<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bloops! Apple Legal Essentially Confirms Fat Nano Existence [Updated]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/23/bloops-apple-legal-essentially-confirms-fat-nano-existence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/23/bloops-apple-legal-essentially-confirms-fat-nano-existence/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:23:25 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: brett</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/23/bloops-apple-legal-essentially-confirms-fat-nano-existence/comment-page-1/#comment-726167</link>
		<dc:creator>brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 07:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/08/22/bloops-apple-legal-essentially-confirms-fat-nano-existence/#comment-726167</guid>
		<description>my god that&#039;s a terrible photoshop job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my god that&#8217;s a terrible photoshop job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Hickey</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/23/bloops-apple-legal-essentially-confirms-fat-nano-existence/comment-page-1/#comment-382737</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Hickey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 16:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/08/22/bloops-apple-legal-essentially-confirms-fat-nano-existence/#comment-382737</guid>
		<description>@ Lefty: WTF? You did read the article, the part where it says it&#039;s a hastily made mock-up? Yes, it&#039;s fake. We sorta said, &quot;Here&#039;s a fake version cuz Apple won&#039;t let us post the real one!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Lefty: WTF? You did read the article, the part where it says it&#8217;s a hastily made mock-up? Yes, it&#8217;s fake. We sorta said, &#8220;Here&#8217;s a fake version cuz Apple won&#8217;t let us post the real one!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tt</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/23/bloops-apple-legal-essentially-confirms-fat-nano-existence/comment-page-1/#comment-382488</link>
		<dc:creator>tt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/08/22/bloops-apple-legal-essentially-confirms-fat-nano-existence/#comment-382488</guid>
		<description>apple should be sued for this if true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>apple should be sued for this if true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Biggs</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/23/bloops-apple-legal-essentially-confirms-fat-nano-existence/comment-page-1/#comment-382485</link>
		<dc:creator>John Biggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/08/22/bloops-apple-legal-essentially-confirms-fat-nano-existence/#comment-382485</guid>
		<description>ummm
yes. this one is fake, made by hickey in about 5 minutes. the &quot;flower&quot; version was &quot;real,&quot; at least according to apple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ummm<br />
yes. this one is fake, made by hickey in about 5 minutes. the &#8220;flower&#8221; version was &#8220;real,&#8221; at least according to apple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mackey</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/23/bloops-apple-legal-essentially-confirms-fat-nano-existence/comment-page-1/#comment-382041</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mackey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 04:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/08/22/bloops-apple-legal-essentially-confirms-fat-nano-existence/#comment-382041</guid>
		<description>No big deal one way or another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No big deal one way or another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LEFTY</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/23/bloops-apple-legal-essentially-confirms-fat-nano-existence/comment-page-1/#comment-382033</link>
		<dc:creator>LEFTY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 04:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/08/22/bloops-apple-legal-essentially-confirms-fat-nano-existence/#comment-382033</guid>
		<description>If you zoom in on the photo you can see that its been f&#039;d with.  Look at the right side.  If this was the real nano then there would be no reason to mask the background out.  THIS IS FAKE!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you zoom in on the photo you can see that its been f&#8217;d with.  Look at the right side.  If this was the real nano then there would be no reason to mask the background out.  THIS IS FAKE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bpm2000</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/23/bloops-apple-legal-essentially-confirms-fat-nano-existence/comment-page-1/#comment-381745</link>
		<dc:creator>bpm2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 00:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/08/22/bloops-apple-legal-essentially-confirms-fat-nano-existence/#comment-381745</guid>
		<description>crash is right, and i must go wipe my mouth and ass now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>crash is right, and i must go wipe my mouth and ass now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/23/bloops-apple-legal-essentially-confirms-fat-nano-existence/comment-page-1/#comment-381699</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 00:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/08/22/bloops-apple-legal-essentially-confirms-fat-nano-existence/#comment-381699</guid>
		<description>cease and desist letters/emails rule</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cease and desist letters/emails rule</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff B</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/23/bloops-apple-legal-essentially-confirms-fat-nano-existence/comment-page-1/#comment-381613</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 22:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/08/22/bloops-apple-legal-essentially-confirms-fat-nano-existence/#comment-381613</guid>
		<description>Zune 2.0 has a fighting chance if these butt ugly devices surface! 
Bring em on Apple</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zune 2.0 has a fighting chance if these butt ugly devices surface!<br />
Bring em on Apple</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Goldman</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/23/bloops-apple-legal-essentially-confirms-fat-nano-existence/comment-page-1/#comment-381609</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Goldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 22:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/08/22/bloops-apple-legal-essentially-confirms-fat-nano-existence/#comment-381609</guid>
		<description>Design-wise, this actually isn&#039;t too far off from the 2G shuffle, so it is somewhat believable. Center the controls, make it a clickwheel and add a screen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Design-wise, this actually isn&#8217;t too far off from the 2G shuffle, so it is somewhat believable. Center the controls, make it a clickwheel and add a screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: milkandtwo</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/23/bloops-apple-legal-essentially-confirms-fat-nano-existence/comment-page-1/#comment-380873</link>
		<dc:creator>milkandtwo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/08/22/bloops-apple-legal-essentially-confirms-fat-nano-existence/#comment-380873</guid>
		<description>ummm not sure if you have looked at Gizmodo&#039;s coverage of this story, basically they think that if it is the new nano that its ugly. Gizmodo, i would like to draw your attention to your site design, please hire someone who knows what they are doing, as the only ugly thing about the new nano &#039;shots&#039; is the baby blue page the image sits on...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ummm not sure if you have looked at Gizmodo&#8217;s coverage of this story, basically they think that if it is the new nano that its ugly. Gizmodo, i would like to draw your attention to your site design, please hire someone who knows what they are doing, as the only ugly thing about the new nano &#8217;shots&#8217; is the baby blue page the image sits on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Crash</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/23/bloops-apple-legal-essentially-confirms-fat-nano-existence/comment-page-1/#comment-380839</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Crash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 07:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/08/22/bloops-apple-legal-essentially-confirms-fat-nano-existence/#comment-380839</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not quite sure what this design makes me want to do... Vomit, or crap myself.

Quite probably both actually... And not for the good reasons.

Oh and surely they can&#039;t claim fuck all about intellectual property if it is - in fact - not their intellectual property.

That would have been like them whining about all the fake iphone designs all those years back. They can&#039;t whine if it&#039;s not theirs. Surely?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not quite sure what this design makes me want to do&#8230; Vomit, or crap myself.</p>
<p>Quite probably both actually&#8230; And not for the good reasons.</p>
<p>Oh and surely they can&#8217;t claim fuck all about intellectual property if it is &#8211; in fact &#8211; not their intellectual property.</p>
<p>That would have been like them whining about all the fake iphone designs all those years back. They can&#8217;t whine if it&#8217;s not theirs. Surely?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: technabob</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/23/bloops-apple-legal-essentially-confirms-fat-nano-existence/comment-page-1/#comment-380617</link>
		<dc:creator>technabob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 04:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/08/22/bloops-apple-legal-essentially-confirms-fat-nano-existence/#comment-380617</guid>
		<description>I really think those designs are phony.... just a red herring planted in the blogger community to get the buzz machine going. Apple sending out requests to remove them just gets everyone even more charged up.

If you look at Apple&#039;s current industrial design aesthetic (the aluminum iMac, keyboards and iPhone) these just don&#039;t fit in. I&#039;d give it a few weeks for the REAL designs to surface just in time for holiday gift buyers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really think those designs are phony&#8230;. just a red herring planted in the blogger community to get the buzz machine going. Apple sending out requests to remove them just gets everyone even more charged up.</p>
<p>If you look at Apple&#8217;s current industrial design aesthetic (the aluminum iMac, keyboards and iPhone) these just don&#8217;t fit in. I&#8217;d give it a few weeks for the REAL designs to surface just in time for holiday gift buyers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
