Fat Nano™ Sized: Maybe It’s Just Big Form-Factored?
- August 24th, 2007
- 4 Comments
So exactly how big is the new Fat Nano™ going to be? According to ClockSkew.com, who did a mathematical study of the leaked photos when juxtaposed with a 2nd Gen Nano, it should be exactly 3-inches tall. That’s a full half-inch shorter than the current Nano. It will also be 2.3-inches wide, which is almost an inch wider than the current device’s 1.6-inches.
Granted, this is speculation that assumes the clickwheel on both devices are the same size, but that’s a good bet. Another good bet is that the Empire knows we’re here, but that’s a different story.
For the total analysis, hit the link.
New iPod Nano Size Analysis [ClockSkew]
D. Cootey (Who am I?)
1 year ago
Seems reasonable to assume that the click wheel is the same size. I can’t imagine it would be useful much smaller. Thanks for posting that.
~Douglas
-=-
☆ http://thesplinteredmind.blogspot.com
Fred (Who am I?)
1 year ago
This information makes the Fat Nano slightly less lame, maybe a 7 on the Lame-O-Meter instead of a 9. There’s no reason to change a form factor that works, and for which people have a bunch of accessories, in order to add functionality that most current nano owners don’t want. Change the form factor so I can watch videos on a 1½ x 2 inch screen? Lame.
Duh (Who am I?)
1 year ago
Shopped.
jbr
5 months ago
Its called the fat nano
Because this model nano is commonly seen on the arms of joggers many of whom are fat
Its a fat peoples music player
Reply