The Independent has a nice doom and gloom piece today, reporting that Wi-Fi could be more damaging to your health than cellphones are (which assumes that cellphones are, in fact, dangerous). And since Wi-Fi is everywhere, we’re all at risk. Never mind that radio waves have saturated the atmosphere for many, many years now and I haven’t seen any zombies running around yet.
The crux of the argument seems to focus on Wi-Fi being completely unstudied. Since we don’t know what Wi-Fi does, we must automatically assume it’s bad. Here’s an idea: how about instead of needlessly scaring the public, you hold off on publishing such articles until credible studies have been released supporting your bombastic postulations?
Danger on the airwaves: Is the Wi-Fi revolution a health time bomb? [The Independent]
The problem is people don’t trust government or the industry to have their health as a priority. The Monsanto corporation is a good example of that…
So, if there was a danger, I do not trust our current bought and paid for science, that is why independent researchers are becoming more popular.
There are studies that support these ‘bombastic postulations’, if you search for them. The effect measured in lab animals were disastrous. No human testing was done, as that would be immoral.