<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bloops: Cisco Sues Apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/01/10/bloops-cisco-sues-apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/01/10/bloops-cisco-sues-apple/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 22:45:47 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Foo</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/01/10/bloops-cisco-sues-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-67775</link>
		<dc:creator>Foo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/01/10/bloops-cisco-sues-apple/#comment-67775</guid>
		<description>You would think that the legal wonks at Apple would have worked this out with Cisco (to buy the iPhone trademark)  BEFORE launching that overpriced bloated music thingy (what is it? oh yeah!  A PHONE!).  Did Apple really think Cisco wouldn&#039;t notice or not care?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You would think that the legal wonks at Apple would have worked this out with Cisco (to buy the iPhone trademark)  BEFORE launching that overpriced bloated music thingy (what is it? oh yeah!  A PHONE!).  Did Apple really think Cisco wouldn&#8217;t notice or not care?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
