<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FCC To Vote On How To Handle Upcoming Spectrum Auction: Google vs. AT&amp;T, Verizon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/07/30/fcc-to-vote-on-how-to-handle-upcoming-spectrum-auction-google-vs-att-verizon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/07/30/fcc-to-vote-on-how-to-handle-upcoming-spectrum-auction-google-vs-att-verizon/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 18:26:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Mackey</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/07/30/fcc-to-vote-on-how-to-handle-upcoming-spectrum-auction-google-vs-att-verizon/comment-page-1/#comment-344320</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mackey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 03:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/07/30/fcc-to-vote-on-how-to-handle-upcoming-spectrum-auction-google-vs-att-verizon/#comment-344320</guid>
		<description>I have to agree...Google wins!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree&#8230;Google wins!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webonics</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/07/30/fcc-to-vote-on-how-to-handle-upcoming-spectrum-auction-google-vs-att-verizon/comment-page-1/#comment-343304</link>
		<dc:creator>webonics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/07/30/fcc-to-vote-on-how-to-handle-upcoming-spectrum-auction-google-vs-att-verizon/#comment-343304</guid>
		<description>When it comes to answering the question, who do you trust more?  I think AT&amp;T and Verizon have both already shown their hand with their price gouging, privacy violations and slow innovation.  So I think its time for the FCC to take a chance with another party like Google.  Google has already proven itself in so many other areas of technology and has the financials to support such a business that it makes sense to sell them the spectrum.  It certainly could not be any worse than the other two.  

And while I think Google puts up a really compelling and strong argument for their bid, I would not be a bit surprised to see AT&amp;T or Verizon get the bid.  Those two corporations have long ties (lobbyist central) and deep roots ($$) with the telecommunications decision makers.  With the ever increasing rampant corruption in Washington, it is entirely plausible the decision will fall into their court.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to answering the question, who do you trust more?  I think AT&amp;T and Verizon have both already shown their hand with their price gouging, privacy violations and slow innovation.  So I think its time for the FCC to take a chance with another party like Google.  Google has already proven itself in so many other areas of technology and has the financials to support such a business that it makes sense to sell them the spectrum.  It certainly could not be any worse than the other two.  </p>
<p>And while I think Google puts up a really compelling and strong argument for their bid, I would not be a bit surprised to see AT&amp;T or Verizon get the bid.  Those two corporations have long ties (lobbyist central) and deep roots ($$) with the telecommunications decision makers.  With the ever increasing rampant corruption in Washington, it is entirely plausible the decision will fall into their court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
