<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AT&amp;T Completing Cingular Merger, Confusing Mobile History Buffs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/01/02/att-completing-cingular-merger-confusing-mobile-history-buffs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/01/02/att-completing-cingular-merger-confusing-mobile-history-buffs/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 23:50:58 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Foo</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/01/02/att-completing-cingular-merger-confusing-mobile-history-buffs/comment-page-1/#comment-63559</link>
		<dc:creator>Foo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 22:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/01/02/att-completing-cingular-merger-confusing-mobile-history-buffs/#comment-63559</guid>
		<description>The more things change, the more they stay the same...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more things change, the more they stay the same&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/01/02/att-completing-cingular-merger-confusing-mobile-history-buffs/comment-page-1/#comment-61822</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 05:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/01/02/att-completing-cingular-merger-confusing-mobile-history-buffs/#comment-61822</guid>
		<description>This is a great article. It is amazing how things come around...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great article. It is amazing how things come around&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Hickey</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/01/02/att-completing-cingular-merger-confusing-mobile-history-buffs/comment-page-1/#comment-61515</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Hickey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 23:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/01/02/att-completing-cingular-merger-confusing-mobile-history-buffs/#comment-61515</guid>
		<description>Mathew! Thanks! A picture is, indeed, worth a thousand words, it seems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mathew! Thanks! A picture is, indeed, worth a thousand words, it seems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathew</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/01/02/att-completing-cingular-merger-confusing-mobile-history-buffs/comment-page-1/#comment-61509</link>
		<dc:creator>mathew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 23:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/01/02/att-completing-cingular-merger-confusing-mobile-history-buffs/#comment-61509</guid>
		<description>http://www.flickr.com/photos/meta404/319076886/

How they are related: AT&amp;T and AT&amp;T.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/meta404/319076886/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/meta404/319076886/</a></p>
<p>How they are related: AT&amp;T and AT&amp;T.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/01/02/att-completing-cingular-merger-confusing-mobile-history-buffs/comment-page-1/#comment-61438</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 21:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/01/02/att-completing-cingular-merger-confusing-mobile-history-buffs/#comment-61438</guid>
		<description>The old AT&amp;T Wireless used to have excellent service. The service deteriorated about the time of wireless number portability and the transition from TDMA + Analog to GSM. Until then, it would have been unthinkable for Cingular to take over AT&amp;T Wireless (which incidentally was not part of AT&amp;T).

Don&#039;t forget, AT&amp;T Wireless was the first wireless provider to offer nationwide plans, in my area people were trying to sign up for service in the next metro area over, which had AT&amp;T Wireless, since Cellular One didn&#039;t offer nationwide plans. Eventually AT&amp;T Wireless bought out the Cellular One network in my area. AT&amp;T Wireless was the corporate wireless provider of choice back then.

People have short memories. They look only at the last year of AT&amp;T Wireless, which was indeed horrible. A lot of that blame goes to NTT Docomo, which invested billions in AT&amp;T Wireless, with stipulations that let AT&amp;T down the path of destruction. AT&amp;T Wireless was all set to switch to CDMA from TDMA, a move that would have solved a lot of their technical problems related to under-capacity problems in key markets like NYC. Instead, at NTT Docomo&#039;s insistince, they went to the technologically inferior GSM system, and made things worse by keeping TDMA/AMPS at the superior 800 MHz frequency, and relegating GSM to the inferior 1900 MHz frequency. They alienated more customers by selling 1900 MHz only GSM phones, because they soon expanded their GSM service to 800 MHz, and all the people with the older phones were not able to take advantage of their entire network.

It&#039;s questionable that the Cingular brand has a lot of value anyway. Look at the various surveys on wireless quality, and Cingular is always last, or close to last.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The old AT&amp;T Wireless used to have excellent service. The service deteriorated about the time of wireless number portability and the transition from TDMA + Analog to GSM. Until then, it would have been unthinkable for Cingular to take over AT&amp;T Wireless (which incidentally was not part of AT&amp;T).</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t forget, AT&amp;T Wireless was the first wireless provider to offer nationwide plans, in my area people were trying to sign up for service in the next metro area over, which had AT&amp;T Wireless, since Cellular One didn&#8217;t offer nationwide plans. Eventually AT&amp;T Wireless bought out the Cellular One network in my area. AT&amp;T Wireless was the corporate wireless provider of choice back then.</p>
<p>People have short memories. They look only at the last year of AT&amp;T Wireless, which was indeed horrible. A lot of that blame goes to NTT Docomo, which invested billions in AT&amp;T Wireless, with stipulations that let AT&amp;T down the path of destruction. AT&amp;T Wireless was all set to switch to CDMA from TDMA, a move that would have solved a lot of their technical problems related to under-capacity problems in key markets like NYC. Instead, at NTT Docomo&#8217;s insistince, they went to the technologically inferior GSM system, and made things worse by keeping TDMA/AMPS at the superior 800 MHz frequency, and relegating GSM to the inferior 1900 MHz frequency. They alienated more customers by selling 1900 MHz only GSM phones, because they soon expanded their GSM service to 800 MHz, and all the people with the older phones were not able to take advantage of their entire network.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s questionable that the Cingular brand has a lot of value anyway. Look at the various surveys on wireless quality, and Cingular is always last, or close to last.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sydney</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/01/02/att-completing-cingular-merger-confusing-mobile-history-buffs/comment-page-1/#comment-61394</link>
		<dc:creator>Sydney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 20:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/01/02/att-completing-cingular-merger-confusing-mobile-history-buffs/#comment-61394</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that trashing the Cingular brand now would be a bit of a waste.  Its got strong recognition and I&#039;m not sure I know anyone who enjoyed the service of AT&amp;T wireless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that trashing the Cingular brand now would be a bit of a waste.  Its got strong recognition and I&#8217;m not sure I know anyone who enjoyed the service of AT&amp;T wireless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
