<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jhannet Sejas Pleads Guilty To Unlawful Recording Charges</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/22/jhannet-sejas-pleads-guilty-to-unlawful-recording-charges/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/22/jhannet-sejas-pleads-guilty-to-unlawful-recording-charges/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:26:37 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: huh?</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/22/jhannet-sejas-pleads-guilty-to-unlawful-recording-charges/comment-page-1/#comment-1075234</link>
		<dc:creator>huh?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 09:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/08/22/jhannet-sejas-pleads-guilty-to-unlawful-recording-charges/#comment-1075234</guid>
		<description>?? this is much less than fair use for a song ??
Why are movies given special copyright advantage over music and print?


Rationale for fair use of a song sample:
    * The audio sample is of inferior quality of the original track.
    * At 36 seconds, the audio sample is significantly shorter than the main work. Due to its size, the audio sample would not be a perferred substitute to the main track for either entertainment or commercial purposes. Other short samples of this and other songs on the album appear on Amazon.com and iTunes, among other sites, for promotional purposes.
    * No free or public domain audio samples have been located to represent this subject.
    * The audio sample does not limit the copyright owners&#039; rights to reproduce the song, album, or video in any way.
    * The audio sample is being used for informational purposes only.

The audio sample is a copyrighted work. U.S. copyright laws apply to this work. Should a free or public domain sample be located, it should be used in place of this audio sample.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>?? this is much less than fair use for a song ??<br />
Why are movies given special copyright advantage over music and print?</p>
<p>Rationale for fair use of a song sample:<br />
    * The audio sample is of inferior quality of the original track.<br />
    * At 36 seconds, the audio sample is significantly shorter than the main work. Due to its size, the audio sample would not be a perferred substitute to the main track for either entertainment or commercial purposes. Other short samples of this and other songs on the album appear on Amazon.com and iTunes, among other sites, for promotional purposes.<br />
    * No free or public domain audio samples have been located to represent this subject.<br />
    * The audio sample does not limit the copyright owners&#8217; rights to reproduce the song, album, or video in any way.<br />
    * The audio sample is being used for informational purposes only.</p>
<p>The audio sample is a copyrighted work. U.S. copyright laws apply to this work. Should a free or public domain sample be located, it should be used in place of this audio sample.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymos</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/22/jhannet-sejas-pleads-guilty-to-unlawful-recording-charges/comment-page-1/#comment-1036338</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 17:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/08/22/jhannet-sejas-pleads-guilty-to-unlawful-recording-charges/#comment-1036338</guid>
		<description>yo jhannet can u get me some movies</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yo jhannet can u get me some movies</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glenneroo</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/22/jhannet-sejas-pleads-guilty-to-unlawful-recording-charges/comment-page-1/#comment-382344</link>
		<dc:creator>glenneroo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 10:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/08/22/jhannet-sejas-pleads-guilty-to-unlawful-recording-charges/#comment-382344</guid>
		<description>haha and with a name like Spellbinda, we should take you seriously? wanna-be gangster or just another loser?

What&#039;s sensationalistic about this story? Or are you just throwing around words you read on the intarwebs, though you have no idea what they mean?

What&#039;s so wrong with filming a few seconds? Go after the REAL pirates, not some clueless chick who&#039;s not out to hurt anybody!

I say boycott the movie studios instead!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha and with a name like Spellbinda, we should take you seriously? wanna-be gangster or just another loser?</p>
<p>What&#8217;s sensationalistic about this story? Or are you just throwing around words you read on the intarwebs, though you have no idea what they mean?</p>
<p>What&#8217;s so wrong with filming a few seconds? Go after the REAL pirates, not some clueless chick who&#8217;s not out to hurt anybody!</p>
<p>I say boycott the movie studios instead!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YO</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/22/jhannet-sejas-pleads-guilty-to-unlawful-recording-charges/comment-page-1/#comment-382100</link>
		<dc:creator>YO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 05:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/08/22/jhannet-sejas-pleads-guilty-to-unlawful-recording-charges/#comment-382100</guid>
		<description>This is crazy why dont they go after those billion or warez site on the net that they can&#039;t get their hands on but can go after a girl recording just 20 secs of a movie, they should be going after the sites providing FULL LENGTH MOVIES. if you want one check out www.ecm-forums.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is crazy why dont they go after those billion or warez site on the net that they can&#8217;t get their hands on but can go after a girl recording just 20 secs of a movie, they should be going after the sites providing FULL LENGTH MOVIES. if you want one check out <a href="http://www.ecm-forums.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.ecm-forums.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dadycupcakes</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/22/jhannet-sejas-pleads-guilty-to-unlawful-recording-charges/comment-page-1/#comment-381750</link>
		<dc:creator>dadycupcakes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 01:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/08/22/jhannet-sejas-pleads-guilty-to-unlawful-recording-charges/#comment-381750</guid>
		<description>well looking at her jewelery especially that ring and earings it seems like she will be able to pay the  $71 easaly.... if not she is hot enough to go be a prostitut or something haha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well looking at her jewelery especially that ring and earings it seems like she will be able to pay the  $71 easaly&#8230;. if not she is hot enough to go be a prostitut or something haha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CGboy</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/22/jhannet-sejas-pleads-guilty-to-unlawful-recording-charges/comment-page-1/#comment-381187</link>
		<dc:creator>CGboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 14:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/08/22/jhannet-sejas-pleads-guilty-to-unlawful-recording-charges/#comment-381187</guid>
		<description>Haters just like robotic bullshit.. you&#039;re in the wrong place Spellbinda</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haters just like robotic bullshit.. you&#8217;re in the wrong place Spellbinda</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Ha</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/22/jhannet-sejas-pleads-guilty-to-unlawful-recording-charges/comment-page-1/#comment-380287</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Ha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 23:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/08/22/jhannet-sejas-pleads-guilty-to-unlawful-recording-charges/#comment-380287</guid>
		<description>Sensationalist. Really?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sensationalist. Really?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spellbinda</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/22/jhannet-sejas-pleads-guilty-to-unlawful-recording-charges/comment-page-1/#comment-380070</link>
		<dc:creator>Spellbinda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 19:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/08/22/jhannet-sejas-pleads-guilty-to-unlawful-recording-charges/#comment-380070</guid>
		<description>If only Peter Ha&#039;s father had pulled out and his mother swallowed as intended.  Then we wouldn&#039;t have to read sensationalist bullshit like this.  The girl fucked up.  She paid her fine.  Her record will be fine.  End of story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If only Peter Ha&#8217;s father had pulled out and his mother swallowed as intended.  Then we wouldn&#8217;t have to read sensationalist bullshit like this.  The girl fucked up.  She paid her fine.  Her record will be fine.  End of story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
