<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The iPod Fat Nano™: Fat and Thin and Fat and Rad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/05/the-ipod-fat-nano%e2%84%a2-fat-and-thin-and-fat-and-rad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/05/the-ipod-fat-nano%e2%84%a2-fat-and-thin-and-fat-and-rad/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 20:44:19 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: leah</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/05/the-ipod-fat-nano%e2%84%a2-fat-and-thin-and-fat-and-rad/comment-page-1/#comment-405379</link>
		<dc:creator>leah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 13:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/09/05/the-ipod-fat-nano%e2%84%a2-fat-and-thin-and-fat-and-rad/#comment-405379</guid>
		<description>I think the fat nano just looks plain strange.
http://www.itgumbo.com/mumbogumbo/2007/09/new_square_ipod_is_the_ipod_yo.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the fat nano just looks plain strange.<br />
<a href="http://www.itgumbo.com/mumbogumbo/2007/09/new_square_ipod_is_the_ipod_yo.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.itgumbo.com/mumbogumbo/2007/09/new_square_ipod_is_the_ipod_yo.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Gorman</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/05/the-ipod-fat-nano%e2%84%a2-fat-and-thin-and-fat-and-rad/comment-page-1/#comment-404570</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 06:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/09/05/the-ipod-fat-nano%e2%84%a2-fat-and-thin-and-fat-and-rad/#comment-404570</guid>
		<description>Any detail on how Nike+iPod attachments will work with this new nano?  I expect that they would continue to work the way they do with the current nano, but my assumptions have been wrong in the past... 

-N</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any detail on how Nike+iPod attachments will work with this new nano?  I expect that they would continue to work the way they do with the current nano, but my assumptions have been wrong in the past&#8230; </p>
<p>-N</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/05/the-ipod-fat-nano%e2%84%a2-fat-and-thin-and-fat-and-rad/comment-page-1/#comment-403343</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 20:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/09/05/the-ipod-fat-nano%e2%84%a2-fat-and-thin-and-fat-and-rad/#comment-403343</guid>
		<description>How precisely is a new Nano with the same storage capacity as the old Nano &quot;fat on the storage&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How precisely is a new Nano with the same storage capacity as the old Nano &#8220;fat on the storage&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
