<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 80GB PS3 Is For Real, Dare We Say In the Wild?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/04/25/80gb-ps3-is-for-real-dare-we-say-in-the-wild/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/04/25/80gb-ps3-is-for-real-dare-we-say-in-the-wild/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 19:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/04/25/80gb-ps3-is-for-real-dare-we-say-in-the-wild/#comment-553906</link>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 18:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/04/25/80gb-ps3-is-for-real-dare-we-say-in-the-wild/#comment-553906</guid>
		<description>In past tense, well you were full of shit!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In past tense, well you were full of shit!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/04/25/80gb-ps3-is-for-real-dare-we-say-in-the-wild/#comment-549160</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 14:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/04/25/80gb-ps3-is-for-real-dare-we-say-in-the-wild/#comment-549160</guid>
		<description>YOUR A TOOL AND LIAR GET A JOB SONY REP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YOUR A TOOL AND LIAR GET A JOB SONY REP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SONY REP.</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/04/25/80gb-ps3-is-for-real-dare-we-say-in-the-wild/#comment-211246</link>
		<dc:creator>SONY REP.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 02:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/04/25/80gb-ps3-is-for-real-dare-we-say-in-the-wild/#comment-211246</guid>
		<description>Everybody that has seen this, this is a fake, I work for sony and I helped to make the Ps3. And we will not be making this '80gg' Ps3 you all clam, Photoshop people PHOTO SHOP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everybody that has seen this, this is a fake, I work for sony and I helped to make the Ps3. And we will not be making this &#8216;80gg&#8217; Ps3 you all clam, Photoshop people PHOTO SHOP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul G</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/04/25/80gb-ps3-is-for-real-dare-we-say-in-the-wild/#comment-203124</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/04/25/80gb-ps3-is-for-real-dare-we-say-in-the-wild/#comment-203124</guid>
		<description>Actually the truth behind this is that we've run out of 20GB and 60GB drives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually the truth behind this is that we&#8217;ve run out of 20GB and 60GB drives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/04/25/80gb-ps3-is-for-real-dare-we-say-in-the-wild/#comment-202959</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/04/25/80gb-ps3-is-for-real-dare-we-say-in-the-wild/#comment-202959</guid>
		<description>Going from 60 to 80 is not that big a deal. An extra 20GB means you could store an additional 4 movies at high quality, or about 2 hours of HD content. Meh. I want a 500 GB drive for the PS3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Going from 60 to 80 is not that big a deal. An extra 20GB means you could store an additional 4 movies at high quality, or about 2 hours of HD content. Meh. I want a 500 GB drive for the PS3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/04/25/80gb-ps3-is-for-real-dare-we-say-in-the-wild/#comment-202893</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/04/25/80gb-ps3-is-for-real-dare-we-say-in-the-wild/#comment-202893</guid>
		<description>Will these play Bubble Bobble?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will these play Bubble Bobble?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Artega</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/04/25/80gb-ps3-is-for-real-dare-we-say-in-the-wild/#comment-202855</link>
		<dc:creator>Artega</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/04/25/80gb-ps3-is-for-real-dare-we-say-in-the-wild/#comment-202855</guid>
		<description>Could it be that Sony just pulled out all the 20Gb hard drive and stuck them to the 60Gb version and call it an upgrade?

...with Elite having 120Gb of storage why would Sony only up the hard drive to 80.

I don't own a next gen console (just my wii)
but why do we need a big harddrive if we can't(shouldn't) download HD movies/game?

80Gb just for contents downloadable from live market or sony store?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could it be that Sony just pulled out all the 20Gb hard drive and stuck them to the 60Gb version and call it an upgrade?</p>
<p>&#8230;with Elite having 120Gb of storage why would Sony only up the hard drive to 80.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t own a next gen console (just my wii)<br />
but why do we need a big harddrive if we can&#8217;t(shouldn&#8217;t) download HD movies/game?</p>
<p>80Gb just for contents downloadable from live market or sony store?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Double Dizzle</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/04/25/80gb-ps3-is-for-real-dare-we-say-in-the-wild/#comment-202813</link>
		<dc:creator>Double Dizzle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/04/25/80gb-ps3-is-for-real-dare-we-say-in-the-wild/#comment-202813</guid>
		<description>Just throw a 80GB (or more) into your current 60GB model and call it a day.  I also don't see how the new Xbox 360 model provides solid proof for this article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just throw a 80GB (or more) into your current 60GB model and call it a day.  I also don&#8217;t see how the new Xbox 360 model provides solid proof for this article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kman</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/04/25/80gb-ps3-is-for-real-dare-we-say-in-the-wild/#comment-202793</link>
		<dc:creator>Kman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/04/25/80gb-ps3-is-for-real-dare-we-say-in-the-wild/#comment-202793</guid>
		<description>The 80GB will be replacing the 60GB at the same price point or less.  Sony already said last year that their would be incremental improvements like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 80GB will be replacing the 60GB at the same price point or less.  Sony already said last year that their would be incremental improvements like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/04/25/80gb-ps3-is-for-real-dare-we-say-in-the-wild/#comment-202729</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/04/25/80gb-ps3-is-for-real-dare-we-say-in-the-wild/#comment-202729</guid>
		<description>Those sneaky sneaky bastards...

Anyway, I don't know what they're thinking of by making a 'better' version of the 60gb ps3 which was currently the 'better' version. So a 'better' version of the 'better' version would only make the new 'better' version more expensive...throwing it's 'better'-ness out the window, seeing as how that's why the current 'better' ps3 hasn't been selling. 

The only way I can see this sell is by a price drop all around...And boy can we only hope.

(plus I'd like to see the 80gb have more than just the hdd, anyone can get the 60gb version and replace the hard drive, they DID make it easy enough for you to do so.  So if the only thing different is the hdd, then it's not worth it...especially if it's over the current $600 price tag)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those sneaky sneaky bastards&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyway, I don&#8217;t know what they&#8217;re thinking of by making a &#8216;better&#8217; version of the 60gb ps3 which was currently the &#8216;better&#8217; version. So a &#8216;better&#8217; version of the &#8216;better&#8217; version would only make the new &#8216;better&#8217; version more expensive&#8230;throwing it&#8217;s &#8216;better&#8217;-ness out the window, seeing as how that&#8217;s why the current &#8216;better&#8217; ps3 hasn&#8217;t been selling. </p>
<p>The only way I can see this sell is by a price drop all around&#8230;And boy can we only hope.</p>
<p>(plus I&#8217;d like to see the 80gb have more than just the hdd, anyone can get the 60gb version and replace the hard drive, they DID make it easy enough for you to do so.  So if the only thing different is the hdd, then it&#8217;s not worth it&#8230;especially if it&#8217;s over the current $600 price tag)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.099 seconds -->
