comment-36764</link>
		<dc:creator>Brklynsurfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 01:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2006/12/12/macbook-%e2%80%9cthin%e2%80%9d-coming-soon/#comment-36764</guid>
		<description>Those stats do make drool, but ...a Mac Pro without a graphics excelerator?  What is the point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those stats do make drool, but &#8230;a Mac Pro without a graphics excelerator?  What is the point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.218 seconds -->
