<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;My Router Got Hacked!&#8221; Excuse Wearing Thin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/05/29/my-router-got-hacked-excuse-wearing-thin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/05/29/my-router-got-hacked-excuse-wearing-thin/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:28:18 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/05/29/my-router-got-hacked-excuse-wearing-thin/comment-page-1/#comment-570918</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 13:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/05/29/my-router-got-hacked-excuse-wearing-thin/#comment-570918</guid>
		<description>Technically it is true that &quot;there is no presumption of innocence in a civil case&quot; but only because there is no finding of &quot;guilt&quot; in a civil case! The burden of proof still lies with the plaintiff not the defendant.

By the way, that was in the United Kingdom not the United States so the laws are a bit different there anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technically it is true that &#8220;there is no presumption of innocence in a civil case&#8221; but only because there is no finding of &#8220;guilt&#8221; in a civil case! The burden of proof still lies with the plaintiff not the defendant.</p>
<p>By the way, that was in the United Kingdom not the United States so the laws are a bit different there anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/05/29/my-router-got-hacked-excuse-wearing-thin/comment-page-1/#comment-570916</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 13:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/05/29/my-router-got-hacked-excuse-wearing-thin/#comment-570916</guid>
		<description>You miss the point! If &quot;you did all that you could to secure your network&quot; then you have a weak defense. The idea is you are ignorant of that stuff, as most people are, so you have no idea how somebody got into your internet connection. Let them prove otherwise!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You miss the point! If &#8220;you did all that you could to secure your network&#8221; then you have a weak defense. The idea is you are ignorant of that stuff, as most people are, so you have no idea how somebody got into your internet connection. Let them prove otherwise!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/05/29/my-router-got-hacked-excuse-wearing-thin/comment-page-1/#comment-240416</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 09:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/05/29/my-router-got-hacked-excuse-wearing-thin/#comment-240416</guid>
		<description>Man... Of course this doesn&#039;t change anything. Lawyers bullying people into submission does not make it lawful, good or right on any level.

Did those lawyers read the manuals for their appliances? No. That is not required by law, and probably never will be.

Next to that, why should the defendant provide information to vindicate him or herself?

Guilty until proven innocent = wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man&#8230; Of course this doesn&#8217;t change anything. Lawyers bullying people into submission does not make it lawful, good or right on any level.</p>
<p>Did those lawyers read the manuals for their appliances? No. That is not required by law, and probably never will be.</p>
<p>Next to that, why should the defendant provide information to vindicate him or herself?</p>
<p>Guilty until proven innocent = wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/05/29/my-router-got-hacked-excuse-wearing-thin/comment-page-1/#comment-237817</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 06:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/05/29/my-router-got-hacked-excuse-wearing-thin/#comment-237817</guid>
		<description>There is no presumption of innocence in a civil case.

If you&#039;re going to claim someone broke into your router as a defense, you&#039;re gonna&#039; have to provide evidence it happened.  A jury might believe you - or not.

Otherwise,

Pfft!

Legal boogey-man story.

If you&#039;re going to go up against a bunch of lawyers by yourself, assuming you have no legal training or have graduated from a California law school, than yeah, chances are you&#039;re gonna&#039; get burned.

A better tact , sell your X-Box and give half the money to the lawyer that hangs out at a gin joint all day.  Even he could get you out of this.  Without even leaving his bar stool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no presumption of innocence in a civil case.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re going to claim someone broke into your router as a defense, you&#8217;re gonna&#8217; have to provide evidence it happened.  A jury might believe you &#8211; or not.</p>
<p>Otherwise,</p>
<p>Pfft!</p>
<p>Legal boogey-man story.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re going to go up against a bunch of lawyers by yourself, assuming you have no legal training or have graduated from a California law school, than yeah, chances are you&#8217;re gonna&#8217; get burned.</p>
<p>A better tact , sell your X-Box and give half the money to the lawyer that hangs out at a gin joint all day.  Even he could get you out of this.  Without even leaving his bar stool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/05/29/my-router-got-hacked-excuse-wearing-thin/comment-page-1/#comment-237262</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 18:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/05/29/my-router-got-hacked-excuse-wearing-thin/#comment-237262</guid>
		<description>So by your perspective, and the RIAA&#039;s, it&#039;s &quot;guilty until proven innocent&quot;?
Sieg, dude!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So by your perspective, and the RIAA&#8217;s, it&#8217;s &#8220;guilty until proven innocent&#8221;?<br />
Sieg, dude!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
