<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wildy Wrong Rumors Killed WWDC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/06/11/wildy-wrong-rumors-killed-wwdc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/06/11/wildy-wrong-rumors-killed-wwdc/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 03:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Concerned for your reading ability</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/06/11/wildy-wrong-rumors-killed-wwdc/#comment-253967</link>
		<dc:creator>Concerned for your reading ability</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 00:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/06/11/wildy-wrong-rumors-killed-wwdc/#comment-253967</guid>
		<description>http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2007/06/08/apple_al_imac/

^ This article clearly adopts a very informative tone, which proves two things. One, it takes rumors with caution, disproving your wild, ill-founded assertion that everyone is getting "hot and bothered". Two, the word usage in the article contradicts your assertion. The article makes a clear distinction between facts and claims, phrasing its report in a way that reflects these distinctions. 

http://www.macrumors.com/2007/06/07/brushed-aluminum-imac-at-wwdc/

^ The same holds true for this article. You'll notice that the two articles so far both had question marks in their title, indicating that it's a possibility, not a certainty. No one is taking these rumors for religious texts and betting the farm on them. 

Your broad condemnation is a thin veil for the disappointment you personally hold. If that is the case, then so be it. We would all like to see more and more from Apple, yet that does not necessitate a categorical classification of anyone and everyone who has ever read a rumor about Apple.

Some people have the ability to rationalize. Nay, most do. 

As for you, Nicholas Deleon, you shame yourself, CrunchGear by purporting such nonsensical incoherence, and predicating that jumble on hearsay (i.e. "The general consensus on this year’s WWDC, at least going by the response of a few message boards I’ve cruised and our own professional opinion, is that WWDC stunk.")

I'm not really an Apple fanboy, but based on the banner you yourself have so graciously posted, it would appear that WWDC isn't over... A prematurely posted article? Or just foolishness?

Youthinks whatever you like, but don't blather about it so brazenly. I echo teki's sentiment: "The only thing that have been hurt are the rumors itself [sic]."

Meaning, your article doesn't make any sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2007/06/08/apple_al_imac/" rel="nofollow">http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2007/06/08/apple_al_imac/</a></p>
<p>^ This article clearly adopts a very informative tone, which proves two things. One, it takes rumors with caution, disproving your wild, ill-founded assertion that everyone is getting &#8220;hot and bothered&#8221;. Two, the word usage in the article contradicts your assertion. The article makes a clear distinction between facts and claims, phrasing its report in a way that reflects these distinctions. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2007/06/07/brushed-aluminum-imac-at-wwdc/" rel="nofollow">http://www.macrumors.com/2007/06/07/brushed-aluminum-imac-at-wwdc/</a></p>
<p>^ The same holds true for this article. You&#8217;ll notice that the two articles so far both had question marks in their title, indicating that it&#8217;s a possibility, not a certainty. No one is taking these rumors for religious texts and betting the farm on them. </p>
<p>Your broad condemnation is a thin veil for the disappointment you personally hold. If that is the case, then so be it. We would all like to see more and more from Apple, yet that does not necessitate a categorical classification of anyone and everyone who has ever read a rumor about Apple.</p>
<p>Some people have the ability to rationalize. Nay, most do. </p>
<p>As for you, Nicholas Deleon, you shame yourself, CrunchGear by purporting such nonsensical incoherence, and predicating that jumble on hearsay (i.e. &#8220;The general consensus on this year’s WWDC, at least going by the response of a few message boards I’ve cruised and our own professional opinion, is that WWDC stunk.&#8221;)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not really an Apple fanboy, but based on the banner you yourself have so graciously posted, it would appear that WWDC isn&#8217;t over&#8230; A prematurely posted article? Or just foolishness?</p>
<p>Youthinks whatever you like, but don&#8217;t blather about it so brazenly. I echo teki&#8217;s sentiment: &#8220;The only thing that have been hurt are the rumors itself [sic].&#8221;</p>
<p>Meaning, your article doesn&#8217;t make any sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yoshi</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/06/11/wildy-wrong-rumors-killed-wwdc/#comment-253941</link>
		<dc:creator>yoshi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 23:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/06/11/wildy-wrong-rumors-killed-wwdc/#comment-253941</guid>
		<description>"These rampant and apparently baseless rumors are beginning to hurt Apple’s image, methinks."

Huh?  Even if that statement is partially true who's fault is that?  Those that release the baseless rumors (e.g. crunchgear) or those that believe in them (e.g. crunchgear)?  

For most consumers - these run away rumors don't impact buying decisions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;These rampant and apparently baseless rumors are beginning to hurt Apple’s image, methinks.&#8221;</p>
<p>Huh?  Even if that statement is partially true who&#8217;s fault is that?  Those that release the baseless rumors (e.g. crunchgear) or those that believe in them (e.g. crunchgear)?  </p>
<p>For most consumers - these run away rumors don&#8217;t impact buying decisions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teki321</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/06/11/wildy-wrong-rumors-killed-wwdc/#comment-253937</link>
		<dc:creator>teki321</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 23:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/06/11/wildy-wrong-rumors-killed-wwdc/#comment-253937</guid>
		<description>To release Safari for Windows is a really wise thing. Windows based web developers can check their stuff on Safari too from now, and the iPhone's browser is Safari based too. It really doesn't matter how good is the browser itself.

&#62; These rampant and apparently baseless rumors are beginning 
&#62; to hurt Apple’s image, methinks.

The only thing that have been hurt are the rumors itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To release Safari for Windows is a really wise thing. Windows based web developers can check their stuff on Safari too from now, and the iPhone&#8217;s browser is Safari based too. It really doesn&#8217;t matter how good is the browser itself.</p>
<p>&gt; These rampant and apparently baseless rumors are beginning<br />
&gt; to hurt Apple’s image, methinks.</p>
<p>The only thing that have been hurt are the rumors itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chuck</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/06/11/wildy-wrong-rumors-killed-wwdc/#comment-253852</link>
		<dc:creator>chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 22:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/06/11/wildy-wrong-rumors-killed-wwdc/#comment-253852</guid>
		<description>Safari is cool????  Explain to me why this is, I am using it right now and I don't feel a bit cooler.   How deluded are Apple freaks to proclaim that a Windows Beta of Safari, which to me, seems less functional, buggy and dumbed down as compared to FireFox and IE, as cool.  Puhleeeese, try to stay away from the Kool Aid for a day or two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Safari is cool????  Explain to me why this is, I am using it right now and I don&#8217;t feel a bit cooler.   How deluded are Apple freaks to proclaim that a Windows Beta of Safari, which to me, seems less functional, buggy and dumbed down as compared to FireFox and IE, as cool.  Puhleeeese, try to stay away from the Kool Aid for a day or two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.170 seconds -->
