http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/02/20/cnet-on-windows-mobile-6-better-but-not-yet-great/ Gadgets, gear and computer hardware. Tue, 01 Dec 2009 02:16:48 -0500 hourly 1 http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/02/20/cnet-on-windows-mobile-6-better-but-not-yet-great/comment-page-1/#comment-114633 Paul Murphy Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:27:11 +0000 http://crunchgear.com/2007/02/20/cnet-on-windows-mobile-6-better-but-not-yet-great/#comment-114633 Sure do remember, but do you really expect me to say just CE is better than WM6? :) haha... I look at this differently, if I wanted a simple OS for a smartphone, I probably wouldn't look at any of the leading smartphones. They're pushing the boundaries of what we can do while we're about. After all, that's why we're spending so much on the things... Sure do remember, but do you really expect me to say just CE is better than WM6? :) haha… I look at this differently, if I wanted a simple OS for a smartphone, I probably wouldn’t look at any of the leading smartphones. They’re pushing the boundaries of what we can do while we’re about. After all, that’s why we’re spending so much on the things…

]]> http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/02/20/cnet-on-windows-mobile-6-better-but-not-yet-great/comment-page-1/#comment-113580 Matt Hickey Tue, 20 Feb 2007 23:44:23 +0000 http://crunchgear.com/2007/02/20/cnet-on-windows-mobile-6-better-but-not-yet-great/#comment-113580 @ Paul: well, yes, technically. But remember when it was just CE? That was great sauce. @ Paul: well, yes, technically. But remember when it was just CE? That was great sauce.

]]> http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/02/20/cnet-on-windows-mobile-6-better-but-not-yet-great/comment-page-1/#comment-113526 Paul Murphy Tue, 20 Feb 2007 23:00:35 +0000 http://crunchgear.com/2007/02/20/cnet-on-windows-mobile-6-better-but-not-yet-great/#comment-113526 Actually, Windows Mobile 6 is built on top of Windows CE 5.0.... Actually, Windows Mobile 6 is built on top of Windows CE 5.0….

]]>