<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Feature: Ten Lamest Fake Movie Gadgets Ever</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/04/27/feature-ten-lamest-fake-movie-gadgets-ever/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/04/27/feature-ten-lamest-fake-movie-gadgets-ever/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 09:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/04/27/feature-ten-lamest-fake-movie-gadgets-ever/#comment-594013</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 03:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/04/27/feature-ten-lamest-fake-movie-gadgets-ever/#comment-594013</guid>
		<description>Ha, I have another observation of the Star Trek doors. Most of the time someone walks up to the door and just as they get there the door opens.  But sometimes, just as they get to the door and it normally would have opened, someone from off camera says 'excuse me Captain', so the captain turns around.....and the door never opens. Even though he is standing RIGHT in front of it. When the conversation is over the door opens very conveniently.

But i won't lie to you when I say as a kid growing up we pretended our sliding closet doors were star trek doors, we even made the noises PSHHHHHHHT.

As far as useless gadgets, I would have to say R2-D2. Think about it, every thing he did could have been incorporated into Threepio. The computer plugins, the scanners, all could have been Threepio. R2 was pretty much useless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha, I have another observation of the Star Trek doors. Most of the time someone walks up to the door and just as they get there the door opens.  But sometimes, just as they get to the door and it normally would have opened, someone from off camera says &#8216;excuse me Captain&#8217;, so the captain turns around&#8230;..and the door never opens. Even though he is standing RIGHT in front of it. When the conversation is over the door opens very conveniently.</p>
<p>But i won&#8217;t lie to you when I say as a kid growing up we pretended our sliding closet doors were star trek doors, we even made the noises PSHHHHHHHT.</p>
<p>As far as useless gadgets, I would have to say R2-D2. Think about it, every thing he did could have been incorporated into Threepio. The computer plugins, the scanners, all could have been Threepio. R2 was pretty much useless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wt</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/04/27/feature-ten-lamest-fake-movie-gadgets-ever/#comment-210358</link>
		<dc:creator>wt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 02:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/04/27/feature-ten-lamest-fake-movie-gadgets-ever/#comment-210358</guid>
		<description>The X-Ray glasses are not from Goldeneye, they are from The World is Not Enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The X-Ray glasses are not from Goldeneye, they are from The World is Not Enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orga</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/04/27/feature-ten-lamest-fake-movie-gadgets-ever/#comment-209147</link>
		<dc:creator>Orga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/04/27/feature-ten-lamest-fake-movie-gadgets-ever/#comment-209147</guid>
		<description>Well, the anything that happened after Aliens never existed, as far as I'm concerned. So I really don't care how they try to explain her presence in that abortion masquerading as a movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the anything that happened after Aliens never existed, as far as I&#8217;m concerned. So I really don&#8217;t care how they try to explain her presence in that abortion masquerading as a movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lucabrazi</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/04/27/feature-ten-lamest-fake-movie-gadgets-ever/#comment-208272</link>
		<dc:creator>lucabrazi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 21:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/04/27/feature-ten-lamest-fake-movie-gadgets-ever/#comment-208272</guid>
		<description>OK, how about the whole Ripley clone thing in the fourth Alien movie.  They might as well have blamed magic fairies for Sigorney Weaver's presence--it's just as biologically possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, how about the whole Ripley clone thing in the fourth Alien movie.  They might as well have blamed magic fairies for Sigorney Weaver&#8217;s presence&#8211;it&#8217;s just as biologically possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ilya</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/04/27/feature-ten-lamest-fake-movie-gadgets-ever/#comment-208248</link>
		<dc:creator>ilya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 20:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/04/27/feature-ten-lamest-fake-movie-gadgets-ever/#comment-208248</guid>
		<description>I do believe that based on the Websters dictionary of English and all standard grammatical rules in every human language state that the words "hover" "lame" and "fake" cannot be used in the same sentence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do believe that based on the Websters dictionary of English and all standard grammatical rules in every human language state that the words &#8220;hover&#8221; &#8220;lame&#8221; and &#8220;fake&#8221; cannot be used in the same sentence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/04/27/feature-ten-lamest-fake-movie-gadgets-ever/#comment-207972</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 14:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/04/27/feature-ten-lamest-fake-movie-gadgets-ever/#comment-207972</guid>
		<description>&#62; Because it doesn’t come in contact with the physical surfaces it “skates” over, you lose the ability to do all the crazy tricks skaters are known for [...]

Bollocks; so you're grinding over the rail instead of on it--big whup. You'd still be able to do almost every single trick, and at speeds more likely to cause grievous physical injury: win-win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Because it doesn’t come in contact with the physical surfaces it “skates” over, you lose the ability to do all the crazy tricks skaters are known for [...]</p>
<p>Bollocks; so you&#8217;re grinding over the rail instead of on it&#8211;big whup. You&#8217;d still be able to do almost every single trick, and at speeds more likely to cause grievous physical injury: win-win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bkev</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/04/27/feature-ten-lamest-fake-movie-gadgets-ever/#comment-207435</link>
		<dc:creator>bkev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 05:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/04/27/feature-ten-lamest-fake-movie-gadgets-ever/#comment-207435</guid>
		<description>Lame as the movie was, the new KITT (aka the Knight 4000) in Knight Rider 2000 was emphatically NOT a Pontiac Banshee, though it certainly stole its styling cues from it. The donor car was a 1991 Dodge Stealth...see it here   I wish I didn't know that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lame as the movie was, the new KITT (aka the Knight 4000) in Knight Rider 2000 was emphatically NOT a Pontiac Banshee, though it certainly stole its styling cues from it. The donor car was a 1991 Dodge Stealth&#8230;see it here   I wish I didn&#8217;t know that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/04/27/feature-ten-lamest-fake-movie-gadgets-ever/#comment-206875</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 18:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/04/27/feature-ten-lamest-fake-movie-gadgets-ever/#comment-206875</guid>
		<description>There are a few Star Trek things I never really understood:

&#62; Communicators.  If Capt. Picard says, for example, "Picard to Worf," only Worf hears it.  How does the communicator know to only route the audio to Worf's comm?  All he does is tap his comm badge thing, says "Picard to x," and only x hears it.  I guess I could presume the comms are smart enough to understand the name that is spoken, and would then route the audio only to the comm assigned to that individual, but that would require at least a slight delay...  And if I'm not mistaken, haven't there been occasions when X was speaking to Y, and in mid-conversation, X or Y asks Z if he heard what was being said?  And if Z is able to hear what X &#38; Y said--without being included in the initial prompt, wouldn't that presume that everyone can hear it?  If so, wouldn't we frequently hear chatter between individuals not on-camera?  

&#62; Phasers.  Phasers set to "stun" will start a fire, or burn a hole in a substance, or cut through metal, etc., but the same setting will merely incapacitate a biological being.  Bullshit.

&#62; Those auto-opening doors.  If you walk up to it (and it's not locked), the door will open.  After you walk though it, sometimes it closes immediately after you've passed the threshold, and sometimes it "knows" to stay open when a person on the other side of the opening is speaking to you as you're walking away.  And what about the fact that a locked door opens automatically when you say "Come," or "Come in," or "Enter," etc., but if you don't want the door to open but you want to say something to the person outside, speaking those words in your sentence doesn't open the door.  

I won't even get into the cool-but-inconsistent-and-impossible universal translators...  

On a side note, did anyone else ever wonder why the audio quality of the communications systems on Battlestar Gallactica sounds so horrible--worse than the audio quality of present-day communications devices?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a few Star Trek things I never really understood:</p>
<p>&gt; Communicators.  If Capt. Picard says, for example, &#8220;Picard to Worf,&#8221; only Worf hears it.  How does the communicator know to only route the audio to Worf&#8217;s comm?  All he does is tap his comm badge thing, says &#8220;Picard to x,&#8221; and only x hears it.  I guess I could presume the comms are smart enough to understand the name that is spoken, and would then route the audio only to the comm assigned to that individual, but that would require at least a slight delay&#8230;  And if I&#8217;m not mistaken, haven&#8217;t there been occasions when X was speaking to Y, and in mid-conversation, X or Y asks Z if he heard what was being said?  And if Z is able to hear what X &amp; Y said&#8211;without being included in the initial prompt, wouldn&#8217;t that presume that everyone can hear it?  If so, wouldn&#8217;t we frequently hear chatter between individuals not on-camera?  </p>
<p>&gt; Phasers.  Phasers set to &#8220;stun&#8221; will start a fire, or burn a hole in a substance, or cut through metal, etc., but the same setting will merely incapacitate a biological being.  Bullshit.</p>
<p>&gt; Those auto-opening doors.  If you walk up to it (and it&#8217;s not locked), the door will open.  After you walk though it, sometimes it closes immediately after you&#8217;ve passed the threshold, and sometimes it &#8220;knows&#8221; to stay open when a person on the other side of the opening is speaking to you as you&#8217;re walking away.  And what about the fact that a locked door opens automatically when you say &#8220;Come,&#8221; or &#8220;Come in,&#8221; or &#8220;Enter,&#8221; etc., but if you don&#8217;t want the door to open but you want to say something to the person outside, speaking those words in your sentence doesn&#8217;t open the door.  </p>
<p>I won&#8217;t even get into the cool-but-inconsistent-and-impossible universal translators&#8230;  </p>
<p>On a side note, did anyone else ever wonder why the audio quality of the communications systems on Battlestar Gallactica sounds so horrible&#8211;worse than the audio quality of present-day communications devices?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/04/27/feature-ten-lamest-fake-movie-gadgets-ever/#comment-206754</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/04/27/feature-ten-lamest-fake-movie-gadgets-ever/#comment-206754</guid>
		<description>The "lame" 'stealth' boat is a real boat: http://www.fresh99.com/james-bond-boat.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;lame&#8221; &#8217;stealth&#8217; boat is a real boat: <a href="http://www.fresh99.com/james-bond-boat.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.fresh99.com/james-bond-boat.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avatar</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/04/27/feature-ten-lamest-fake-movie-gadgets-ever/#comment-206242</link>
		<dc:creator>Avatar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 07:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/04/27/feature-ten-lamest-fake-movie-gadgets-ever/#comment-206242</guid>
		<description>The hoverboard?... you have really lost it... the tricks are aerial, they were never shown, marty used it as a skateboard since it was what he knows from the past but we are never shown how you do tricks in them do we?..

And he didn´t even used a proper hoverboard if you recall griff ad the gang hoverboards, it was little girls hoverboard BASE if you remember correctly..barbie branded no less..

And yes ilya, the hoverboard is crucial to BTF II and even III...  it seems that Matt don`t remembers the movies at all..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The hoverboard?&#8230; you have really lost it&#8230; the tricks are aerial, they were never shown, marty used it as a skateboard since it was what he knows from the past but we are never shown how you do tricks in them do we?..</p>
<p>And he didn´t even used a proper hoverboard if you recall griff ad the gang hoverboards, it was little girls hoverboard BASE if you remember correctly..barbie branded no less..</p>
<p>And yes ilya, the hoverboard is crucial to BTF II and even III&#8230;  it seems that Matt don`t remembers the movies at all..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/04/27/feature-ten-lamest-fake-movie-gadgets-ever/#comment-205998</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 04:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/04/27/feature-ten-lamest-fake-movie-gadgets-ever/#comment-205998</guid>
		<description>I gotta agree with Real Genius being.. err.. Real Genius.

"It's a penis extender.  Wanna try?"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gotta agree with Real Genius being.. err.. Real Genius.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s a penis extender.  Wanna try?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ilya</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/04/27/feature-ten-lamest-fake-movie-gadgets-ever/#comment-205676</link>
		<dc:creator>ilya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/04/27/feature-ten-lamest-fake-movie-gadgets-ever/#comment-205676</guid>
		<description>Also, I haven't seen Back to the Future in a few years... Wasn't the hover board pretty crucial to the plot?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, I haven&#8217;t seen Back to the Future in a few years&#8230; Wasn&#8217;t the hover board pretty crucial to the plot?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Callie</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/04/27/feature-ten-lamest-fake-movie-gadgets-ever/#comment-205671</link>
		<dc:creator>Callie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/04/27/feature-ten-lamest-fake-movie-gadgets-ever/#comment-205671</guid>
		<description>Seriouly, Matt.  I was with you all the way until you dissed Real Genius.  Come ON.  A laser that shoots a hole the size of a fist in everything in  it's path for miles?  How is that NOT a fantastic idea?  Totally useful, totally safe.  

Really though, I'm mad you felt the need to bring Real Genius into this.  We will have words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriouly, Matt.  I was with you all the way until you dissed Real Genius.  Come ON.  A laser that shoots a hole the size of a fist in everything in  it&#8217;s path for miles?  How is that NOT a fantastic idea?  Totally useful, totally safe.  </p>
<p>Really though, I&#8217;m mad you felt the need to bring Real Genius into this.  We will have words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ilya</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/04/27/feature-ten-lamest-fake-movie-gadgets-ever/#comment-205670</link>
		<dc:creator>ilya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/04/27/feature-ten-lamest-fake-movie-gadgets-ever/#comment-205670</guid>
		<description>I am pretty sure you have never seen "Agent Cody Banks" ... Your list would have been quite a bit longer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am pretty sure you have never seen &#8220;Agent Cody Banks&#8221; &#8230; Your list would have been quite a bit longer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.197 seconds -->
