<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The AudioFile: Can Apple Afford to Slacker?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/10/the-audiofile-can-apple-afford-to-slacker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/10/the-audiofile-can-apple-afford-to-slacker/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:26:06 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: a-bom</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/10/the-audiofile-can-apple-afford-to-slacker/comment-page-1/#comment-941524</link>
		<dc:creator>a-bom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 03:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/08/10/the-audiofile-can-apple-afford-to-slacker/#comment-941524</guid>
		<description>far from groovin ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>far from groovin ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/10/the-audiofile-can-apple-afford-to-slacker/comment-page-1/#comment-360311</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 14:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/08/10/the-audiofile-can-apple-afford-to-slacker/#comment-360311</guid>
		<description>I have to admit, I need to get more into Internet Radio. So off to the Slacker site I go.

That said, I&#039;m a fan of the subscription service concept whether XM/Sirius or Rhapsody.  Enough that I&#039;m putting up with where it falls short.  Like not all songs available and less than ideal portable player options.

Mike, you&#039;re right, if Apple goes internet radio heavy or subscription, that is going to change a the game a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit, I need to get more into Internet Radio. So off to the Slacker site I go.</p>
<p>That said, I&#8217;m a fan of the subscription service concept whether XM/Sirius or Rhapsody.  Enough that I&#8217;m putting up with where it falls short.  Like not all songs available and less than ideal portable player options.</p>
<p>Mike, you&#8217;re right, if Apple goes internet radio heavy or subscription, that is going to change a the game a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/10/the-audiofile-can-apple-afford-to-slacker/comment-page-1/#comment-360249</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 13:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/08/10/the-audiofile-can-apple-afford-to-slacker/#comment-360249</guid>
		<description>Two things: (1) that Slacker portable player has been &quot;about to drop&quot; for long enough now that I&#039;ll call it vaporware until it actually makes an appearance. And (2) subscription services are stupid if you don&#039;t like jamming to the latest shiny ear candy. I don&#039;t want to have to pay Apple in perpetuity, thank you very much.  Internet radio I&#039;m down with, but there&#039;s a reason subscription services aren&#039;t more popular.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two things: (1) that Slacker portable player has been &#8220;about to drop&#8221; for long enough now that I&#8217;ll call it vaporware until it actually makes an appearance. And (2) subscription services are stupid if you don&#8217;t like jamming to the latest shiny ear candy. I don&#8217;t want to have to pay Apple in perpetuity, thank you very much.  Internet radio I&#8217;m down with, but there&#8217;s a reason subscription services aren&#8217;t more popular.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
