<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New MP3 Players On The Way From Creative</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/05/02/new-mp3-players-on-the-way-from-creative/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/05/02/new-mp3-players-on-the-way-from-creative/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 08:03:43 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/05/02/new-mp3-players-on-the-way-from-creative/comment-page-1/#comment-210778</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 14:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/05/02/new-mp3-players-on-the-way-from-creative/#comment-210778</guid>
		<description>Of course Creative is coming up with new stuff - just about any and every company is coming up with new stuff... so this article is nothing but marketing fluff... they didn&#039;t even have to interview anybody to say such &quot;bold&quot; statements. So why did Network World publish an article that is essentially about NOTHING? Now, that I would like to know.

Jon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course Creative is coming up with new stuff &#8211; just about any and every company is coming up with new stuff&#8230; so this article is nothing but marketing fluff&#8230; they didn&#8217;t even have to interview anybody to say such &#8220;bold&#8221; statements. So why did Network World publish an article that is essentially about NOTHING? Now, that I would like to know.</p>
<p>Jon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
