<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Halo 2 vs. Halo 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/05/17/halo-2-vs-halo-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/05/17/halo-2-vs-halo-3/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:29:32 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/05/17/halo-2-vs-halo-3/comment-page-1/#comment-242997</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 18:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/05/17/halo-2-vs-halo-3/#comment-242997</guid>
		<description>too me it looks like it&#039;s running on the same engine just in a higher res.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>too me it looks like it&#8217;s running on the same engine just in a higher res.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dusty</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/05/17/halo-2-vs-halo-3/comment-page-1/#comment-226359</link>
		<dc:creator>dusty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 17:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/05/17/halo-2-vs-halo-3/#comment-226359</guid>
		<description>Thegraphics in halo 3 are so cool</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thegraphics in halo 3 are so cool</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/05/17/halo-2-vs-halo-3/comment-page-1/#comment-225339</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 18:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/05/17/halo-2-vs-halo-3/#comment-225339</guid>
		<description>It actually looks pretty good with a side by side comparison. But I agree that it could still be better..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It actually looks pretty good with a side by side comparison. But I agree that it could still be better..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cosmic</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/05/17/halo-2-vs-halo-3/comment-page-1/#comment-225336</link>
		<dc:creator>Cosmic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 18:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/05/17/halo-2-vs-halo-3/#comment-225336</guid>
		<description>IIRC, the graphics - or at least, the actual appearance of the game, not the engine itself - took a step up between H2 beta and the full release.  Honestly, I don&#039;t know the details of how that works, but I remember being underwhelmed by the look of the beta and pleasantly surprised by the improvement in the actual game.  I would expect the same to happen this time around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IIRC, the graphics &#8211; or at least, the actual appearance of the game, not the engine itself &#8211; took a step up between H2 beta and the full release.  Honestly, I don&#8217;t know the details of how that works, but I remember being underwhelmed by the look of the beta and pleasantly surprised by the improvement in the actual game.  I would expect the same to happen this time around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ev</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/05/17/halo-2-vs-halo-3/comment-page-1/#comment-225323</link>
		<dc:creator>Ev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 17:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/05/17/halo-2-vs-halo-3/#comment-225323</guid>
		<description>while i like the h3 beta, i still think the graphics need a step up, GOW is better looking IMO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>while i like the h3 beta, i still think the graphics need a step up, GOW is better looking IMO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
