<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Newsflash: Megapixels Don&#8217;t Mean Megapictures</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/02/08/newsflash-megapixels-dont-mean-megapictures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/02/08/newsflash-megapixels-dont-mean-megapictures/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:34:37 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mathew</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/02/08/newsflash-megapixels-dont-mean-megapictures/comment-page-1/#comment-97424</link>
		<dc:creator>mathew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 15:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/02/08/newsflash-megapixels-dont-mean-megapictures/#comment-97424</guid>
		<description>The stat that makes the most difference for most people will be the lens speed. Ironically, a lot of sites (e.g. dealcamera.com) don&#039;t even bother to list it. With a fast lens you can take pictures indoors without flash, take pictures on grey days without sensor noise, and so on. That makes a much bigger difference to image quality than either megapixels or the software you use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The stat that makes the most difference for most people will be the lens speed. Ironically, a lot of sites (e.g. dealcamera.com) don&#8217;t even bother to list it. With a fast lens you can take pictures indoors without flash, take pictures on grey days without sensor noise, and so on. That makes a much bigger difference to image quality than either megapixels or the software you use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonas</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/02/08/newsflash-megapixels-dont-mean-megapictures/comment-page-1/#comment-97088</link>
		<dc:creator>jonas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 08:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/02/08/newsflash-megapixels-dont-mean-megapictures/#comment-97088</guid>
		<description>&quot;I very rarely take pics with the maximum sharpness—they fill up your hard drive, look no better on a computer screen and I almost never print pics.&quot;

but what if you want to crop them? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I very rarely take pics with the maximum sharpness—they fill up your hard drive, look no better on a computer screen and I almost never print pics.&#8221;</p>
<p>but what if you want to crop them? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/02/08/newsflash-megapixels-dont-mean-megapictures/comment-page-1/#comment-96560</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 22:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/02/08/newsflash-megapixels-dont-mean-megapictures/#comment-96560</guid>
		<description>I have come to the same realization - now that I got my D40, I completely agree. Its the software behind the picture that makes the HUGE difference more then any megapixel this or that. The only advantage I can see towards additional megapixels is the software has more data to further optimize the image... and in this way, as long as the cpu can keep up, more is probably better although I am sure there is a law of diminishing returns regarding this as well.

Jon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have come to the same realization &#8211; now that I got my D40, I completely agree. Its the software behind the picture that makes the HUGE difference more then any megapixel this or that. The only advantage I can see towards additional megapixels is the software has more data to further optimize the image&#8230; and in this way, as long as the cpu can keep up, more is probably better although I am sure there is a law of diminishing returns regarding this as well.</p>
<p>Jon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
