<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New American-ized Nokia N-95 Vs. Old N-95: Hands On, Side-By-Side</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/29/new-american-ized-nokia-n-95-vs-old-n-95-hands-on-side-by-side/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/29/new-american-ized-nokia-n-95-vs-old-n-95-hands-on-side-by-side/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:45:37 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: future gadgets</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/29/new-american-ized-nokia-n-95-vs-old-n-95-hands-on-side-by-side/comment-page-1/#comment-391570</link>
		<dc:creator>future gadgets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 13:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/08/29/new-american-ized-nokia-n-95-vs-old-n-95-hands-on-side-by-side/#comment-391570</guid>
		<description>hm ... not much of a different though ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hm &#8230; not much of a different though &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yo</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/29/new-american-ized-nokia-n-95-vs-old-n-95-hands-on-side-by-side/comment-page-1/#comment-390812</link>
		<dc:creator>yo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 02:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/08/29/new-american-ized-nokia-n-95-vs-old-n-95-hands-on-side-by-side/#comment-390812</guid>
		<description>i agree - att, not tmo, sorry...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree &#8211; att, not tmo, sorry&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olly</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/29/new-american-ized-nokia-n-95-vs-old-n-95-hands-on-side-by-side/comment-page-1/#comment-390168</link>
		<dc:creator>olly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 19:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/08/29/new-american-ized-nokia-n-95-vs-old-n-95-hands-on-side-by-side/#comment-390168</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t seen any indication that this has 3G bands for T-Mobile.  AT&amp;T uses 850/1900 for their 3G offering, while T-Mobile will use 1700/2100 (uplink/downlink)... can you confirm this?

Thanks!

-olly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t seen any indication that this has 3G bands for T-Mobile.  AT&amp;T uses 850/1900 for their 3G offering, while T-Mobile will use 1700/2100 (uplink/downlink)&#8230; can you confirm this?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
<p>-olly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shelbinator</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/08/29/new-american-ized-nokia-n-95-vs-old-n-95-hands-on-side-by-side/comment-page-1/#comment-390044</link>
		<dc:creator>shelbinator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 18:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/08/29/new-american-ized-nokia-n-95-vs-old-n-95-hands-on-side-by-side/#comment-390044</guid>
		<description>If those phones got any hotter side by side, they&#039;d be playing footsie in an airport men&#039;s room.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If those phones got any hotter side by side, they&#8217;d be playing footsie in an airport men&#8217;s room.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
