<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PatentMonkey: Patent Reform More than Just in the Air</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/07/24/patentmonkey-patent-reform-more-than-just-in-the-air/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/07/24/patentmonkey-patent-reform-more-than-just-in-the-air/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 04:29:34 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael R. Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/07/24/patentmonkey-patent-reform-more-than-just-in-the-air/comment-page-1/#comment-969222</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael R. Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/07/24/patentmonkey-patent-reform-more-than-just-in-the-air/#comment-969222</guid>
		<description>Please see the proposals for reformation of the patent reform act of 2007/2008/2009 and discover the amazing true history of invention conception since 1790.

www.worldsonlyinventorofsignificancearguably.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please see the proposals for reformation of the patent reform act of 2007/2008/2009 and discover the amazing true history of invention conception since 1790.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.worldsonlyinventorofsignificancearguably.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.worldsonlyinventorofsignificancearguably.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dinnerbell</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/07/24/patentmonkey-patent-reform-more-than-just-in-the-air/comment-page-1/#comment-861361</link>
		<dc:creator>dinnerbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/07/24/patentmonkey-patent-reform-more-than-just-in-the-air/#comment-861361</guid>
		<description>please see http://www.piausa.org/ for a different/opposing view on patent reform</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>please see <a href="http://www.piausa.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.piausa.org/</a> for a different/opposing view on patent reform</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael r. thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/07/24/patentmonkey-patent-reform-more-than-just-in-the-air/comment-page-1/#comment-417638</link>
		<dc:creator>michael r. thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 22:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/07/24/patentmonkey-patent-reform-more-than-just-in-the-air/#comment-417638</guid>
		<description>Whats missing from 2007 reform act. It does nothing to establish inventor security when dealing with billion dollar ideas why would security not be the first concern in establishing a integretious patent system. Patents are stolen then corruptly horse traded. The system has never recognized the theory of master inventor creating all major invention or even considered or investigated.This has allowed the thefts of all or nearly all intellectual materials that have been applied for since 1790. Another factor is that pataent review boards are controlled by inventors who certantly would not be impartial to the master inventor who they stole intellectual materials from. another problem with first to file changes is the theftors will simply change tactics to accusing intellectual material thefts when the master inventor files first. Post deadline filing days must accompany first to file in order to establish integrity. this way if they are unable to identify the invention stolen they cannot claim this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whats missing from 2007 reform act. It does nothing to establish inventor security when dealing with billion dollar ideas why would security not be the first concern in establishing a integretious patent system. Patents are stolen then corruptly horse traded. The system has never recognized the theory of master inventor creating all major invention or even considered or investigated.This has allowed the thefts of all or nearly all intellectual materials that have been applied for since 1790. Another factor is that pataent review boards are controlled by inventors who certantly would not be impartial to the master inventor who they stole intellectual materials from. another problem with first to file changes is the theftors will simply change tactics to accusing intellectual material thefts when the master inventor files first. Post deadline filing days must accompany first to file in order to establish integrity. this way if they are unable to identify the invention stolen they cannot claim this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael r. thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/07/24/patentmonkey-patent-reform-more-than-just-in-the-air/comment-page-1/#comment-364289</link>
		<dc:creator>michael r. thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 20:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/07/24/patentmonkey-patent-reform-more-than-just-in-the-air/#comment-364289</guid>
		<description>Applicant Quality submission Act Talk about a fraud attempt. Before filing you must complete a complete study of revelant prior art. This will allow any one who wants to steal your patentable idea to see what it is by computer hacking and connecting the dots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Applicant Quality submission Act Talk about a fraud attempt. Before filing you must complete a complete study of revelant prior art. This will allow any one who wants to steal your patentable idea to see what it is by computer hacking and connecting the dots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael r. thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/07/24/patentmonkey-patent-reform-more-than-just-in-the-air/comment-page-1/#comment-364224</link>
		<dc:creator>michael r. thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 19:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/07/24/patentmonkey-patent-reform-more-than-just-in-the-air/#comment-364224</guid>
		<description>patent reform act 2007 deals inventors more atrotices. the present system is bad enough just look patents are stolen by intellectual material hold ups and deaththreats and intimidation and threat of wrongful prosecution extortion attempts and every dirty thick in the book. the actual inventor in each instance  never sees a dime for all his injenious abilities. thieves and profeteers steal it all. In addition to these personal attricities there are legal ones such as forming clans of liars to run originally stolen inventions back into time to create new double stolen inventions. Employees at work are forced into lifetime invention agreements as a condition of employment steeling there incentive to invent in violation of slavery abolition rights. inventors intellectual material rights stop at 1 year allowing the theft of there intellectual materials. If an original inventors development team is not progressing fast enough the invention is awarded to another team with no compensation for the intellectual materials. many more inventions are accidently disclosed in conversations or created and then never paid for or were created in national or humanitarian need and then never rewarded or acknoledged. The reform act does nothing to correct any of these situatio ns except first to file but this legislation allows up to one year discussion time before filing the patent allowing individuals to claim theft of invention in this time period. the only way to correct this is by starting patent office post deadline filing days where nobody can claim theft unless they can produce that same idea on the same day from locked lockers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>patent reform act 2007 deals inventors more atrotices. the present system is bad enough just look patents are stolen by intellectual material hold ups and deaththreats and intimidation and threat of wrongful prosecution extortion attempts and every dirty thick in the book. the actual inventor in each instance  never sees a dime for all his injenious abilities. thieves and profeteers steal it all. In addition to these personal attricities there are legal ones such as forming clans of liars to run originally stolen inventions back into time to create new double stolen inventions. Employees at work are forced into lifetime invention agreements as a condition of employment steeling there incentive to invent in violation of slavery abolition rights. inventors intellectual material rights stop at 1 year allowing the theft of there intellectual materials. If an original inventors development team is not progressing fast enough the invention is awarded to another team with no compensation for the intellectual materials. many more inventions are accidently disclosed in conversations or created and then never paid for or were created in national or humanitarian need and then never rewarded or acknoledged. The reform act does nothing to correct any of these situatio ns except first to file but this legislation allows up to one year discussion time before filing the patent allowing individuals to claim theft of invention in this time period. the only way to correct this is by starting patent office post deadline filing days where nobody can claim theft unless they can produce that same idea on the same day from locked lockers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael r. thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/07/24/patentmonkey-patent-reform-more-than-just-in-the-air/comment-page-1/#comment-359566</link>
		<dc:creator>michael r. thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 01:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/07/24/patentmonkey-patent-reform-more-than-just-in-the-air/#comment-359566</guid>
		<description>patent reform act 2007 bad for inventors is bad for america. First to file concept was created to get patents into the correct name instead of the wrong name in its present form it gets rid of 1/2 of a way to commit patent fraud and establishes 2 more ways on top of the 3or 4 already existing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>patent reform act 2007 bad for inventors is bad for america. First to file concept was created to get patents into the correct name instead of the wrong name in its present form it gets rid of 1/2 of a way to commit patent fraud and establishes 2 more ways on top of the 3or 4 already existing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/07/24/patentmonkey-patent-reform-more-than-just-in-the-air/comment-page-1/#comment-359563</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 01:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/07/24/patentmonkey-patent-reform-more-than-just-in-the-air/#comment-359563</guid>
		<description>patent reform act 2007 bad for inventors is bad for america. First to file concept was created to get patents into the correct name instead of the wrong name in its present form it gets rid of 1/2 of a way to commit patent fraud and establishes 2 more ways on top of the 3or 4 already existing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>patent reform act 2007 bad for inventors is bad for america. First to file concept was created to get patents into the correct name instead of the wrong name in its present form it gets rid of 1/2 of a way to commit patent fraud and establishes 2 more ways on top of the 3or 4 already existing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Margolin</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/07/24/patentmonkey-patent-reform-more-than-just-in-the-air/comment-page-1/#comment-335664</link>
		<dc:creator>George Margolin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 04:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/07/24/patentmonkey-patent-reform-more-than-just-in-the-air/#comment-335664</guid>
		<description>The REAL Purpose of S.1145/H.R.1908 Patent &quot;REFORM&quot; Legislation

&quot;Not a single section in this proposed legislation is for improving the patent system! And NONE OF THEM are directed at reducing the massively INCREASING, backlog of PENDING Patent Applications. ALL of them are designed to spread Web based Land Mines to cripple American patents and Inventors, while REDUCING THE EXPOSURE OF INFRINGERS! This, CLEARLY, cannot help the people who created the jobs and wealth that make America the most creative technological engine the world has ever known! And it would ABSOLUTELY, POSITIVELY, DESTROY AMERICA&#039;S TECHNOLOGICAL SUPERIORITY!&quot; (Retired Bell Labs Patent Attorney)

S.1145 is being RUSHED THROUGH COMMITTEE, before the Senators CAN DISCOVER that Nothing in it helps American Inventors or Invention or Innovation. And NOTHING IN IT is Good for America! It will only benefit its Goliath Multi- National sponsors!

As a long time Professional Inventor, I can assure you that this bill will be a DISASTER for American Technology, as was shown in the FORTUNE article — http://money.cnn.com/2007/07/02/magazines/fsb/patent_interview/?postversion=2007070306. 

THIS LEGISLATION WOULD DESTROY OUR PATENT SYSTEM and ECONOMY!

This Doublespeak legislation is NOT designed to solve problems with the patent system. It is craftily crafted to PROTECT the sponsoring multi-national corporations from the consequences of &quot;borrowing&quot; — without recompense, the Inventive Property of creative American small businesses, universities and independent inventors! These, together, create virtually ALL OF THE BREAKTHROUGH INVENTIONS WHICH MAKE AMERICA GREAT! 

This Legislation would provide a clear path for countries like CHINA to usurp even MORE of our manufacturing power – including America&#039;s mainstay automotive and Electronic industries. NO MANUFACTURING — NO PAYROLLS – AND A DYING AMERICAN ECONOMY!

WHY THE AMERICAN PATENT SYSTEM WORKS

The purpose of the American patent system is to grant a limited, short term, monopoly if an inventor FULLY describes his or her invention. The Patent Application description of the invention is to advance the art and TEACH it so that other Americans can build upon it. THAT is the purpose of our time tested,The purpose is NOT to SELL products.  successful patent system.

BUT because the Patent Office is DISMALLY UNDERSTAFFED AND UNDER FUNDED – it is INCAPABLE of EXAMINING THE INCREASING FLOOD OF PATENT APPLICATIONS. Because of this — patent application pendency is now about 800,000! In plain English – that is Eight Hundred THOUSAND applications BEHIND – and getting further behind every day. So IF the USPTO were to accept NO NEW APPLICATIONS – it would take more than FIVE YEARS to complete them with the examining staff currently on board. 

S.1145 WILL ABSOLUTELY MAKE THE BACKLOG WORSE!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The REAL Purpose of S.1145/H.R.1908 Patent &#8220;REFORM&#8221; Legislation</p>
<p>&#8220;Not a single section in this proposed legislation is for improving the patent system! And NONE OF THEM are directed at reducing the massively INCREASING, backlog of PENDING Patent Applications. ALL of them are designed to spread Web based Land Mines to cripple American patents and Inventors, while REDUCING THE EXPOSURE OF INFRINGERS! This, CLEARLY, cannot help the people who created the jobs and wealth that make America the most creative technological engine the world has ever known! And it would ABSOLUTELY, POSITIVELY, DESTROY AMERICA&#8217;S TECHNOLOGICAL SUPERIORITY!&#8221; (Retired Bell Labs Patent Attorney)</p>
<p>S.1145 is being RUSHED THROUGH COMMITTEE, before the Senators CAN DISCOVER that Nothing in it helps American Inventors or Invention or Innovation. And NOTHING IN IT is Good for America! It will only benefit its Goliath Multi- National sponsors!</p>
<p>As a long time Professional Inventor, I can assure you that this bill will be a DISASTER for American Technology, as was shown in the FORTUNE article — <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2007/07/02/magazines/fsb/patent_interview/?postversion=2007070306" rel="nofollow">http://money.cnn.com/2007/07/02/magazines/fsb/patent_interview/?postversion=2007070306</a>. </p>
<p>THIS LEGISLATION WOULD DESTROY OUR PATENT SYSTEM and ECONOMY!</p>
<p>This Doublespeak legislation is NOT designed to solve problems with the patent system. It is craftily crafted to PROTECT the sponsoring multi-national corporations from the consequences of &#8220;borrowing&#8221; — without recompense, the Inventive Property of creative American small businesses, universities and independent inventors! These, together, create virtually ALL OF THE BREAKTHROUGH INVENTIONS WHICH MAKE AMERICA GREAT! </p>
<p>This Legislation would provide a clear path for countries like CHINA to usurp even MORE of our manufacturing power – including America&#8217;s mainstay automotive and Electronic industries. NO MANUFACTURING — NO PAYROLLS – AND A DYING AMERICAN ECONOMY!</p>
<p>WHY THE AMERICAN PATENT SYSTEM WORKS</p>
<p>The purpose of the American patent system is to grant a limited, short term, monopoly if an inventor FULLY describes his or her invention. The Patent Application description of the invention is to advance the art and TEACH it so that other Americans can build upon it. THAT is the purpose of our time tested,The purpose is NOT to SELL products.  successful patent system.</p>
<p>BUT because the Patent Office is DISMALLY UNDERSTAFFED AND UNDER FUNDED – it is INCAPABLE of EXAMINING THE INCREASING FLOOD OF PATENT APPLICATIONS. Because of this — patent application pendency is now about 800,000! In plain English – that is Eight Hundred THOUSAND applications BEHIND – and getting further behind every day. So IF the USPTO were to accept NO NEW APPLICATIONS – it would take more than FIVE YEARS to complete them with the examining staff currently on board. </p>
<p>S.1145 WILL ABSOLUTELY MAKE THE BACKLOG WORSE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
