<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Skype Begs FCC To Open Cell Networks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/02/22/skype-begs-fcc-to-open-cell-networks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/02/22/skype-begs-fcc-to-open-cell-networks/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:50:26 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/02/22/skype-begs-fcc-to-open-cell-networks/comment-page-1/#comment-127998</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 11:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/02/22/skype-begs-fcc-to-open-cell-networks/#comment-127998</guid>
		<description>What ridiculous logic you employ. Of course Verizon will fight it, but it&#039;s by no means a foregone conclusion that they will win, so how can you state that there is &quot;no way&quot; skype will get anywhere with it?

More ridiculously, you apparently think it&#039;s a good thing to keep overpaying a wireless carrier for calls and services just so you can get a subsidised handset every few years? Wouldn&#039;t you just rather shell out 4 or 5 hundred bucks one time every 24 months and no longer have to pay 30, 40, 50 cents per minute for a call? I&#039;ve always wondered what kind of idiots were taken in by the mobile operators transparent marketing schemes -- it&#039;s frightening to see such ignorance in a consumer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What ridiculous logic you employ. Of course Verizon will fight it, but it&#8217;s by no means a foregone conclusion that they will win, so how can you state that there is &#8220;no way&#8221; skype will get anywhere with it?</p>
<p>More ridiculously, you apparently think it&#8217;s a good thing to keep overpaying a wireless carrier for calls and services just so you can get a subsidised handset every few years? Wouldn&#8217;t you just rather shell out 4 or 5 hundred bucks one time every 24 months and no longer have to pay 30, 40, 50 cents per minute for a call? I&#8217;ve always wondered what kind of idiots were taken in by the mobile operators transparent marketing schemes &#8212; it&#8217;s frightening to see such ignorance in a consumer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/02/22/skype-begs-fcc-to-open-cell-networks/comment-page-1/#comment-116523</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/02/22/skype-begs-fcc-to-open-cell-networks/#comment-116523</guid>
		<description>We don&#039;t seem to have a problem like this in the UK. Any WM5 or S60 phones that can run the existing mobile version have the option to use Skype over 3G and/or wifi networks.

Still, I hold my head high that at least there&#039;s still one place where Europe outdoes the US...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We don&#8217;t seem to have a problem like this in the UK. Any WM5 or S60 phones that can run the existing mobile version have the option to use Skype over 3G and/or wifi networks.</p>
<p>Still, I hold my head high that at least there&#8217;s still one place where Europe outdoes the US&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
