<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dvorak Sez iPhone Bat Dead in 40 Mins, Continues to Hit Magical Crack Pipe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/04/05/dvorak-sez-iphone-bat-ded-in-40-mins-continues-to-hit-magical-crack-pipe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/04/05/dvorak-sez-iphone-bat-ded-in-40-mins-continues-to-hit-magical-crack-pipe/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:14:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/04/05/dvorak-sez-iphone-bat-ded-in-40-mins-continues-to-hit-magical-crack-pipe/comment-page-1/#comment-178311</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 09:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/04/05/dvorak-sez-iphone-bat-ded-in-40-mins-continues-to-hit-magical-crack-pipe/#comment-178311</guid>
		<description>lol sucked in</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol sucked in</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huh?</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/04/05/dvorak-sez-iphone-bat-ded-in-40-mins-continues-to-hit-magical-crack-pipe/comment-page-1/#comment-177858</link>
		<dc:creator>Huh?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 00:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/04/05/dvorak-sez-iphone-bat-ded-in-40-mins-continues-to-hit-magical-crack-pipe/#comment-177858</guid>
		<description>No, no, no. That Cingular guy was testing the prototype of the &quot;3G&quot; iPhone that will be out in 20 years from now. Man, have you ever use a 3G phone, it sucks up the battery in seconds.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, no, no. That Cingular guy was testing the prototype of the &#8220;3G&#8221; iPhone that will be out in 20 years from now. Man, have you ever use a 3G phone, it sucks up the battery in seconds.  ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/04/05/dvorak-sez-iphone-bat-ded-in-40-mins-continues-to-hit-magical-crack-pipe/comment-page-1/#comment-176276</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/04/05/dvorak-sez-iphone-bat-ded-in-40-mins-continues-to-hit-magical-crack-pipe/#comment-176276</guid>
		<description>I hope that battery is LOT smaller. I don&#039;t believe the 40 minutes but regardless of the actual battery life I doubt very much that it will be magically long and not being able to slip another battery in is incredibly lame and possibly pretty disasterous. I don&#039;t know anyone with a smart phone that doesn&#039;t have a 2nd battery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope that battery is LOT smaller. I don&#8217;t believe the 40 minutes but regardless of the actual battery life I doubt very much that it will be magically long and not being able to slip another battery in is incredibly lame and possibly pretty disasterous. I don&#8217;t know anyone with a smart phone that doesn&#8217;t have a 2nd battery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webonics</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/04/05/dvorak-sez-iphone-bat-ded-in-40-mins-continues-to-hit-magical-crack-pipe/comment-page-1/#comment-176184</link>
		<dc:creator>webonics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 21:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/04/05/dvorak-sez-iphone-bat-ded-in-40-mins-continues-to-hit-magical-crack-pipe/#comment-176184</guid>
		<description>Excuse me if I&#039;ve missed this in an earlier post, but I thought the iPhone (according to Kevin Rose on DiggNation) was supposed to launch with a dual battery setup that separated powersourcing for the phone functions from the iPod functionality.  Was this &quot;rumor&quot; determined to be bogus?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excuse me if I&#8217;ve missed this in an earlier post, but I thought the iPhone (according to Kevin Rose on DiggNation) was supposed to launch with a dual battery setup that separated powersourcing for the phone functions from the iPod functionality.  Was this &#8220;rumor&#8221; determined to be bogus?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theworldcries</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/04/05/dvorak-sez-iphone-bat-ded-in-40-mins-continues-to-hit-magical-crack-pipe/comment-page-1/#comment-176098</link>
		<dc:creator>theworldcries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 20:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/04/05/dvorak-sez-iphone-bat-ded-in-40-mins-continues-to-hit-magical-crack-pipe/#comment-176098</guid>
		<description>Beta test iPhones use a smaller battery, to reduce development costs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beta test iPhones use a smaller battery, to reduce development costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
