<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WTF? ISO 8000 on Kodak&#8217;s EasyShare Z885</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/03/09/wtf-iso-8000-on-kodaks-easyshare-z885/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/03/09/wtf-iso-8000-on-kodaks-easyshare-z885/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 03:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Terence</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/03/09/wtf-iso-8000-on-kodaks-easyshare-z885/#comment-285167</link>
		<dc:creator>Terence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 22:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/03/09/wtf-iso-8000-on-kodaks-easyshare-z885/#comment-285167</guid>
		<description>just bought the 885. compaired to my Canon 350D i really dont see much diference. high iso is absolute great ,Iso 800 noise almost invisible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just bought the 885. compaired to my Canon 350D i really dont see much diference. high iso is absolute great ,Iso 800 noise almost invisible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.195 seconds -->
