<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Geek Trends: On Innovation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/07/09/geek-trends-on-innovation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/07/09/geek-trends-on-innovation/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:56:02 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tom needer</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/07/09/geek-trends-on-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-327936</link>
		<dc:creator>tom needer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 23:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/07/09/geek-trends-on-innovation/#comment-327936</guid>
		<description>What about groups like inventgeek.com?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about groups like inventgeek.com?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/07/09/geek-trends-on-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-319002</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 03:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/07/09/geek-trends-on-innovation/#comment-319002</guid>
		<description>Alright, clearly you have an agenda, so I&#039;ll forgive you for taking my quotes out of context and misrepresenting me in both this comment and on your blog. Nevertheless, there is nothing out of sync with my statements about Segways. The vehicle is very clearly banned in a wide-span of areas. Here are just a few news stories supporting that claim:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,209827,00.html
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4217573
http://www.sfweekly.com/2002-12-18/news/showing-segway-the-highway/

Regarding my statement about its safety, I&#039;m willing to admit that that comment was less based in evidence and rooted more in my experience and powers of deduction. For one, it clearly couldn&#039;t withstand any sort of true traffic collision. Secondly, main municipalities have restricted or banned the use of Segways as a result of their dubious safeguards. One such problem is the lack of a true brake. Japan actually requires users have brakes installed if they are to use it on roads. 

That said, I appreciate the fact that you appreciate the Segway, but next time you feel the need to pounce on someone&#039;s statements, please be prepared to back it up with an adequate retort. You supply no evidence to the contrary of my statements and thus are actually guilty of the very grievance that you erroneously and irrationally charged me with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright, clearly you have an agenda, so I&#8217;ll forgive you for taking my quotes out of context and misrepresenting me in both this comment and on your blog. Nevertheless, there is nothing out of sync with my statements about Segways. The vehicle is very clearly banned in a wide-span of areas. Here are just a few news stories supporting that claim:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,209827,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,209827,00.html</a><br />
<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4217573" rel="nofollow">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4217573</a><br />
<a href="http://www.sfweekly.com/2002-12-18/news/showing-segway-the-highway/" rel="nofollow">http://www.sfweekly.com/2002-12-18/news/showing-segway-the-highway/</a></p>
<p>Regarding my statement about its safety, I&#8217;m willing to admit that that comment was less based in evidence and rooted more in my experience and powers of deduction. For one, it clearly couldn&#8217;t withstand any sort of true traffic collision. Secondly, main municipalities have restricted or banned the use of Segways as a result of their dubious safeguards. One such problem is the lack of a true brake. Japan actually requires users have brakes installed if they are to use it on roads. </p>
<p>That said, I appreciate the fact that you appreciate the Segway, but next time you feel the need to pounce on someone&#8217;s statements, please be prepared to back it up with an adequate retort. You supply no evidence to the contrary of my statements and thus are actually guilty of the very grievance that you erroneously and irrationally charged me with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/07/09/geek-trends-on-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-317712</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 06:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/07/09/geek-trends-on-innovation/#comment-317712</guid>
		<description>This article makes some valid points about complacency in today’s companies. Sticking more blades on a razor doesn’t necessarily make it a better razor. But where the author gets it terribly wrong is when he slaps the Segway PT on the pile of useless inventions. Segway Inc. is a company that’s offering a truly innovative product. And frankly, it’s articles like these, filled with inaccuracies (“its use has been widely restricted. It’s not really safe for streets, it’s banned on most sidewalks...”) that propagate the old stereotypes and make it difficult for the Segway PT to gain widespread acceptance. Check your facts, Blake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article makes some valid points about complacency in today’s companies. Sticking more blades on a razor doesn’t necessarily make it a better razor. But where the author gets it terribly wrong is when he slaps the Segway PT on the pile of useless inventions. Segway Inc. is a company that’s offering a truly innovative product. And frankly, it’s articles like these, filled with inaccuracies (“its use has been widely restricted. It’s not really safe for streets, it’s banned on most sidewalks&#8230;”) that propagate the old stereotypes and make it difficult for the Segway PT to gain widespread acceptance. Check your facts, Blake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/07/09/geek-trends-on-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-316916</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/07/09/geek-trends-on-innovation/#comment-316916</guid>
		<description>Being the geeks we are, we hang on every incremental change that happens,...ooooo the new iPod is black, oooo&quot;... rather than stand back an look at the big picture.  We are a bit spoiled in thinking that the next big thing is only a day away.

In our past long gone innovations came slowly and the time between major inventions was 100&#039;s if not thousands of years.   

Fire.
The Wheel
The printing  press
The iPhone

What I find really entertaining, on nights when I am really bored, is to watch a movie from not too very long ago, say the 60&#039;s or 70&#039;s, hell maybe the 80&#039;s and see what missing from the picture.  No PC&#039;s, no email&#039;s, no IM, no internet,  no cell&#039;s, crappy TV&#039;s, crappy cars (with notable exceptions), no microwave popcorn ( this is arguably a step in the wrong direction) no portable audio.  

Ever try creating a nice letter on a typewriter... before liquid paper.  Every use an early computer with a 9 pin dot matrix printer?  

If your crappy 70&#039;s car broke down in the middle of nowhere in 1975, you could die and nobody would find the body for months.  Now, unless you are an ATT customer, help is just a cell phone call away.

I once used a quote when responding to a article on iPhones, &quot;Oh the humanity&quot;.  Originally spoken by a radio reporter witnessing the Hindenburg disaster.  Afterwards I thought, what would that reporter have thought back then if he knew some dude in the 21st century would quote him, using something called a computer, over something called the internet, into something called a web page, about some gadget that could wirelessly act like a telephone, play color silent and talkie motion pictures on a small viewing screen made of something called LCD and could hold more &quot;records&quot; than anyone could possibly own.  The poor guy would be staggered and overwhelmed.

But for all of our advances are we any better off.   Yes, I think the chicks now are much hotter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being the geeks we are, we hang on every incremental change that happens,&#8230;ooooo the new iPod is black, oooo&#8221;&#8230; rather than stand back an look at the big picture.  We are a bit spoiled in thinking that the next big thing is only a day away.</p>
<p>In our past long gone innovations came slowly and the time between major inventions was 100&#8217;s if not thousands of years.   </p>
<p>Fire.<br />
The Wheel<br />
The printing  press<br />
The iPhone</p>
<p>What I find really entertaining, on nights when I am really bored, is to watch a movie from not too very long ago, say the 60&#8217;s or 70&#8217;s, hell maybe the 80&#8217;s and see what missing from the picture.  No PC&#8217;s, no email&#8217;s, no IM, no internet,  no cell&#8217;s, crappy TV&#8217;s, crappy cars (with notable exceptions), no microwave popcorn ( this is arguably a step in the wrong direction) no portable audio.  </p>
<p>Ever try creating a nice letter on a typewriter&#8230; before liquid paper.  Every use an early computer with a 9 pin dot matrix printer?  </p>
<p>If your crappy 70&#8217;s car broke down in the middle of nowhere in 1975, you could die and nobody would find the body for months.  Now, unless you are an ATT customer, help is just a cell phone call away.</p>
<p>I once used a quote when responding to a article on iPhones, &#8220;Oh the humanity&#8221;.  Originally spoken by a radio reporter witnessing the Hindenburg disaster.  Afterwards I thought, what would that reporter have thought back then if he knew some dude in the 21st century would quote him, using something called a computer, over something called the internet, into something called a web page, about some gadget that could wirelessly act like a telephone, play color silent and talkie motion pictures on a small viewing screen made of something called LCD and could hold more &#8220;records&#8221; than anyone could possibly own.  The poor guy would be staggered and overwhelmed.</p>
<p>But for all of our advances are we any better off.   Yes, I think the chicks now are much hotter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Augie</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/07/09/geek-trends-on-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-316695</link>
		<dc:creator>Augie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 14:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/07/09/geek-trends-on-innovation/#comment-316695</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s easy to overlook the benefits of new digital gear, especially when the manufacturer promises the world and the product falls short of the advertised goal.  And sure, some of the &quot;upgrades&quot; are nothing more than weak attempts to build buzz and get people to upgrade from one product to the next.

That said, I disagree with you that the &quot;state of electronics is bad.&quot;  I loved my Treo and now love my recently-purchased Sprint Mogul.  (The upgraded speed, greater Outlook server connectivity, and wi-fi capabilities were much more than window dressing in my consideration to get a new smart phone).  I could live without my DVR or MP3 player, but I&#039;d prefer not to!  And in terms of pure improvement of life, I could not recommend more highly the Sennheiser PXC300 noise-cancelling headphones, particularly for anyone who travels.

Point is, one can always focus on how Segway didn&#039;t change the world or the latest cell phone doesn&#039;t whiten your teeth, but that misses the point.  If you don&#039;t want the latest gear, don&#039;t get it.  If your PDA/phone/MP3 Player/toy is annoying you, turn it off!  We all have the free will to use or not use whatever tools become available, so why complain that we have the choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s easy to overlook the benefits of new digital gear, especially when the manufacturer promises the world and the product falls short of the advertised goal.  And sure, some of the &#8220;upgrades&#8221; are nothing more than weak attempts to build buzz and get people to upgrade from one product to the next.</p>
<p>That said, I disagree with you that the &#8220;state of electronics is bad.&#8221;  I loved my Treo and now love my recently-purchased Sprint Mogul.  (The upgraded speed, greater Outlook server connectivity, and wi-fi capabilities were much more than window dressing in my consideration to get a new smart phone).  I could live without my DVR or MP3 player, but I&#8217;d prefer not to!  And in terms of pure improvement of life, I could not recommend more highly the Sennheiser PXC300 noise-cancelling headphones, particularly for anyone who travels.</p>
<p>Point is, one can always focus on how Segway didn&#8217;t change the world or the latest cell phone doesn&#8217;t whiten your teeth, but that misses the point.  If you don&#8217;t want the latest gear, don&#8217;t get it.  If your PDA/phone/MP3 Player/toy is annoying you, turn it off!  We all have the free will to use or not use whatever tools become available, so why complain that we have the choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IgotmyIpod4free</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/07/09/geek-trends-on-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-316082</link>
		<dc:creator>IgotmyIpod4free</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 03:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/07/09/geek-trends-on-innovation/#comment-316082</guid>
		<description>Ah! The American way of taking a baby for a stroll in the park.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah! The American way of taking a baby for a stroll in the park.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/07/09/geek-trends-on-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-315955</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 00:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/07/09/geek-trends-on-innovation/#comment-315955</guid>
		<description>AMEN BROTHA.  While I do feel as though most of the features on a smart phone I use on a fairly regular basis, most of the population does not.  What really makes me laugh is those people who walk around with their bluetooth headsets on all the time in case they get that really important phone call!  &quot;Hey Rico, the ship just arrived&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AMEN BROTHA.  While I do feel as though most of the features on a smart phone I use on a fairly regular basis, most of the population does not.  What really makes me laugh is those people who walk around with their bluetooth headsets on all the time in case they get that really important phone call!  &#8220;Hey Rico, the ship just arrived&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
