<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scientists Call Out D-Wave Systems&#8217; Quantum Computer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/04/09/scientists-call-out-d-wave-systems-quantum-computer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/04/09/scientists-call-out-d-wave-systems-quantum-computer/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 08:01:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Ballado</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/04/09/scientists-call-out-d-wave-systems-quantum-computer/comment-page-1/#comment-208092</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Ballado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 16:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/04/09/scientists-call-out-d-wave-systems-quantum-computer/#comment-208092</guid>
		<description>I, for one, am skeptical of D-Wave&#039;s claims. Quantum computing, as far as I remember, has been something that even its mere plausibility has been questioned.

I&#039;ve heard 3 years ago about &quot;possible&quot; 2 or 3-qubit computers. To unleash a 16-qubit computer sounds pretty fast for me... much like Peron&#039;s announcement that his government had built a new fusion power plant ... back in the 50&#039;s. Yeah, sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, for one, am skeptical of D-Wave&#8217;s claims. Quantum computing, as far as I remember, has been something that even its mere plausibility has been questioned.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard 3 years ago about &#8220;possible&#8221; 2 or 3-qubit computers. To unleash a 16-qubit computer sounds pretty fast for me&#8230; much like Peron&#8217;s announcement that his government had built a new fusion power plant &#8230; back in the 50&#8217;s. Yeah, sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan DeVaughn</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/04/09/scientists-call-out-d-wave-systems-quantum-computer/comment-page-1/#comment-192094</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan DeVaughn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 23:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/04/09/scientists-call-out-d-wave-systems-quantum-computer/#comment-192094</guid>
		<description>&quot;Potential charade&quot;?  Give us a break, already.   Visit www.dwavesys.com, where the company&#039;s launch, February 13, 15 is fully and carefully documented.  Read the materials, including the press release, carefully. Then view the scientists from Harvard and Jet Propulsion Lab commenting on video.  Judge for yourself.  &quot;Charade&quot;?  Doubtful.  Rush to judgement by competing scientists?  Likely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Potential charade&#8221;?  Give us a break, already.   Visit <a href="http://www.dwavesys.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.dwavesys.com</a>, where the company&#8217;s launch, February 13, 15 is fully and carefully documented.  Read the materials, including the press release, carefully. Then view the scientists from Harvard and Jet Propulsion Lab commenting on video.  Judge for yourself.  &#8220;Charade&#8221;?  Doubtful.  Rush to judgement by competing scientists?  Likely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Simkiss</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/04/09/scientists-call-out-d-wave-systems-quantum-computer/comment-page-1/#comment-190594</link>
		<dc:creator>John Simkiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 02:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/04/09/scientists-call-out-d-wave-systems-quantum-computer/#comment-190594</guid>
		<description>Hi Nicholas:

The article says that D-Wave is offering Orion as a web service, not a web server.  There is an ENORMOUS difference between the two.

jas3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nicholas:</p>
<p>The article says that D-Wave is offering Orion as a web service, not a web server.  There is an ENORMOUS difference between the two.</p>
<p>jas3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon Fierce</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/04/09/scientists-call-out-d-wave-systems-quantum-computer/comment-page-1/#comment-189524</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Fierce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 17:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/04/09/scientists-call-out-d-wave-systems-quantum-computer/#comment-189524</guid>
		<description>Do you even know what you&#039;re talking about? The reason The Orion is such a breakthrough is because it&#039;s the most complex to date. That doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s &quot;too powerful to be made practical&quot;. It can&#039;t even keep up with an average PC. There is no &quot;Miracle Computer&quot;, but like Chris.Harding said, it&#039;s got 16 qubits, thus being the most powerful quantum computer ever made. I think you need to keep your facts straight and not try to compare it to theoretical computers that don&#039;t exist.
-Fierce</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you even know what you&#8217;re talking about? The reason The Orion is such a breakthrough is because it&#8217;s the most complex to date. That doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s &#8220;too powerful to be made practical&#8221;. It can&#8217;t even keep up with an average PC. There is no &#8220;Miracle Computer&#8221;, but like Chris.Harding said, it&#8217;s got 16 qubits, thus being the most powerful quantum computer ever made. I think you need to keep your facts straight and not try to compare it to theoretical computers that don&#8217;t exist.<br />
-Fierce</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris. harding</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/04/09/scientists-call-out-d-wave-systems-quantum-computer/comment-page-1/#comment-183713</link>
		<dc:creator>chris. harding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 00:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/04/09/scientists-call-out-d-wave-systems-quantum-computer/#comment-183713</guid>
		<description>Dear All:
Get off the backs of D-Wave. It is only 16 Q-B but it is scaleable. We should be congratulating  the D-Wave team !.
Chris. Harding</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear All:<br />
Get off the backs of D-Wave. It is only 16 Q-B but it is scaleable. We should be congratulating  the D-Wave team !.<br />
Chris. Harding</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
