
Let’s face it. You know Sony kicks ass. You totally had a wet dream back in the 1990s when you saw the PlayStation and when PS2 fever hit, you bum-rushed Target hoping to get one. So why so much hatred for the PS3? Because you’ve been spoiled.
To be quite frank, you need a time out. The previous PlayStation models fit well within your budget and had great launch titles to boot. Now the PS3 comes along and all of a sudden, you realize that you’re going to have to actually put in more than 15 hours a week at Burger King. You shouldn’t have to work more. I mean, the Nintendo Wii costs only $250! Why can’t the PS3 cost $300 with a free sports game?
Because the PS3 isn’t banking on the hopes that you’ll play a game where you drive a damned truck with a TV remote. No, the PS3 has a long future planned out for you. See, the Wii doesn’t output in high-def, it doesn’t come with a Blu-ray player, which alone would run you $500 plus and it doesn’t come with the power the PS3 packs.
When I got a PS3, I realized it didn’t have many good launch titles. In fact, all I wanted was Resistance: Fall of Man and Madden ‘07. Now what about the Wii or Xbox 360? The 360 I have no problems with. It’s the perfect console to buy right now and the console that anyone considering a next-gen system should purchase. But the Wii?
Sure, Zelda is great and all, but guess what: I don’t give a hoo-hoo about Link running through a forest for the 10th time trying to find some treasure or rescue Zelda. I’ve been done with that gaming concept since Ocarina of Time, thank you.
I know what you’re thinking right now. “This Nintendo-hating douche obviously hasn’t played the KILLER titles!” What killer titles would you be referring to? Surely you can’t mean the crap-tastic first-person shooters or the mindless games like Wario Ware or Wii Sports. Wii Sports can be fun, but going outside and playing two-hand touch football or boxing your friends after half a bottle of Jack is much more entertaining.
Back to the PlayStation 3, though. Resistance is a clutch game. Not only is the online play free, but for a launch title, it’s damn good. It reminds me of Halo Online set in a WWII era. And get this: the graphics are killer. Bet you had no idea, right? As for Madden, it’s a great game but it’s just Madden, so whatever. It’s good for when you and your buddies get drunk and want to scream at the TV while waiting for the pizza to get delivered.
I’m basically saying the Wii is a piece and you’re just too much of a fanboy to realize it. The PS3 is clearly the winner in the next-gen console war and it’s only a matter of time before all the good titles like Metal Gear Solid 4 and Killzone 2 come out and blow your hands off like a two-dollar M80 firecracker. I’ve got Blu-ray, Wi-Fi, wireless controllers that don’t make me look like I’m going into convulsions when I use them, HD output and a 60GB hard drive to store all my porn on. So go ahead and have fun spending countless hours with Zelda. I’m popping some Prozac, calling off work and spending quality time with some real next-gen games. Happy Friday.










I do have a HDTV (on my second one, in fact) and burger king aint got shit on me ;) (cept those king games I snagged for my XBOX360).
You can have next-gen graphics w/o the need for 1080p and hddvd/blu-ray atm.
I can afford a blu-ray player, but only idiots jump on that kind of tech with the showing it has right now, and the format war.
Trolling for traffic, are we?
The problem with buying the PS3 based on what Sony promises to do with the hardware later, is that historically Sony has overpromised and underdelivered. The PS2 had support for Firewire, a mouse and keyboard, USB, and a hard drive. We were promised –and what became of all that? Zilch, apart from Final Fantasy XI which finally used the hard drive–only to see Sony drop hard drive support from the console immediately.
Like it or not sony has 70% of the console market share that’s just as much as the ipod share of music players.
Look gamer kids at the end of the day it’s about the games and sorry to say this, but microsoft has failed, i mean i can now buy a brand new slimline ps2 for under $180 bucks australian and pick from a shit load of games and also play tittles you can get on the 360 , so please don’t give this shit about which console gonna have the most bullshit gimmicks or the most proccesing power because at the end of day if i pay $1000 bucks aus and can only play 3 good games then i’ve been fucking ripped off.
this is full of crap
Awesome stuff bro, you’re the man Vince!
Tell these net nerd pussies how its done, brother!
Vince smells like baby crap.
Get out of my head!
Go crawl back under your Sony fanboy rock and stop writing crap you obviously know nothing about. 360 games match PS3 games and there are more of them. No games for Wii apart from Zelda?? Please. Try Excite Truck, try Rayman Rayving Rabbids, try Red Steel, how about Metal Slug, or Super Monkey Ball?? Those are just launch games. Once Nintendo sets their famous franchises loose, you won;t believe what a huge jump in Wii sales there is going to be. Sorry fanboy, but whichever way you turn, attacking 360 or attacking Wii, you are destined to lose. Even if PS3 is the most powerful system, remember that Neo Geo was the most powerful system of the 16 bit era, hell I’ve seen 32 bit games that didn’t look as good as some Neo Geo titles, and they still failed. Having the most powerful console is no guarantee of success especially if you price yourself beyond the means of most gamers. Oh, and which PS2 launch titles did you think were so great?? I bought them all and they all suck. You obviously have no taste in games if you thought Fantavision and Street Fighter EX3 qualified as great games.
I can’t believe I missed this the first time through.
“::wipes chin:: Sorry I was, uh, busy. What were you saying?”
^^^^^^^^^Too busy sucking Sony’s pole to hear what anyone has to say.
LoL LoL
Too bad the games you listed, Madden and that other game, whatever it was, haven’t changed anything at all either! Same as Madden 06.
GG you lose fanboy
Blake eats penis and Wii for lunch.
All this talk about Blu-ray Vs HD-DVD, who’s gonna win?!?! and have sony shot themselves in the foot with the PS3????
Well the new Disc formats are both good in their own rights but only for DATA storage. when it comes to Movies, HD downloads will win. $40-$60 for a Blu-ray disc or $10 and a bit of download time to get the same quality resolution???? I have all my DVD collection on my PC and stream it to the TV so recently I’ve had a look at the new disc formats and the other options out there (WMV-HD, Divx HD, Etc.) and at the end of the day it’s ease of use and convenience that will sell the format, after all DVD took off because the space they take up is a fraction of what the VHS cassettes took up.
So IMO, SONY should have stuck with DVD for the time being and released the PS3 with the option to upgrade to the DISC WARS winner (Blu-ray OR HD-DVD). this is where Microsoft has the advantage…. they can back peddle if Blu-ray wins and say ‘Ooops we got it wrong here’s a Blu-ray addon for you 360s’.
As for the motion sensing controllers both, PS3 and Wii may be onto something there and again IF MS want to all they need to do is release an update and a motion sensing controller and there you have it all the features of the PS3 But with a bit more flexibility.
If you think that blu-ray is a waste, then you have not. A) seen it in person against HD-dvd, it puts it to shame! B) dont see the future of games and movie content and the size required to store it all, I mean who wants a 10 disc set of a favorite SEASON dvd or Hd-dvd when you could have it all on 1 blu-ray disc? I guess that is why sony doesnt have you run thier business.
I dont understand where all this hate from sony comes from, when they brought you FF7,resident evil, metal gear, guitar hero, god of war and TONS of the GREATEST GAMES EVER, besides old school Nintendo games (gotta give nintendo respect, “know your roots”)
walk into your nearest gamestop, eb games etc… and tell me how many playstation greatest hits still selling, then try and find some for xbox. . . go ahead ill wait lol. I belive this console war is between Sony and Nintendo, Nintendo will have the lead, but the system will only hold up for so long, and Sony will still be the hardcore gamers choice for console gaming, cause most hardcore players play on PC which has been doing online play far far longer, but when playing a console Sony is the choice for most. 360 will be scrap in a few years and once again need to upgrade like they had to with the original xbox. Playstation is still selling PS2 and even PSONE, which passes the ultimate test of time like ninteno, the test of TIME.
2007 – 2008 PS3 will pull away from 360 and wii and awwwing another generation of people and keeping its hardcore players on the edge of their seat.
Since when do we buy gaming consoles to watch movies. Don’t we buy consoles to play games? Duh! You guys are retards. Sony makes POS equipment. Stereos, consoles, TVs, controllers. Unreliable bullshit. Your PS3s will all crap out in 8 months just like every piece of sony equipment or console Ive ever owned.
No gamer out there can honestly say halo wasn’t the most ground breaking game of all time, will ps3 come out with a masterpiece worth the price of the console, because by god if i have to sell my ass night and day for one of these baby’s, golly gee bitch it better have a mighty big kick ass piece of magic game out.
Jay Wilson, you are not very familiar with the ps3’s capabilities. The blue ray player which is equiped with the ps3 does not only produce stunning movie quality but it also enables the games for ps3 to appear a lot more complex. e.g. you may be playing a first person shooter such as Resistance and you will notice that there is a lot of things happening at once all indiviually, also allows the games to be a lot larger in length and you can forget about games being in a dual disc package with blue-ray each game will be on an individual cd say goodbye to “disc 1 and disc 2″.
I would like to finish by saying to everyone that believes that xbox 360 is superior, that you should really wait about 2 years untill sony has had time to properly work with the technology and produce games that truely harness the power of the console, b4 commenting on which console delivers a better gaming experience.
Thankyou.
Vince… if you posted this on any forum on the intertubes, you’d be called a troll immediately.
Claiming the PS3 is compatible with 7,000 games is not a reason to buy the goddamned thing. It’s a reason to buy the PS2.
This is ridiculous. The PS3 is the best console ever from a technological standpoint. If technology is all you need to enjoy yourself, then fine. That’s funny to me, since technology doesn’t automatically make something more/less fun, but whatever.
However, no one knows whether the PS3 is/will be the best from a fun/gameplay standpoint because there aren’t any fucking games out for the thing yet. You fanbois – no matter what altar you worship at – are pathetic. I mean, really… I don’t own any of the current-gen systems. The 360 is interesting because of multiplayer and its nicely-sized library, the Wii is interesting because of the new control scheme, and the PS3 is interesting because… yeah. There isn’t anything yet.
Give the goddamned console a year to actually do something, you mouth-breathing Neanderthals. Then you can start talking your nonsense.
Why dont you stop sucking so much sony dick you fucking tard – I cant wait to see timecop on bluray.
Who cares about Blueray, or Cell – or any of the useless unused cunt shit fuck in it?
Sony shat all over the consumer and cunts like you keep coming back for more, you scat lovin piece of abortion scum.
Why bother even writing so much junk when you can just inject it into your arm, you coke head scum.
Learn how to read the future next time like me, and you will know not to start your article with ‘ps3 is teh rox’
Go to hell and die with hitler you commie nazi cunt faced jack off.
It’s mad funny that he’s like, stop being a Nintendo fanboy, when he is like the posterboy for why sony sucks. I do want a wii, and I have a 360. The 360 is all I need to get my true nextgen experience. The PS3 is losing exclusive games, and in the end, the PS3 and 360 will have the same games, so why shell out 600 bucks when I don’t really need a blueray player? I mean, as long as I can watch a DVD, and it looks alright, I’ll watch a DVD.
The Wii is not meant to have like the ultimate graphics. And yeah, some games are mad childish, but tell me you never enjoyed playing melee, or a good ole mario game. I play video games for fun, not so that I can see aliens chase me around on a big screen. Nintendo got it right, people want a good value, and they want fun. Sony got cocky, and said, we’re sony, people will shell out a lot of money for an overrated peice of crap.
One more thing. I love how people think the PS3 is doig well. If you can go out there and find a PS3 right now, that means its not doing well. Nintendo has made sooo many more Wiis, and you can’t find em anywhere. Do the math
This reviews sux so badly on so many levels. Another Sony fanboy, trying to defend his shitty prickstation 3 console.
talk to this wii fanboy about PS3!!!
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=74680916&MyToken=c5abde8e-7a58-4627-be5e-ee884431996e
Funny how they are pushing BLU-RAY so much..
I don’t agree with the comments made either..
“WII IS A PEICE”? yeah thats why they are killing it in sales..
price point is prolly the #1 reason PS3 is suffering but i played RESISTANCE and thought.. hmm.. a shitty looking HL2.. thats what it really felt like..
as for BLU-RAY.. i don’t think that will fly for 1 reason.. and its the same exact reason BETAmax didn’t take off.. the PORN INDUSTRY!.. Sony messed up and now the porn industry is behind HD-DVD, and we all know the porn industry does move a lot of disks..
I mean they backed the less powerful, less advanced VHS system and as u can see VHS won the war..
so yeah.. bash the WII.. proclaim PS3 to be the best.. and in hardware it is.. but to see who will win this war we will have to wait..
and i’ll just stick to my HL2 on my PC for now.. with mods upon mods.. and yeah.. then i may play a lil wii-sports.. cause i can!
last minute comment..
also the BLU RAY is REALLY slow.. developers are saying that already.. so that increased capacity.. yeah they just use it all to write the same part of the game in a few parts of the disk to cut down on the really slow seek times..
>This reviews sux so badly on so many levels. Another Sony fanboy, trying to defend his shitty prickstation 3 console.
so when I harsh on the wii fanboys who defend it are noble whereas when VV loves the PS3 he’s a fanboy?
Three words: You are pathetic.
Okay, so let’s get some facts right here. Who wants to pay $600 for a stupid console? Not me. HD graphics? Who cares. Blu-ray players? What if it fails & it will probably be shifted out in the future, because it’s too new & doesn’t conform to all the BD specs, so yes, newer movies will probably not work right. Also, a stand-alone player will probably offer better quality and functions and less buggy than the PS3 player. I’m serious here. And what if some movies never hit the Blu-eay and goes HD-DVD instead?
All about this power crap – Zelda, for one, shows that you don’t need it for a good title. All that downloading & media & linux crap? I’m sorry, but I have a computer (who doesn’t?) – and it does everything the PS3 can do – and better! And it doesn’t even consume as much power as the PS3! Gosh! Not to mention that Sony castrated the system when Linux can’t access the SPUs… umm, what power machine? Let’s face it – the PC will win here, hands down.
So what’s left? You’re a typical Sony fanboy. You just don’t realize that only the games matters. Nothing else. If the Wii gets all the good games, then yay, I’f throw everything else out. If the 360 – same there, if the PS3 – same there. I just can’t hate you typical Sony fanboys. Sony did things right with the PS1, Nintendo screwed up with the N64, giving the PS2 the advantage and now – face it – Sony is NOT the best – they’re simply another competitor.
listen all you fucking homo geeks the ps3 is best of all time, it pisses on the 360 and the wii is just an asshole console that will die in the ass when the ps3 starts bringing out the true sony next generation games, so eat me cunts.
Eat my cunts?
SONY ROCKS. btw im typin this on my sony psp. the 36O is great bt the PS3 is greater.o and the wii is just a gimmick that people will just get bored with within a year. GOW is shit… MGS all the way baby
“like a library of over 7000 compatible games”
Too bad a large portion of the good ones look worse on the PS3 ’cause the scaler Sony’s using apparently can’t scale interlaced resolutions correctly. Way to go Sony, seriously.
That has been fixed this week.
I can’t believe people are saying that the 360 has better graphics for less money than the ps3. Since when do consoles maximize the graphics within like 3 months?
If you compare the launch titles of both, the 360 isnt even close of having ps3’s graphics. I mean try to compare perfect dark zero and resistance and PGR3 and Motorstorm (yeah ok it’s only been released in Japan but still)
I like the 360, but most people who support it are like “OMG GEARS OF WAR” (which is an excellent and awesome looking game btw) but it took a long while before it was released. Personally i think it’s comparable to Resistance graphic-wise. The both have incredible graphics. OK GOW has better colors,an “action cam” that makes it look a bit better and i like the gore style of the game. On the other hand resistance has good physics, awesome weapons that makes (in my opinion) one of the best online multiplayer FPS on all consoles.
I also see every sony haters say that the PS3 is wayyyy to expensive. Well, if you’ve suscribed to Xbox Live, it’s a matter of time before you end up paying more than the PS3 costs. And don’t tell me bullshit about the ps3 online store, it had more stuff than the xbox had at the same time after their releases. And one doesn’t cost a penny.
Bottom line is that those 2 consoles are having a war between each other and it can only mean better games. But i think sony will win the war because of superior hardware and i am sure that they will suprise a LOT of people in the future.
It’s quite ironic that the best the Wii60 fanboys can come up with is: they’re making you buy technology you don’t need yet (Blu-Ray) & X360 games look just as good (if not better than some launch titles).
Both are true but I didn’t hear any xbots complain when the 360 came out and the initial Xbox was just left to die. So they actually forced the new console or not: doesn’t matter if you want it, but if you’re with MS then you have to spend 400b bucks! And I won’t even start on how the new Vista OS is making all others obsolete, yet again forcing itsself on you.
About why some X360 games play/look better: 1st generation PS3> 2nd generation X360. What did you expect? Just because the PS3 has the most potential that the launch games were all gonna look as stunning as Gears Of War? Heck no, but X360 launch games looked like utter crap (no exceptions) so Sony’s not doing too bad on that department. Just wait a year and THEN try comparing the graphics between the 2.
There’s a lot of other negativity about the PS3 that is really uncalled for. The worse of all are the idiots who claim the X360 or Wii have won the console war. Hell no! The world consists out of more parts than just the US, you know. And as history shows, Europe is the place where PS has made it’s greatest successes and also (eventually) sold the most of each of their consoles. So don’t be writing it off just yet!
Naturally a lot of Wii60 fanboys are going to think I’m totally biased – a sony fanboy. Wrong! I have friends with both the 360 and Wii and have played & enjoyed them both. But it’s nothing that can captivate me indefinitely. I’m sure as hell not gonna be one of the idiots that stands in line for the European launch. I’ll probably wait ’till there’s a price drop (400-450€ is a decent price) and then buy it. PS3 should also have a few good games out by then.
And one last thing: everyone is so thrilled to be able to say:”sony got too cocky, they’ll loose on their market share”. So? They’re still making money with the PS2, PSP and other electronic departments so it’s not that if they don’t have 60-70% of the market, they’ll go down for good. All that will happen is prices will come down quicker and games will also be less expensive (PS2 had the most expensive games – of X1, GC & PS2 – from it’s launch up to now, because it was the market leader and thus could afford it). They’ll actually be forced to be more consumer friendly, which will in turn draw a lot of people back, who were initially put of by the PS3’s high price.
As a future PS3 owner I’m looking ahead to good times!
You’ve clearly been taking too much of you’re prozac if u are happy with u’re overpriced Playstation 3. The PS3 may well be the best hardware technically, but guess what the N64 was better than the PSX. The XBOX was better than the PS2. So don’t be surprised if the PS3 finishes last, dead last!!!
pAULy^ wrotw:
“Jay Wilson, you are not very familiar with the ps3’s capabilities. The blue ray player which is equiped with the ps3 does not only produce stunning movie quality but it also enables the games for ps3 to appear a lot more complex. e.g. you may be playing a first person shooter such as Resistance and you will notice that there is a lot of things happening at once all indiviually, also allows the games to be a lot larger in length and you can forget about games being in a dual disc package with blue-ray each game will be on an individual cd say goodbye to “disc 1 and disc 2″.”
I work in the tech field, so I’ve been hands-on with the Blu-Ray for a little while now. It looks good, but you know what? As someone who just wants to play games, I shouldn’t have to swallow the cost of a Blu-Ray player. Sony should’ve given people an option, but of course, they’re attempting to force its format into our entertainment centers.
The other benefits that you mentioned – longer game lengths, a single disc instead of multiple, etc. – mean nothing for the types of games I play. Titles requiring 20,30, 40 hours to finish isn’t a game that I’d want to play anyway. No time.
Yes Jay i am aware of that but i was simply letting you know that Blue ray does infact improve the games of the ps3, it is not only used to improve movie quality. :)
A little something which has been said by many people in the industry, “Xbox 360 is like a respectable upgrade from xbox 1 similar to the jump from ps1 to ps2, the games of the xbox 360 are not true to the phrase of next gen but look more like slightly improved graphical games from the xbox1″ Playstation 3 is a next gen console, some of the games which are being released as launch titles are better in graphics than some of the games which have only recently been released on x360. considering this wait two years and then we shall see which console produces games which are true to the phrase Next-Gen.
Eric is an imbosile.
Thankyou.
Blu-ray is just amazing and if you say it sucks, then you need to get your ass at best buy and see it for yourself!
Quote from: pAULy^
January 28th, 2007 at 5:23 pm
A little something which has been said by many people in the industry, “Xbox 360 is like a respectable upgrade from xbox 1 similar to the jump from ps1 to ps2, the games of the xbox 360 are not true to the phrase of next gen but look more like slightly improved graphical games from the xbox1″ Playstation 3 is a next gen console, some of the games which are being released as launch titles are better in graphics than some of the games which have only recently been released on x360. considering this wait two years and then we shall see which console produces games which are true to the phrase Next-Gen.
Pauly, you are wrong on so many levels. First of all, independent game sites are stating the 360 has equal or better graphics and gameplay than the PS3. I posted a link above but here it is again. http://www.gamespot.com/features/6162742/index.html (also I like your ‘industry’ quote, have a source or link??). And PS3 developers have had their SDKs for as long as 360 developers, so don’t think this is because the 360 has been out a year longer. PS3 graphics will look better in 2 years, but so will the 360s. As for BluRay, I will say it again, it is not necessary for a game system. Even PC games use DVDs and those have better graphics and depth than console games. I would rather use 2, even 3 DVDs over a media format that isn’t around in 5 years.
So for high-def movies, yes BluRay is nice, but for a game system you’re wasting your money. Bethesda developers have even said BluRay hurts them because of its slower load time. They have had to duplicate data to help. So apparently Sony needs BluRay’s extra strorage just to compensate for its slow load time: http://gaming.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=7715.
So if you wanted next-gen gaming, it arrived last year with the 360. The PS3 offers nothing over it in gaming, don’t take my word for it, follow the links I posted. Sorry Sony tricked you. If you want next-gen movies, feel free to buy a PS3 or BluRay player. But in that case you’re probably a few years too early, and hopefully BluRay will win or you can lay your BluRay movies next to your Betamax movies. DVDs are fine for me until high-def players come out at reasonable costs and movies aren’t 30% more than DVDs – say in 2,3, or 4 years. Either way Sony screwed you. But you just keep waiting another two years like you said. I’ll be enjoying my 360 (and a damn Wii, if I can ever find one…).
P.S. To blu-ray. I don’t care, sorry. I have seen high-def movies and they are very nice. But not a huge deal to me, DVDs play great on my big-screen HDTV. When the price drops and the next-gen movie format clears up, I’ll get one. But it’s not necessary now, regardless of how Sony has stupidly tried to force the issue.
feel the passion
Vince Veneziani… You are a fuckin genius, honistly i’ve been waiting for someone like yourself to put everything i’ve been saying to everyone into one page… And fuck these douchebags who negatively commented they dont know shit… You are the Shit…
Actually, Blu-Ray is going to lose the high-def battle. Almost certainly. The only thing you’re PS3 is equipped with is at least $200 worth of equipment that will be useless in 2 years.
Also, no one’s buying the PS3. It’s not the “clear winner of the next-gen war” because its sales are tanking and no one cares enough about Sony brand loyalty to slap down $600.
I mean, $600 for Resistance? Resistance is good, but it’s not nearly up to par with Gears of War. In fact, Resistance is just an OK launch title that will be completely trampled by the great shooters coming out in the future.
And I think calling WarioWare “mindless” is just trying really, really hard to make it sound like no one cares about Nintendo. The truth is that WarioWare is better than any of the crap the PS3 is going to get within the next few months.
Regardless, in a few years Sony will have traveled the way of Sega and won’t be in the console market any more. You won’t love your PS3 so much any more because 3rd-party devs will have jumped ship, Blu-Ray will have fallen and the Cell will be masked by the wonderful world of DX10.
But at least yeh got Resistance, right?
just_gaming here is the quote mate;
“While techno-geeks can ponder forever the potential ramifications of the specs, Sony spoke most clearly through its impressive demos (both tech and also of actual games), showing the potent console at work. Make no mistake: the PlayStation 3 is utterly superior in graphics to the Xbox 360 from what has been shown.
What really set the PS3 apart from the 360 was its lighting and shadow effects. The first tech demo showed light absorption and subsurface refraction, highlighting how different surfaces react differently to lighting. For example, skin reflected a warmer glow due to the light being partially absorbed, while the eyes give off a realistically glassy reflection. The lighting model was advanced enough to even show high-intensity light glowing through the body (much as you’d see when you cover a strong light source with your fingers). Game demos such as Fight Night Round 3 implemented other graphics-hog effects such as soft shadows (where shadow edges look blurry at a distance). And like the 360, the PS3 also had bloom effects, light flooding and bump mapping.”
With that said i still believe that within two years time the games to be brought out by sony on the ps3 will be superior than those on 360. Sony will have the time to harness the sheer mindblowing power of the ps3 and work with unleashing the talent of the new state of the art RSX GPu by Nivdia.
Also do not forget that Sony has already began planning and possibly the early stages of creating the PLAYSTATION 4 which is apparently going to be released in ten years time considering that each console is given ten years before something is created to overshadow it. Although mind you in ten years time the graphics of the ps3 will be a lot better than what we are seeing today, it was the same deal with the ps2. When the ps2 was released the launch titles if anyone can still remember them differed greatly to titles recent titles such as Gran Turismo 4 in graphical content.
Great article. Unlike websites like gamespot that run biased gamers around in circles and feature their direction less and blind arguments like creditable facts, this is straight forward, to the point and backed by a clear mind. I hate gamespot, I’ll be visiting this site more often.
Off all the people who have posted here…how many of you guys/gals actually own a PS3..?? huh…?? I bet most of you are simply reading different articles and simply mentioning somebody else’s point of view. If you think 360 is better then go buy it…if you think the Wii is better then please be by guest and go for it…heck…I’ll even in stand in line at BestBuy at 3:00 AM to help you get one. But speaking for myself, I found the PS3 to offer the best features. If I keep on getting solid titles to play around with (and rent occasional BD movies)…then I am happy. Its a free world people…live and let live.
BTW..I have one more thing to mention.
How many of us spent a lot of $$$ building that super cool computers of ours…which in about 2 years has lost 75 % of its initial value ..?? Well..?? If you are spending on hi-tech products then chill…cuz they are going loose value anyway. Lets live in the present and stop speculating about the distinct future. I own a PS3 60G and am totally enjoying it !!!
“Backed by a clear mind”???
If you hate GS just because they disagree with this guy or give the PS3 bad press, that’s because this guy is very disagreeable and there’s a lot of bad press that the PS3 deserves. Like its almost completely unwarranted $600 pricepoint. If it weren’t for Resistance, the PS3 would be completely useless until MotorStorm comes out and everyone here knows it.
It’s OK for him to have his opinion, but Vince is a moron if he thinks that there’s absolutely no controversy to the quality of the PS3.
I own a PS3 60 GB and i am also fucking loving it!
I own a PS3 60 GB and i am also fucking loving it on my 60″ Sony LCD HD Tv.
“The truth is that WarioWare is better than any of the crap the PS3 is going to get within the next few months.”
ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!