<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Vista SP1 Until 2009?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/07/24/no-vista-sp1-until-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/07/24/no-vista-sp1-until-2009/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 20:58:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Small Biz Tech Talk Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/07/24/no-vista-sp1-until-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-785635</link>
		<dc:creator>Small Biz Tech Talk Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/07/24/no-vista-sp1-until-2009/#comment-785635</guid>
		<description>I think actually, despite the seemingly long wait, this could be a good sign.  If there was one thing Microsoft should&#039;ve learned from Vista disasters, it was, &quot;TEST&quot; before release, and I think the longer amount of time between product releases could mean they are following this lesson and taking a little more time to make sure everything works before bringing it to users.  I&#039;ve heard some good things about improvements on the new Vista, and let&#039;s hope they turn out to be everything that&#039;s expected ... and a lot more than Vista delivered initially.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think actually, despite the seemingly long wait, this could be a good sign.  If there was one thing Microsoft should&#8217;ve learned from Vista disasters, it was, &#8220;TEST&#8221; before release, and I think the longer amount of time between product releases could mean they are following this lesson and taking a little more time to make sure everything works before bringing it to users.  I&#8217;ve heard some good things about improvements on the new Vista, and let&#8217;s hope they turn out to be everything that&#8217;s expected &#8230; and a lot more than Vista delivered initially.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/07/24/no-vista-sp1-until-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-335557</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 01:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/07/24/no-vista-sp1-until-2009/#comment-335557</guid>
		<description>Every day I question my use of Vista.  I feel some kind of inertia building, slowly tempting me to go back to XP.  One evening it might be Battlefield 2142 repeatedly crashing, another day it might be some random small file copy operation crashing explorer.  The one finger in my dyke (so to speak), holding back the XP waters, is the thought of an impending service pack to make things all better.

Here&#039;s the deal: if this rumour is confirmed, I&#039;m going back to XP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every day I question my use of Vista.  I feel some kind of inertia building, slowly tempting me to go back to XP.  One evening it might be Battlefield 2142 repeatedly crashing, another day it might be some random small file copy operation crashing explorer.  The one finger in my dyke (so to speak), holding back the XP waters, is the thought of an impending service pack to make things all better.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the deal: if this rumour is confirmed, I&#8217;m going back to XP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
