<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fox Sues the Little Guy Over Simpsons and 24</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/01/25/fox-sues-the-little-guy-over-simpsons-and-24/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/01/25/fox-sues-the-little-guy-over-simpsons-and-24/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 10:05:35 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/01/25/fox-sues-the-little-guy-over-simpsons-and-24/comment-page-1/#comment-76643</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 16:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/01/25/fox-sues-the-little-guy-over-simpsons-and-24/#comment-76643</guid>
		<description>Who is responsible for content on the internet? The provider or the user, I guess the choice has been made - don&#039;t blame the ISPs, don&#039;t blame the content providers... blame the individual who is breaking copyright laws, I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if YouTube washed its hands of this whole ordeal and provided the info - why not, it sets a precedent and finally resolved an ongoing issue with YouTube regarding legal matters (ei: we aren&#039;t responsible for content on our site, the users uploading stuff are). I would expect YouTube membership to tank as a result and the billionaire founders to retire somewhere nice - knowing they screwed google into overpaying for their site and the users for providing content as without neither party, they are NOTHING.

Jon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who is responsible for content on the internet? The provider or the user, I guess the choice has been made &#8211; don&#8217;t blame the ISPs, don&#8217;t blame the content providers&#8230; blame the individual who is breaking copyright laws, I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if YouTube washed its hands of this whole ordeal and provided the info &#8211; why not, it sets a precedent and finally resolved an ongoing issue with YouTube regarding legal matters (ei: we aren&#8217;t responsible for content on our site, the users uploading stuff are). I would expect YouTube membership to tank as a result and the billionaire founders to retire somewhere nice &#8211; knowing they screwed google into overpaying for their site and the users for providing content as without neither party, they are NOTHING.</p>
<p>Jon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
