<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Interview With a Patent Attorney: The iPhone Case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/01/15/an-interview-with-a-patent-attorney-the-iphone-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/01/15/an-interview-with-a-patent-attorney-the-iphone-case/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 23:50:58 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nobody</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/01/15/an-interview-with-a-patent-attorney-the-iphone-case/comment-page-1/#comment-70250</link>
		<dc:creator>nobody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 22:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/01/15/an-interview-with-a-patent-attorney-the-iphone-case/#comment-70250</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve heard that the iPhone deal between Apple and Cisco was no where close because Cisco didn&#039;t ask for money.  Cisco wants a deal to get some interoperatibility of iTune with their Cisco equipments.  i.e. it wants a piece of Apple&#039;s pie.  I doubt such deal would ever get through.

I don&#039;t understand why Apple wants to get into this legal issue for this iPhone name.  Like the iTV vs. Apple TV name, I&#039;d like (Apple logo) phone better than iPhone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard that the iPhone deal between Apple and Cisco was no where close because Cisco didn&#8217;t ask for money.  Cisco wants a deal to get some interoperatibility of iTune with their Cisco equipments.  i.e. it wants a piece of Apple&#8217;s pie.  I doubt such deal would ever get through.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t understand why Apple wants to get into this legal issue for this iPhone name.  Like the iTV vs. Apple TV name, I&#8217;d like (Apple logo) phone better than iPhone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
