Comments on: RIAA Must Pay $68,685.23 After Losing to a Nice Mom

By: Rico

Rico — Thu, 15 Nov 2007 23:38:54 +0000

Sure enough, those whom have lots of money, power and control, (in this case, RIAA), have gone up against an independent, free-spirited mind.

I hope “Mom” lives long enough to actually collect! These cheap corporate dingbats have a real problem with not paying in a timely manner, and instead keeping the matter in the courts for years with appeals, etc.

RIAA bites.

By: Chuck

Chuck — Tue, 17 Jul 2007 23:18:24 +0000

If the RIAA doesn’t appoligize then maybe mom should rip a copy of Brenda Lees “I’m sorry” from Bit Torrent

By: Inetgate

Inetgate — Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:50:16 +0000

It’s a good news.

BTW, did RIAA apology them?

By: Chuck

Chuck — Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:32:22 +0000

“……The RIAA appealed, failed, and now has to pay legal fees to Debbie and her daughter……….” seems like the daughter won also.

Don’t mess with Mom.

By: uh...

uh... — Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:42:19 +0000

But what about the daughter’s case? Did she still lose?

By: John

John — Tue, 17 Jul 2007 09:30:37 +0000

This is music to my eyes! The RIAA should focus on selling music directly to consumers at a fair price (in other words, forget about $20 CDs, consumers have had enough gouging for a lifetime). Also, they should try to lure people away from video games, the gaming industry has done far more harm than “evil downloaders”. And fighting downloaders is passé…now there are many companies out there that allow people to exchange large files with each other with encryption, freely and easily, thereby hiding the contents of transfers. GigaTribe is a lovely example: http://www.gigatribe.com