<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Screencast: Early Look At &#8216;Grooveshark&#8217; Music Service</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/16/screencast-early-look-at-grooveshark-music-service/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/16/screencast-early-look-at-grooveshark-music-service/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: dwalk51</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/16/screencast-early-look-at-grooveshark-music-service/#comment-431392</link>
		<dc:creator>dwalk51</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 02:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/09/16/screencast-early-look-at-grooveshark-music-service/#comment-431392</guid>
		<description>I signed up for it and got the program but I haven't really looked into it.
Next time I have time to do so I will do so though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I signed up for it and got the program but I haven&#8217;t really looked into it.<br />
Next time I have time to do so I will do so though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James W.</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/16/screencast-early-look-at-grooveshark-music-service/#comment-430313</link>
		<dc:creator>James W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/09/16/screencast-early-look-at-grooveshark-music-service/#comment-430313</guid>
		<description>I've been using Grooveshark along with Grooveshark/Sharkbyte for about two months now and so far, the service has been unimpressive at best.  The client side program needs some aesthetic work and at best, more usefulness.  As it stands right now, all Sharkbyte is good for is uploading songs from your PC to the Grooveshark servers.  On the server-side of things, their UI is a bit clunky but is coming along in terms of cleanliness and user experience but it still has some ways to go.

Getting paid to share your music will be an interesting subject once Grooveshark actually gets more users -- my account has been clocked with no downloads yet -- and their network gets put under more strain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using Grooveshark along with Grooveshark/Sharkbyte for about two months now and so far, the service has been unimpressive at best.  The client side program needs some aesthetic work and at best, more usefulness.  As it stands right now, all Sharkbyte is good for is uploading songs from your PC to the Grooveshark servers.  On the server-side of things, their UI is a bit clunky but is coming along in terms of cleanliness and user experience but it still has some ways to go.</p>
<p>Getting paid to share your music will be an interesting subject once Grooveshark actually gets more users &#8212; my account has been clocked with no downloads yet &#8212; and their network gets put under more strain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.036 seconds -->
