<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPhone Too &#8216;Spensive For Consumers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/02/23/iphone-too-spensive-for-consumers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/02/23/iphone-too-spensive-for-consumers/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 02:45:03 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: NURSINGHOMEMORTGAGE</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/02/23/iphone-too-spensive-for-consumers/comment-page-1/#comment-150440</link>
		<dc:creator>NURSINGHOMEMORTGAGE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 00:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/02/23/iphone-too-spensive-for-consumers/#comment-150440</guid>
		<description>A potential homebuyer could borrow the money for the down payment, but nobody but a fool (or a parent) would lend $25,000 or more unsecured</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A potential homebuyer could borrow the money for the down payment, but nobody but a fool (or a parent) would lend $25,000 or more unsecured</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob-sax</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/02/23/iphone-too-spensive-for-consumers/comment-page-1/#comment-142450</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob-sax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 17:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/02/23/iphone-too-spensive-for-consumers/#comment-142450</guid>
		<description>Great thanks! Best wishes.

http://amateur-allure.wrw1r.info</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great thanks! Best wishes.</p>
<p><a href="http://amateur-allure.wrw1r.info" rel="nofollow">http://amateur-allure.wrw1r.info</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jlewin</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/02/23/iphone-too-spensive-for-consumers/comment-page-1/#comment-120273</link>
		<dc:creator>jlewin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 00:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/02/23/iphone-too-spensive-for-consumers/#comment-120273</guid>
		<description>Vince

There&#039;s more to Compete&#039;s numbers than Yahoo&#039;s angle on the story.

Did you notice that 26% of the people Compete surveyed plan to buy an iPhone?

26%! That&#039;s an freakily high percentage!

With a 50% margin, all Apple has to do is get the pricing right and they could easily have a hit bigger than the iPod.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vince</p>
<p>There&#8217;s more to Compete&#8217;s numbers than Yahoo&#8217;s angle on the story.</p>
<p>Did you notice that 26% of the people Compete surveyed plan to buy an iPhone?</p>
<p>26%! That&#8217;s an freakily high percentage!</p>
<p>With a 50% margin, all Apple has to do is get the pricing right and they could easily have a hit bigger than the iPod.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Obvious One</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/02/23/iphone-too-spensive-for-consumers/comment-page-1/#comment-119690</link>
		<dc:creator>The Obvious One</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 14:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/02/23/iphone-too-spensive-for-consumers/#comment-119690</guid>
		<description>I remember people saying $399 was too expensive for the 1st iPod too (the later 10GB version was $499). All Apple wants with the 1G iPhone is to start the buzz. There are plenty of early adopters out there ready to shell out $600 (1% of a 300M U.S. population is still 3M.) If Apple can sell 1.5M 1G iPhones @ lanch they have an instant hit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember people saying $399 was too expensive for the 1st iPod too (the later 10GB version was $499). All Apple wants with the 1G iPhone is to start the buzz. There are plenty of early adopters out there ready to shell out $600 (1% of a 300M U.S. population is still 3M.) If Apple can sell 1.5M 1G iPhones @ lanch they have an instant hit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dl</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/02/23/iphone-too-spensive-for-consumers/comment-page-1/#comment-118900</link>
		<dc:creator>dl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 06:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/02/23/iphone-too-spensive-for-consumers/#comment-118900</guid>
		<description>Everyone I know, and I mean everyone... is excited about this phone.  At least 6 people are waiting with baited breath to buy, even ready to switch to Cingular.  Granted my circles are probably not the typical American consumer, but I remember when the RAZR not too long ago was around the same price.  It&#039;s natural to price high for early adopters.  Stupid polls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone I know, and I mean everyone&#8230; is excited about this phone.  At least 6 people are waiting with baited breath to buy, even ready to switch to Cingular.  Granted my circles are probably not the typical American consumer, but I remember when the RAZR not too long ago was around the same price.  It&#8217;s natural to price high for early adopters.  Stupid polls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karlana</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/02/23/iphone-too-spensive-for-consumers/comment-page-1/#comment-118756</link>
		<dc:creator>Karlana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 04:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/02/23/iphone-too-spensive-for-consumers/#comment-118756</guid>
		<description>You know, I don&#039;t know why one wouldn&#039;t shell out $500 for that phone when people are shelling out $300 for a PDA.  PDA phones cost $300+ and people shell money out for that, but wouldn&#039;t for an iPhone?

Granted, I wouldn&#039;t simply because I already own an iPod, which I spent $300 on, and I already have a cell phone.  However, if I didn&#039;t have an iPod, I&#039;d probably pay the bukly price tag.

May be....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I don&#8217;t know why one wouldn&#8217;t shell out $500 for that phone when people are shelling out $300 for a PDA.  PDA phones cost $300+ and people shell money out for that, but wouldn&#8217;t for an iPhone?</p>
<p>Granted, I wouldn&#8217;t simply because I already own an iPod, which I spent $300 on, and I already have a cell phone.  However, if I didn&#8217;t have an iPod, I&#8217;d probably pay the bukly price tag.</p>
<p>May be&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/02/23/iphone-too-spensive-for-consumers/comment-page-1/#comment-118538</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 00:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/02/23/iphone-too-spensive-for-consumers/#comment-118538</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t even pay $100 for a phone. I&#039;m cheap. 

...Now if I could torrent the phone into my hands some how, that&#039;s a whole other story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t even pay $100 for a phone. I&#8217;m cheap. </p>
<p>&#8230;Now if I could torrent the phone into my hands some how, that&#8217;s a whole other story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magellan</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/02/23/iphone-too-spensive-for-consumers/comment-page-1/#comment-118522</link>
		<dc:creator>Magellan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 00:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/02/23/iphone-too-spensive-for-consumers/#comment-118522</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t Jobs say all they wanted was 1% of the market? Seems like it&#039;s right on target for what Jobs was hoping for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t Jobs say all they wanted was 1% of the market? Seems like it&#8217;s right on target for what Jobs was hoping for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince Veneziani</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/02/23/iphone-too-spensive-for-consumers/comment-page-1/#comment-118500</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince Veneziani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 23:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/02/23/iphone-too-spensive-for-consumers/#comment-118500</guid>
		<description>Agreed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sascha</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/02/23/iphone-too-spensive-for-consumers/comment-page-1/#comment-118470</link>
		<dc:creator>Sascha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 23:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/02/23/iphone-too-spensive-for-consumers/#comment-118470</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t buy it. 379 people is nothing. Does the study say which kind of people they asked? Yeah, if you go to some 1,500 people town in the Mid West and ask those people if they are going to buy the iPhone, the answers won&#039;t look good. But go out on the street in San Francisco and ask 379 people, you will get completely different results.

The number is way too low to be representative. If a girl&#039;s scout sells mostly chocolate mint cookies to 379 people, does that mean all Americans love chocolate mint cookies?

Show me an online poll with a hundred thousand or a million votes, and I&#039;ll be willing to recognize a trend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t buy it. 379 people is nothing. Does the study say which kind of people they asked? Yeah, if you go to some 1,500 people town in the Mid West and ask those people if they are going to buy the iPhone, the answers won&#8217;t look good. But go out on the street in San Francisco and ask 379 people, you will get completely different results.</p>
<p>The number is way too low to be representative. If a girl&#8217;s scout sells mostly chocolate mint cookies to 379 people, does that mean all Americans love chocolate mint cookies?</p>
<p>Show me an online poll with a hundred thousand or a million votes, and I&#8217;ll be willing to recognize a trend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
