<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPhone in Europe in Time for Förder Chröstmas-tide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/21/iphone-in-europe-in-time-for-forder-chrostmas-tide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/21/iphone-in-europe-in-time-for-forder-chrostmas-tide/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:10:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/21/iphone-in-europe-in-time-for-forder-chrostmas-tide/comment-page-1/#comment-383131</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 23:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/08/21/iphone-in-europe-in-time-for-forder-chrostmas-tide/#comment-383131</guid>
		<description>I was under the impression that operators in the US don&#039;t even use the same frequencies - they&#039;re still in a Betamax versus VHS kind of war.
I&#039;m surprised that Apple is even considering sticking with single operators in Europe in the first place. People don&#039;t stand for it. A phones a phone, a network is a network, just a different price. I can&#039;t think of any other phone that is only available on one operator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was under the impression that operators in the US don&#8217;t even use the same frequencies &#8211; they&#8217;re still in a Betamax versus VHS kind of war.<br />
I&#8217;m surprised that Apple is even considering sticking with single operators in Europe in the first place. People don&#8217;t stand for it. A phones a phone, a network is a network, just a different price. I can&#8217;t think of any other phone that is only available on one operator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/21/iphone-in-europe-in-time-for-forder-chrostmas-tide/comment-page-1/#comment-379677</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 13:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/08/21/iphone-in-europe-in-time-for-forder-chrostmas-tide/#comment-379677</guid>
		<description>&quot;This odd move — choosing to go with three different operators — is an example of the oddly fractured nature of European cell providers.&quot;  

Since when is dealing with non-monopoly competitors &quot;oddly fractured&quot;?  This is the nature of free markets economies.  Perhaps this needs some historical revisionism:

&quot;This odd move -- choosing to lock in to one particular operator -- is an example of the oddly monopolistic nature of US cell providers.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This odd move — choosing to go with three different operators — is an example of the oddly fractured nature of European cell providers.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Since when is dealing with non-monopoly competitors &#8220;oddly fractured&#8221;?  This is the nature of free markets economies.  Perhaps this needs some historical revisionism:</p>
<p>&#8220;This odd move &#8212; choosing to lock in to one particular operator &#8212; is an example of the oddly monopolistic nature of US cell providers.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
